Is having sex without a relationship aka a one time thing a Morally wrong thing and if so why ?

[Massimo2002]

Maybe, maybe not. Some folks are far less emotional than others. It is most definitely a physical thing. In the inner teachings of Hinduism, the subtle nerve currents, called nadis, get connected with each sexual encounter, and colloquially, that may be why it's called 'connections'.

Why would someone have sex without the emotional part how is that even possible ?

 

[VoidCat]

Aromantic ?

Someone who doesn't experience romantic desire. Romance doesn't equal sex you know. And they may still feel love just not that kind of love. There's different types of love

 

[Massimo2002]

Someone who doesn't experience romantic desire. Romance doesn't equal sex you know. And they may still feel love just not that kind of love. There's different types of love

I know that there are different types of love but it's just hard to think of romance without the sex part.

 

[The Hammer]

But there's nothing wrong with being middle aged.

Never said there was. I avoid most labels unless I choose them.

 

[VoidCat]

Sometimes it can not only be an emotional but also logical. If someone doesn't feel comfortable or ready fir a romantic or long term relationship and the other person is STD free according to their medical records and both use protection and birth control methods it may work for some folk. I mean some people are aromantic but not asexual and some folk just don't want a long term romantic relationship that's ok. The only wise thing is if one decides to have a one night stand is to consider the risks mitigate them and consider the benefits if they wish to do so and their is consent on all sides.

I also will add that there's alternatives to romantic relationships and one night stands that may be more logical to some folks circumstances. Like friends with benefits for example.

I know that there are different types of love but it's just hard to think of romance without the sex part.

Well...what do you do besides have sex with a partner?

 

[The Hammer]

Why would someone have sex without the emotional part how is that even possible ?

Physical attraction and a willing partner is really all that's necessary. Emotions can take a back seat. Though not always.

 

[Massimo2002]

Physical attraction and a willing partner is really all that's necessary. Emotions can take a back seat. Though not always.

But the physical attraction requires emotion to get "turned" on or sexually excited you need to feel those emotions of lust and excitement.

 

[Massimo2002]

I also will add that there's alternatives to romantic relationships and one night stands that may be more logical to some folks circumstances. Like friends with benefits for example.


Well...what do you do besides have sex with a partner?

Ok I get what you are saying now about the partnership without the sex but what is friends with benefits ? Aren't all friendships beneficial anyway ?

 

[VoidCat]

Physical attraction and a willing partner is really all that's necessary. Emotions can take a back seat. Though not always.

But the physical attraction requires emotion to get "turned" on or sexually excited you need to feel those emotions of lust and excitement.

You also dont need the physical attraction part. If the parts work touching and stimulation will often cause the body to respond. As long as there is consent some folk do choose to sleep with folk they aint sexually attracted to. Like some asexual folk who aren't aromantic might choose to sleep with a partner that's not asexual because it makes their partner happy and in turn makes them happy.

 

[The Hammer]

But the physical attraction requires emotion to get "turned" on or sexually excited you need to feel those emotions of lust and excitement.

Not the emotions people are talking about when they mean "no emotions involved"

 

[VoidCat]

Ok I get what you are saying now about the partnership without the sex but what is friends with benefits ? Aren't all friendships beneficial anyway ?

Im assuming you arent a native english speaker? If not typically in english friends with benefits refers to a platonic relationship ie a friendship that involves sex. Yes all friendships do involve benefits but most dont involve sex.

 

[Massimo2002]

You also dont need the physical attraction part. If the parts work touching and stimulation will often cause the body to respond. As long as there is consent some folk do choose to sleep with folk they aint sexually attracted to. Like some asexual folk who aren't aromantic might choose to sleep with a partner that's not asexual because it makes their partner happy and in turn makes them happy.

So you are telling me that you can get the parts to get excited just by touching ? That doesn't make sense especially if it's done with someone who the person finds unattractive.

 

[The Hammer]

You also dont need the physical attraction part. If the parts work touching and stimulation will often cause the body to respond. As long as there is consent some folk do choose to sleep with folk they aint sexually attracted to. Like some asexual folk who aren't aromantic might choose to sleep with a partner that's not asexual because it makes their partner happy and in turn makes them happy.

That is true. Attraction isn't even really necessary.

 

[The Hammer]

Well...what do you do besides have sex with a partner?

Everything else.

 

[VoidCat]

So you are telling me that you can get the parts to get excited just by touching ? That doesn't make sense especially if it's done with someone who the person finds unattractive.

Yep. Even reach orgasm. In fact on a similar note some rape victim do experience orgasm during rape and it's not cuz they liked it but that's just how their body responded. It's also how male rape victims may get hard during the rape.

The body responses to stimulation even if attraction is not involved

 

[Massimo2002]

Not the emotions people are talking about when they mean "no emotions involved"

I suppose you could take Viagra and be without emotions but I don't think most people do that when they have sex I think it's done with emotions.

 

[VoidCat]

I suppose you could take Viagra and be without emotions but I don't think most people do that when they have sex I think it's done with emotions.

Ok so usually there's emotions involved. After all there's often a chemical reaction and all that causing pleasure and the bonding feeling. But when we say emotions we usually are talking about romantic when sex is involved and that's not needed. Many folk have sex without romance. Sex workers do it all the time and view the whole thing as part of their job and i assure you afterwards they dont think of their clients much usually unless they were ******** ie abusive towards them

 

[VoidCat]

@Massimo2002. This may help you but look up the split attraction model

 

[Vinayaka]

Why would someone have sex without the emotional part how is that even possible ?

I go to funerals and don't see it emotionally at all. There can also be some very negative emotions attached to 'sexuality', but that would depend if you see rape as sexuality. I don't. I see it as brutality.

 

[VoidCat]

I go to funerals and don't see it emotionally at all. There can also be some very negative emotions attached to 'sexuality', but that would depend if you see rape as sexuality. I don't. I see it as brutality.

Even without rape there can be negative emotions attached but it may be due to an upbringing shaming sex and maybe even other types of trauma or maybe there may be negative feelings if cheating is involved.