Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Disqualifications? Perhaps you mean retractions. And retractions are a very very small percentage of articles published. About a tenth of a percent.I guess the only thing apes can do is scream... and that's why there are only disqualifications over and over again...
I assumed he was using Google or some general search engine and would expect the results for God to bring back numerous hits. It doesn't really change that doing so does nothing to support the claim that evolution is a myth without evidence.Try again. The search was to be in the scientific literature. Wait, I will do it for you:
Google Scholar
scholar.google.com
Sorry, only 5,170,000 results. And on the first page it is roughly fifty/fifty in regards to whether or not he exists. The search on evolution is going to be almost totally in support of the concept.
Be sure and tell the folks back home about your "tremendous" victory.A search of the word "God" had 5,990,000,000 results. And that was only one word.
I think a literalist creationist can do more than that but chooses not to.I guess the only thing apes can do is scream... and that's why there are only disqualifications over and over again...
Ah, the defeat defiance ritual. I understand.Do you think atheists will ever invent an ape pride?
Don't care. It doesn't have anything to do with the topic of the thread and doesn't support your claims.Let's talk "web": Did you know that the official JWs website is the most translated in the whole net?
... more than any scientific institution website, more than NASA's website, more than the Vatican's website, a lot more than any other website, simply THE MOST TRANSLATED, without adds, with security, totally free for all public ...
f it existed there would be lots of evidence but there is none. there would be many instances of slight changes in species over long periods but this is not seen. It's not that there are a lot of missing links so much as the entire "fossil record" is a missing link.
The irony. How amusing.Why are you crying so much?
I am predicting more of this to come.Why are you crying so much?
Langkawi bent-toed gecko.
Pygmy three-toed sloth.
And of course, my avatar are just 3 examples of evidence of evolution
So yes, changes are seen. And lots of them
Oh, the irony!I am trying to find anything useful in your last, about 10 posts, and all I see is like a tantrum of a child who is telling someone that he fought with someone else and won, but he won't stop crying.
Show me.And every one of those changes is sudden.
And look. My prediction was correct too. How pleasing.I am trying to find anything useful in your last, about 10 posts, and all I see is like a tantrum of a child who is telling someone that he fought with someone else and won, but he won't stop crying.
And every one of those changes is sudden.