>insert any ethnicity here< deserves genocide. Is it racist?

[columbus]

Try it and see.

For science!

I have posted things that annoyed the staff of RF before.
Ask @ADigitalArtist or @Debater Slayer or @Brickjectivity .
But I don't see any reason to do it here. How about we just discuss the concept of improvement to society through race mixing, AKA white genocide, without starting another thread on the topic?
Tom

 

[Enoch07]

I already said why it wouldn't work. Are you really not familiar with white supremacists using "white genocide" to refer to race mixing?

I don't listen to white supremacist. Everything they say is p00p.

 

[Enoch07]

I have posted things that annoyed the staff of RF before.
Ask @ADigitalArtist or @Debater Slayer or @Brickjectivity .
But I don't see any reason to do it here. How about we just discuss the concept of improvement to society through race mixing, AKA white genocide, without starting another thread on the topic?
Tom

Nothing wrong with race mixing. I've done white a lot of it myself.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

I don't listen to white supremacist. Everything they say is p00p.

That's nice but that's what the professor was referring to, as has been pointed out.

White genocide conspiracy theory - Wikipedia

You probably won't ever accept it, though, because it makes the whole point of your thread pointless.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

The question is simple. Is it racist to wish genocide upon any ethnicity? The answer is a simple yes or no. Make your vote and explain why you feel the way you feel.

Yes.

Except where New Zealand is concerned.

 

[columbus]

Nothing wrong with race mixing. I've done white a lot of it myself.

So you are participating in white genocide while griping about people who just talk about it?
OMG!

Tom

 

[Enoch07]

That's nice but that's what the professor was referring to, as has been pointed out.

White genocide conspiracy theory - Wikipedia

You probably won't ever accept it, though, because it makes the whole point of your thread pointless.

The point is, that it's a double standard.

 

[Enoch07]

So you are participating in white genocide while griping about people who just talk about it?
OMG!

Tom

It's not genocide when people of different ethnicities date/breed/whatevs.

It could be considered genocide if it was mandated by an authority though. And a college professor who has a position of power and influence says he wants white genocide. It is the same as a white supremacist saying black people should be eradicated. Do you understand this?

 

[Mister Emu]

It's a pretty big distortion of "genocide" when it's twisted from its normal definition - the systematic mass murder of a people - to mean when white people freely choose to start loving families with non-white partners.

The UN CPPCG states in article 2 that genocide includes any act designed to reduce or extinguish a racial group, including actions designed to reduce in-group birthrates.

Intermarriage isn't genocide, people finding real love is a good thing whatever their race. Promoting intermarriage as a good as opposed to neutral is questionable at best. If you do it to lower a racial group's numbers, it is a genocidal act.

I find it pretty difficult to believe option b) is more plausible if you look at it without prejudice.

That seems a weak defense given that he followed up his original statement by saying historic racial violence directed at whites was a good thing.

 

[Quiddity]

Why is this even a question?

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

The point is, that it's a double standard.

No, it isn't. You seem to have trouble accepting the facts around the statement and letting it go.

 

[columbus]

It could be considered genocide if it was mandated by an authority though. And a college professor who has a position of power and influence says he wants white genocide. It is the same as a white supremacist saying black people should be eradicated. Do you understand this?

Yes. But I don't think that the prof had any influence over who makes babies with who. I think he was using an idiomatic term, and it was drenched in irony. But I don't claim to know with such a small amount of information, lacking in context. I don't care much about his opinions and he got fired already.

t's not genocide when people of different ethnicities date/breed/whatevs.

You and I and most people agree about this. But many people don't. It's mostly the white racist people who call race mixing genocide. Although I have heard of black people who hold similar attitudes.
Tom

 

[Enoch07]

No, it isn't. You seem to have trouble accepting the facts around the statement and letting it go.

Fact is If any other ethnicity was placed in that statement than white. Heads would roll, and you know this, hence why you refuse to make the post i suggested. Play coy all you want. But you know you are in the wrong here.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Fact is If any other ethnicity was placed in that statement than white. Heads would roll, and you know this, hence why you refuse to make the post i suggested. Play coy all you want. But you know you are in the wrong here.

At this point, you're getting on my nerves. You have been told what the professor was referring to and that he was not seriously calling for genocide of white people. So replacing it with another ethnicity wouldn't make any sense because he was referring to a conspiracy claim by racial supremacists and making fun of them. You just seem to want something to ***** about and are obsessed with finding something that isn't there. That's paranoid thinking. I'm not interested anymore and am close to putting you on ignore.

 

[Enoch07]

Yes. But I don't think that the prof had any influence over who makes babies with who. I think he was using an idiomatic term, and it was drenched in irony. But I don't claim to know with such a small amount of information, lacking in context. I don't care much about his opinions and he got fired already.

Well it just don't matter to me. In an equal society everyone should be held to the same standards. That's all I am saying.

 

[columbus]

Well it just don't matter to me. In an equal society everyone should be held to the same standards. That's all I am saying.

Oh I agree.
But in the world of racial tension and identity politics, we'd all be better off if we were more precise and less quick to take offense. Don't you agree?
Tom

 

[Enoch07]

At this point, you're getting on my nerves. You have been told what the professor was referring to and that he was not seriously calling for genocide of white people. So replacing it with another ethnicity wouldn't make any sense because he was referring to a conspiracy claim by racial supremacists and making fun of them. You just seem to want something to ***** about and are obsessed with finding something that isn't there. That's paranoid thinking. I'm not interested anymore and am close to putting you on ignore.

Bye Felicia,

You can ignore facts all day that's on you.

 

[Enoch07]

Oh I agree.
But in the world of racial tension and identity politics, we'd all be better off if we were more precise and less quick to take offense. Don't you agree?
Tom

Sure, but let's say I ,a white mildly conservative guy, had said this about a non-whites, with the same intentions. Would I have been defended like other people have defended this Professor?

I think not.

And this is my point. Regardless of his intentions, it's a double standard.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Bye Felicia,

You can ignore facts all day that's on you.

You're projecting, because you haven't presented any facts. Oh, and grow up. I'll stop feeding your insipid trolling now.

 

[Enoch07]

You're projecting, because you haven't presented any facts. Oh, and grow up. I'll stop feeding your insipid trolling now.

Of course not. That's why you refuse to prove your point by making that post I suggested. If it's silly then do it and prove your point.

The fact is If you make that post. You will suffer the consequences, and you know it. Just as I and everyone else here knows it. So why is it so hard to admit this professor is racist scum then?