People do it to themselves all the time.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is having sex without a relationship aka a one time thing a Morally wrong thing and if so why ?
- Thread starter Massimo2002
- Start date
I must admit I'm not much of an expert on this due to lack of experience.
Last edited:
Spice
StewardshipPeaceIntergityCommunityEquality
Or one just finds it boring, not good sex.
But none of that is really part of "scoring."
And sleeping with underaged girls is sexual assault, not a one night stand between freely consenting participants.
What do you consider "scoring"?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Today is a California dreaming day. And soon it will be the coldest month (or so it seems) of the year. Juneuary. Last year there was no Juneuary. This year looks more like 2,022:
Please, Don't Let This Be Juneuary
After a particularly gloomy spring, Seattle's notoriously cold and cloudy June weather is just too much for us in 2022.
Seattle's numbers of hours at or above 70 F through May 29th over the past few years: 2015: 77 2016: 144 2017: 85 2018: 107 2019: 103 2020: 85 2021: 80 and, (drum roll), 2022: 5
The typical understanding of the term "scoring" is "having sex with someone."
It is wrong if the feelings and expectations of the people involved are not being respected.
Otherwise, I am just not seeing how it could be wrong.
Otherwise, I am just not seeing how it could be wrong.
I'm using the term, "scoring" to indicate satisfying one's ego rather than satisfying the natural attraction to bond sexually. It would be similar to putting a notch on your belt.
anotherneil
Well-Known Member
What's well done, your steak or something?So, it has nothing to do with morals. Well done.
Who ever claimed that it did have to do with morals? I didn't & it goes to my point about the lack of relevance of morals - except to religious folks.
I think you're attacking a straw man (or perhaps you're confusing me with someone else?); you're trying to fabricate a false portrayal of what I am saying to try to corrupt and to smear my reputation.
Go ahead and keep trying to spin and distort things to attack me, because I actually don't care.
I'm not what matters; the idea of religion trying to control society with its rules of morality (for having sex, or anything else) is what we're actually dealing with, here.
anotherneil
Well-Known Member
Thank you, but the post I was responding to already qualified it as some religious people.
VoidCat
Use any and all pronouns including neo and it/it's
That's lucky. I haven't had consensual sex with anyone else in person but have done some consensual stuff with a few folk virtually and have had some negative emotions. Admittedly tho I do have a history of sexual abuse and after such abuse a lot of victims will sometimes feel gross or awful in future sexual situations even if they are consensual, with a good person, and they enjoyed it. And some the scenes I have done virtually are bdsm related and involve degradation or masochism both which I enjoy but can be dark at times and bring up negative emotions.
Massimo2002
Active Member
So these virtual sex scenes didn't make you feel good ?
I'm not sure I agree with your definition, but that aside, I still don't see how sexual assault or trying to end a person's marriage would necessarily be part of having sex to satisfy one's ego.
I don't think that having sex to feel better about yourself necessarily means being disrespectful to the person you're having sex with.
VoidCat
Use any and all pronouns including neo and it/it's
I didn't say that. I enjoy them a lot else I wouldn't do them. Just sometimes I do feel negative. Most the time not however. Also emotions can be complicated sometimes I feel multiple at once.
Last edited:
If you only wanted an opinion on a specific jerk you used to know, you could have saved a lot of time by being specific in the first place. You didn't.
Instead, you spoke in generalities that:
- would apply to a range of cases that aren't really bad, and
- didn't really speak to the bad stuff that your jerk did.
I'm not following your logic.......I didn't ask for an opinion..... (paraphrasing) You had asked why a hookup is different from 'scoring'. I tried to point out that some hookups are not for what normally is innocent in that boy meets girl and nature takes its course. The point is, that hookups can be dangerous........You understood that the jerk did bad stuff. You concluded that based on my account. Therefore, I did speak to his bad stuff.......
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru
Just be safe; it is a part of life. It may not be very satisfying.
@9-10ths_Penguin ...In my last post on this thread, I wrote, "I didn't ask for an opinion". The sentence was meant as a statement of fact.It is not meant to be disrespectful.
Posting or replying is the privilege members enjoy. I am familiar with your posting history. You are intelligent and well-informed in my opinion. Criticism can be a path to improvement.
Edited
Posting or replying is the privilege members enjoy. I am familiar with your posting history. You are intelligent and well-informed in my opinion. Criticism can be a path to improvement.
Edited
Last edited:
That's fine. I intended to ignore yours.