Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
.....bah!as for homo sex, with meta third eye, a chi-reading form of clairvoyance, you can have the best sex because you can read your partner.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
.....bah!as for homo sex, with meta third eye, a chi-reading form of clairvoyance, you can have the best sex because you can read your partner.
Pride has no part in it.....nor does bigotry... I do not steal.....it derives from guidance of the ten commandments.....I am not proud of being honest...not do I consider it bigotry because I feel honesty should be the proper and natural way of human behavior...Nonsense, it's the monotheistic religions that have the main problem, this seems at least partly due to the authors living in a homophobic and patriarchal culture.
In any case in a religious context it's pure hypocrisy to preach peace and brotherly love and then discriminate based on sexuality, gender, whatever. Shame on any religion that promotes or condones discrimination and bigotry.
You sound like you're proud of your bigotry. Appalling. Shame on you and your shallow ideas of spirituality.
It is the yin and yang thing....both female and vagina are ying and both male and and penis are yang....together they are a creative combination.... Homo sex involves the male and penis yang coming together with a male yang and anus ying.....together they are a destructive combination....hiv/aids..Since it's anatomically impossible, as men don't have vaginas, what are they even talking about?
And why doesn't the bible care about lesbians?
You try to thread bomb with your incessant inane repetitive comments.....you have already accused me of bigotry in your last post to me....and I already have responded to that. Please do not bomb the thread to make your point....I get where you are coming from... .I would prefer that you get real and stop dressing up your bigotry as something spiritual.
Lev 18:22 (ESVST) 22 You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.
Lev 20:13 (ESVST) 13 If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.
I guess, oh theologian, these aren't about being "GAY" either, are they?
By action or by orientation?According to my religion being homophobic is a sin. So there.
Being gay is not a sin.
A gay person does not commit sexual sin (edit) because he is gay.
ANY person who sleeps with their same gender is sinning.
So, you're saying, if a man has sex with a man (by today's standards) he's not committing sin. But if a man "sleeps" with a man, it's sin?
Being gay is not a sin.
A gay person does not commit sexual sin (edit) because he is gay.
Right. If a person believes he/she is gay, but never has sex with the same gender, they have not sinned.
But this is a translation of Hebrew by Hebrews....where is your proof these Jews do not understand what their Torah means?
As an atheist...it is not surprising as it goes with the culture....many homos are atheists so they can feel free from the guilt of sin...
Like I said, if other religions use a "TRANSLATION" of the Bible, it holds no wait with me, because they have translated it to fit their teaching, like the WT. If they use a "VERSION" of they Bible it will be the same as I use. If a religion uses "their own" translated Bible, I will not even look at it because they have written it to say what they want you to believe, not what it really says.
I do not determine truth...nor do I presume to....the religious traditions speak with one voice regarding the error of homo sex...
I imagine each time they tried to specifically mention it they had to start over because the parchment got all sticky.And why doesn't the bible care about lesbians?
Fine, why don't you show the relevant Hebrew passage.with the translation....with a link to the concordance or whatever the source?Doesn't matter what modern group came up with that.
The FACTS are that it does not say that, and there is no - as with a!
These are additions to make it seem to say what they believe.
Again - all YOU have to do is look up the actual Hebrew words, - in order - and you will know it does not say that.
How do I know it isn't that English translation?
Simple, - I looked it up in the Hebrew, - and translated it word for word, - in order.
When you do this - the additions are glaring.
*
Pride has no part in it.....nor does bigotry... I do not steal.....it derives from guidance of the ten commandments.....I am not proud of being honest...not do I consider it bigotry because I feel honesty should be the proper and natural way of human behavior...
You can think what you like....doesn't change reality....Wow! You really come up with some unsubstantiated crap!
*
Until you provide the link to the Hebrew translation of the relevant passages...your rhetoric means squat!Only later when we have contact with homophobic people, or homophobes in charge, especially of translations.
In this thread we have posted information about many of the ancient cultures that included homosexuality, including native Americans.
Even Roman Emperors married men. We have texts showing some early CHRISTIAN groups did not discriminate against them (obviously they didn't read those verses as being against homosexuals,) as they married homosexual couples in the church.
Read this whole thread all the way through. It is very interesting.
*