Spice
StewardshipPeaceIntergityCommunityEquality
So "old" is relative, but "young" is not? My joints disagree. LOL
That more than likely will change for you.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is having sex without a relationship aka a one time thing a Morally wrong thing and if so why ?
- Thread starter Massimo2002
- Start date
That more than likely will change for you.
They may or may not be mutually exclusive...I had a male acquaintance who bolstered his ego by sleeping with underage girls and married women. He also liked to 'out' the adulterous wives he slept with or so he said.... I asked him, "Why do that to a family?".....He said, "They deserved it."....He was married with four children..
Link
Massimo2002
Active Member
No young would be someone in there 20s and 30s.
Massimo2002
Active Member
That's pretty sad.
Perspective. If the other person is in their 70s or older would make some sense.
how is it not?
Some people need to find better outlets for their spiritual injuries.
Massimo2002
Active Member
Because I say it's not.
I disagree. It's all perspective. Time is circular anyways. So what's old/young?
Massimo2002
Active Member
Someone 60 and over is old and someone is young if they are 20s or 30s. And what does time is circular mean ?
For me it's not a question of morals, but a question of wisdom. Given all the varied circumstances that others have pointed out, is it a wise thing to do?
Massimo2002
Active Member
I do not know if it is a wise thing to do but I do know that it is an emotional thing to do.
This would be impossible for me to sum up neatly here.
That's certainly one perspective. Not mine though. Anyone under 55 is young. Anyone older then fifty five is a young-graduate.
Maybe, maybe not. Some folks are far less emotional than others. It is most definitely a physical thing. In the inner teachings of Hinduism, the subtle nerve currents, called nadis, get connected with each sexual encounter, and colloquially, that may be why it's called 'connections'.
Massimo2002
Active Member
Young graduate ? And why don't you believe in middle age ?This would be impossible for me to sum up neatly here.
That's certainly one perspective. Not mine though. Anyone under 55 is young. Anyone older then fifty five is a young-graduate.
VoidCat
Pronouns: he/they/it/neopronouns
Sometimes it can not only be an emotional but also logical. If someone doesn't feel comfortable or ready fir a romantic or long term relationship and the other person is STD free according to their medical records and both use protection and birth control methods it may work for some folk. I mean some people are aromantic but not asexual and some folk just don't want a long term romantic relationship that's ok. The only wise thing is if one decides to have a one night stand is to consider the risks mitigate them and consider the benefits if they wish to do so and their is consent on all sides.
Massimo2002
Active Member
Aromantic ?
Massimo2002
Active Member
But there's nothing wrong with being middle aged.Probably because that's what people want to try and classify me as