Storm
ThrUU the Looking Glass
Indeed.Pointing out how ridicilious and disgusting the idea that torturing someone for eternity is somehow necessary doesn't imply that we're "worried" about it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Indeed.Pointing out how ridicilious and disgusting the idea that torturing someone for eternity is somehow necessary doesn't imply that we're "worried" about it.
It's not about worrying. It's about trying to understand how so many people think. If this were just a small fringe of society, it wouldn't be a big deal. But it's a huge number of people.Likewise, I'm still trying to understand why someone who does not believe in God would worry about where he was going to send them.
That said, I guess it is a mind that can disconnect its self when absolutely necessary. Let's say your children where in danger and you had to rip your adversary limb from limb to protect your little ones. If you put much thought into it, perhaps this would be unacceptable to you. If you just react, your mind disconnects and you do what ever you have to no matter how revolting.
Perhaps some minds are just twisted and enjoy the thought of eternal damnation.
Perhaps others just do what they can and leave it all to God, thus the disconnect of the mind.
Actually the brain does this automatically as a coping mechanism. Many times a person is hurt so badly, they feel no pain.
That is the best insight I can give you. The brain is very complex.
Furthermore, if something so ugly is so important to the religion, doesn't that make the religion itself despicable?
It's not about worrying. It's about trying to understand how so many people think. If this were just a small fringe of society, it wouldn't be a big deal. But it's a huge number of people.
As I said earlier in the thread:
The discussion is not pointless simply because the god does not exist.
It's important because it sheds a lot of light on human morality (or in the case of hell, the lack of morality). Describing, through logic and compassion, why people hold not only erroneous, but gravely unethical viewpoints, is very important in my opinion.
OK, I get that. But would you say Christianity falls apart without Hell? Because that's what I'm arguing against.I'm trying to be helpful.
This is part of the God Fearing Christian mentality.
Myself, I never said God was kind and gentle, perhaps you are thinking of Jesus.
God the father, the all creator, is a jealous and vengeful God.
Most Christians don't spend much time worrying about hell and when they do, they usually annoy Atheists by trying to save them from hell.
It's not like modern day Christians invented hell. We just accept the eternal hell concept.
You could say the same thing about death.
A Christian could ask you, how do you believe that when you die that is it? That seems a little upsetting too don't you think?
I'm not trying to debate, I'm really trying to explain the mindset. We accept hell as part of the package, it's not like we embrace it and rejoice about it.
OK, I get that. But would you say Christianity falls apart without Hell? Because that's what I'm arguing against.
OK, then. While we disagree on many subjects, this is not one of them.No, I don't think Christianity falls apart without hell. The LDS folks don't believe in eternal hell and they seem to be doing just fine.
I don't consider Jesus particularly kind and gentle. I think people get that impression from him by focusing only on the gentler things he said while ignoring the fairly violent things he spoke of.I'm trying to be helpful.
This is part of the God Fearing Christian mentality.
Myself, I never said God was kind and gentle, perhaps you are thinking of Jesus.
God the father, the all creator, is a jealous and vengeful God.
Most Christians don't spend much time worrying about hell and when they do, they usually annoy Atheists by trying to save them from hell.
It's not like modern day Christians invented hell. We just accept the eternal hell concept.
You could say the same thing about death.
A Christian could ask you, how do you believe that when you die that is it? That seems a little upsetting too don't you think?
I'm not trying to debate, I'm really trying to explain the mindset. We accept hell as part of the package, it's not like we embrace it and rejoice about it.
God the father, the all creator, is a jealous and vengeful God.
The concept of hell as modern Christians see it, arose during the middle ages.It's not like modern day Christians invented hell. We just accept the eternal hell concept.
And my response would be that's the reality of life. Lying about it for the sake of comfort doesn't help.A Christian could ask you, how do you believe that when you die that is it? That seems a little upsetting too don't you think?
Perhaps the package should be returned to sender.We accept hell as part of the package, it's not like we embrace it and rejoice about it.
So your god is jealous and vengeful, and you condone hell. I'm sorry to hear that, but thanks for explaining your mindset.
Because the way humans think intrigues me.I don't condone hell, I accept hell. I accept many things I have no control of like earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes.
I get the vibe that you have a problem with my beliefs. I honestly don't have a problem with what you believe or don't believe.
If I may ask a question, why do you care so much about what others believe?
No.And a follow up, do you believe people should just walk away from their beliefs just because some folks take offence to the beliefs?
Because the way humans think intrigues me.
And when it involves politics, freedom, war, or gets in the way of science, someone has to point out from time to time that the emperor has no clothes.
No.
But I hope for people to work to constantly improve themselves in terms of empathy, reason, and things like that.
This was a late addition to the Apostles Creed (which is why the United Methodist Church leaves that phrase out), and in any case, it says nothing about eternal punishment in the creed. There is more than one interpretation of the word "hell." It is a doctrine that has developed over the centuries.
Many churches allow a wide degree of interpretation of the creeds. United Methodists aren't even required to subscribe to every word of the creed (and I suspect this is true in practice of most denominations). They recite the creed as a tradition, a way of uniting with generations of Christians who have recited the same words, not as a binding dogma.
Even in the Roman Catholic Church, dogmas are ultimately mysteries into which humans will never fully enter. Dogmas are infallible, but doctrine must interpret dogma, and doctrine is fallible.
These three terms have different meanings and must be recognized.
sorry bud that is the later definition
Gehenna refers to the "Valley of Hinnon", which was a garbage dump outside of Jerusalem. It was a place where people burned their garbage and thus there was always a fire burning there. Bodies of those deemed to have died in sin without hope of salvation (such as people who committed suicide) were thrown there to be destroyed
Hell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
refers both to the ancient Greek underworld, the abode of Hades, and to the god of the underworld
Hades - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
sorry again, hades started out in the The Septuagint
Septuagint - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
your close, your just running off later material that is vague and lumps everything together
So God will destroy those who refuse to not destroy?The lake of fire isn't very different from prison, death row or execution -though no mistakes are made. For some on earth, the thought of going to jail or being executed is enough to prevent them -so fearing to do evil can be of benefit -but they should truly want to do good.
God is even more forgiving than men -and can truly know if one is rehabilitated (has truly repented). Men see no choice but to execute some people and can not know if they are no longer a threat. They will be resurrected and go before God at the judgment -and some will repent then. However, if some utterly refuse to not destroy -and cannot be changed God will execute them.
God will soon