They've done that with every meme used against them. They try to find a way to use it with regards to a Democrat. That's why we see all of this talk about the Democrats not being democratic regarding her nomination. The idea would never occur to them if it didn't apply to them. Trump is demented so suddenly they described Biden as demented. Trump is a rapist, so they depicted Joe as inappropriate with women. Trump failed in his self-coup, and so they describe Biden's retirement as a coup. Trump very likely used performance enhancing drugs at the debate but accused Biden of the same leading up to it (we've seen Trump without them and he can hardly articulate a coherent and comprehensible sentence in most of his campaign appearances). And on it goes.
They didn't have a choice. Joe won the primaries then announced his retirement from politics. Or did you think that they should still have given him the nomination and had his name put on ballots anyway?
It's both if you value it. I'm also an American, and it is my right to return to the States, but I have no interest in that or any of the other things that come with citizenship. It's actually a burden on me now, as I still have to file American taxes every year.
There was a time that I considered it a privilege to live there as well as a right, but now, it's just a right. If I chose to live there again for whatever reason, nobody could stop me.
Disagree. Trump will have his property confiscated if the Supreme Court doesn't run interference for him again. I call that justice. He has a debt to pay.
And price controls are useful when markets aren't free and collusion and price gouging occur. One could try to litigate that instead and break up oligopolies, but that takes years. Biden put a cap on insulin, and guess what? It's still profitable to sell it in the States. Hardly extreme.
These big businesses are not your friends no matter how cute their slogans and mascots. They don't exist for you. They exist for their owners and stockholders. We can peacefully coexist with them only if the government keeps them in check, otherwise, they'll steal your health, your labor, and your wealth.
I was, although there isn't much privilege for me any more now that I have retired from medicine and expatriated to a brown country where I have minority and immigrant status. I don't miss it because I couldn't use it anymore.
Her supporters love her. She is really very good at this. Who knew?
Uh, no. She is where she is today due to a combination of talent, hard work, and some luck.
Trump, by contrast, was a beneficiary of affirmative action in the form of a huge inheritance. He got into Wharton knowing nothing and having no academic skills whatsoever because of a wealthy father (and came out it in the same condition).
He is a man with no talents at all unless you consider grifting a talent. The reality TV show was fantasy handed to him because he already had a little celebrity status due to his flamboyant lifestyle - he's incompetent in business - and getting to the White house was with a boost from Putin and another from Comey.
https://www.npr.org/sections/money/...ich-kids-its-more-than-just-legacy-admissions
He's like Bush Jr. was: born on third base and thought he hit a triple.
Or a post turtle. When you see a turtle atop a post, you don't know how it got there, but you do know it didn't get there by itself. The same can be said of Trump. Without all of that affirmative action, he's a Wal-Mart greeter.
It looks like you and MAGA are trying to make that sound like something she should be ashamed of having said. I see a coherent and correct comment there. That is exactly what she is doing, and very well.
What do you think that means? One MAGA called it word salad because he heard the phrase used to describe it in the video he linked to from Britain and Sky News, founded by the same Rupert Murdoch that gave America Fox News and its propaganda. Those talking heads were right out of Fox News, but with British accents. They know her message wasn't word salad, but their audience is as unsophisticated as Fox News consumers and cannot generally understand intelligent speech. You've seen them at the Trump rallies. They would have no idea what those words mean, and if somebody tells them it's gibberish, they have no way to evaluate the claim.
I'm wondering if there isn't a language comprehension problem here. You've always seemed smarter to me than that, but perhaps I'm confusing you with another poster. You've gone full MAGA in this thread.
Would it help if I paraphrased her? :
As we have been reminded repeatedly by great minds, we must consider and understand our present position in terms of the past as well as the future we desire and the one we might get if we don't understand what is at stake and don't take decisive action here and now."
Again, I ask - what did her words mean to you that you offer them to demean her as if they are self-evidently nonsense needing no comment?