• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Bill O'Reilly correct about the African-American culture and race?

I.S.L.A.M617

Illuminatus
Why do you keep comparing drug use with homosexuality exactly?

The homosexual rights debate was the example I used because I was trying to think of something I have the same level of intolerance for that you do for drugs. The only similarities I'm drawing between the two is that any risk involved is knowingly assumed by the individuals participating, and that it's nobody else's business what somebody does in the privacy of their own home. I can't stand anti-gay protesters as much as you can't stand drug users, but I don't call for their imprisonment on the grounds that I disagree with what they choose to do with their own lives.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Actually, I should thank you for asking. It is very difficult for me to understand how other people perceive the issue if they don't ask. For what it is worth, let me assure you that I see your questions as very respectful, if occasionally puzzling. :)

And I appreciate your answering the questions. :)

You see, for reasons difficult for me to pinpoint and not entirely healthy, personal responsibility is a value that is very close to the top in my worldview.

Sure, I'm with you here. Personal responsibility is very important.

Our existence is a limited period of time during which we receive and cause impressions from the environment, including other people. During that time we go through a lot of uncertain situations and end up doing a lot of things that are not always wise, often enough without a true choice.

The end result is that we will be unfair, unwise, destructive. All that is uncertain is to which degree, and how much we will try and manage to do to compensate that.

By this duty-oriented view of mine, the very idea of using psychoactives - substances that instead of allowing one to perceive reality as it is and adjusting or learning from it "get in the way" and force different perceptions, distorted or unrelated to the actual consensual reality - is by definition an obscenity.

I was shocked to (gradually) learn that not many people think so.

I guess I'm still getting hung up here. Let me put it this way to try to clarify:

I play poker with some friends about once a month. While we're playing, I usually drink a few beers. It's not enough to get me drunk, but enough to give me a buzz. There are two reasons I do it: one, because I like the taste of beer, and two, because I like having a bit of a buzz; it's a good feeling. The buzz doesn't interfere with my perception of the universe. If one night I decided not to drink alcohol while playing poker, the experience wouldn't be drastically different. My perception of the world wouldn't be any different, and I wouldn't learn anything new or different because I was completely sober. It doesn't cause me to make unwise or destructive decisions either.

So, what in your opinion is destructive about my drinking beer in a situation like this? I guess the disconnect is that it sounds like you're focusing on times when people get really drunk or really high and do stupid things, like drive and harm others. I'm focusing more on the usual experience of getting together with people, hanging out and having a few drinks or a few puffs.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
Bill O'Reilly cares far more about whether his opinions attract an audience than he does about whether they are true or false. The man says nothing without at least one eye on his ratings.
 

I.S.L.A.M617

Illuminatus
Bill O'Reilly cares far more about whether his opinions attract an audience than he does about whether they are true or false. The man says nothing without at least one eye on his ratings.

I agree that his top priority is keeping his ratings up, but I still think O'Reilly honestly believes everything he says.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
I agree that his top priority is keeping his ratings up, but I still think O'Reilly honestly believes everything he says.

That's an interesting question. I have heard that Sean Hannity, for instance, merely pretends to believe everything he says. But I haven't heard the same thing about O'Reilly, so perhaps you're right. He strikes me as dumb enough to believe his own crap.
 

I.S.L.A.M617

Illuminatus
That's an interesting question. I have heard that Sean Hannity, for instance, merely pretends to believe everything he says. But I haven't heard the same thing about O'Reilly, so perhaps you're right. He strikes me as dumb enough to believe his own crap.

His expression while he's talking and his serious tone lead me to believe he actually believes what he's saying. O'Reilly doesn't have that over-the-top, attention whore attitude that other Fox pundits like Glen Beck do.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
That's an interesting question. I have heard that Sean Hannity, for instance, merely pretends to believe everything he says. But I haven't heard the same thing about O'Reilly, so perhaps you're right. He strikes me as dumb enough to believe his own crap.

I don't think O'Reilly is dumb at all. I think he's actually very intelligent. It's hard to say whether he believes everything he says, but if he does believe some of the crap he puts out there, I think it's more because of emotions like anger and arrogance.
 

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
That's an interesting question. I have heard that Sean Hannity, for instance, merely pretends to believe everything he says. But I haven't heard the same thing about O'Reilly, so perhaps you're right. He strikes me as dumb enough to believe his own crap.

If you watched O'Reilly years ago, his positions were actually quite a bit more varied and better articulated. I think it might be an example of someone repeating so much BS on a daily basis for so long, that they actually started believing it.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
I don't think O'Reilly is dumb at all. I think he's actually very intelligent. It's hard to say whether he believes everything he says, but if he does believe some of the crap he puts out there, I think it's more because of emotions like anger and arrogance.

I'd rank your brain power over his any day of the week. Well over his.
 

Dirty Penguin

Master Of Ceremony
Fair point. But still, TEN times more likely to be imprisoned? That's an off-the-charts ratio.

Black Americans Ten Times More Likely to be Incarcerated For Drug Use Than Whites
Black people are 10 times more likely to be imprisoned for drug offenses than white people in the United States, according to a study conducted by the Justice Policy Institute.

Blacks and whites use illegal drugs at approximately the same rates, yet both arrest and sentencing tends to be stricter for blacks, the study found.

:shrug:
 

Dirty Penguin

Master Of Ceremony
Hoodies used by Extreme criminals? What's an extreme criminal? I'd bet more extreme criminals don't wear a hoodie or look like TM.

O Reilly is my hero Zip Hoodie by joespoliticalts

O'Rielly sells hoodies.....so what should we think about him? I suspect he's part of a criminal ring of hoodie wearers...

hoodies1-e1332768945639.jpg


I'm not sure why anyone would take this man seriously....
 

Alceste

Vagabond
One might caution that some studies have indicated marijuana use has a potential downside if it is heavily used before the brain has fully formed by the age of 21 or 22. That is, its use has been associated with an increased risk of psychosis in people who were heavy users during adolescence.

That's a bit of a sketchy correlation though. People who are mentally ill have a pretty powerful inclination to self-medicate.

Of course, caution and moderation should be exercised in everything. Even water can kill you if you drink enough of it.
 

Alceste

Vagabond
Why do you keep comparing drug use with homosexuality exactly?

People are homosexual. People use psychoactives.

There is a major difference there, isn't there?

No, because he is not comparing homosexuality to drug use. He is comparing your extreme intolerance of drug use to extreme intolerance of homosexuality. Both groups of intolerant people want to impose their personal morals on others by force of law, but in your case the amount of force you desire to impose is unusually extreme.
 
Last edited:

Monk Of Reason

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
No, because he is not comparing homosexuality to drug use. He is comparing your extreme intolerance of drug use to extreme intolerance of homosexuality. Both groups of intolerant people want to impose their personal morals on others by force of law, but in your case the amount of force you desire to impose is unusually extreme.
Depending on the drug there is evidence based reasons for his/her intolerance of drug usage. There is no legitimate evidence to support bigotry of homosexuality. So there is a stark difference.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
So, it appears that some posting in this thread have decided to attack the person vice analyzing the issues he raised. Of course that seems to be the preferred method of many in this area......attack the person not the problem. Oh and just to correct some misinformation...Glenn Beck is no longer on Fox News. And another point when you make a statement and have absolutely zero proof about the statement it somewhat points to ones lack of personal responsibility and seriously damages ones credibility, if they ever had any to start with.
 
Top