Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't need to. The stats are doing it for me.
Sorry but people that think they are God, like you say you do, are not worthy of worship IMHO.
You look like the devil, at least your avatar does!!
We are 15 years out of the most murderous century ever, yet we have magically changed into more enlightened beings?
Again with this idea that the world is falling apart. It's the safest time to live, right now, with the most advanced human rights. You seriously think the 1900s was the "most murderous century ever" when compared with, say, Medieval times?
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...nd_lines_reveal_an_increasingly_peaceful.html
Sorry but people that think they are God, like you say you do, are not worthy of worship IMHO.
Your statistical illiteracy is doing it for you. You read far too much into short term trends.
It's like saying the high stock market from 2004-2007 'proved' we had a strong economy (as many people did say).
We are 15 years out of the most murderous century ever, yet we have magically changed into more enlightened beings?
The gnostic view that man can be saved through knowledge is as fanciful as any fundamentalist religious position.
I think there is a lot to discuss here. You aren't putting forward the right argument so it is easy to pull holes in it as you are doing.Is it moral for God to punish us?
Is it moral for an all-knowing and all-powerful God to set in motion a history that he designs and then condemns others for?
We live in a history that God has set up and is fully responsible for. God, punishing man, who can do nothing but follow God’s plan and the nature God has put in us, is having innocent people suffer for the wrongs God himself has pre-destined and which cannot be altered.
For example.
God chose to have Jesus sacrificed. God, in his planning book would also have decided who would kill Jesus. There would be no way for that man to not kill Jesus or God’s plan would fall off the rails and in this case, we would not have a messiah or scapegoat to ride into heaven.
Some will say we have free will but as shown in the example above, Jesus’ killer could not refrain from killing Jesus without derailing God’s plan. Further, to pre-destine any one action or condition within a history changes all other conditions and pre-destines all conditions within the plan. Think the butterfly effect.
Having said the above and having shown that we have no free will if anything is pre-destined, I think it would be quite immoral for God to judge or punish us for being and doing exactly what he pre-ordained for us in his plan. We have no choice and to punish us is immoral.
Do you agree?
If not, why not?
Regards
DL
I think there is a lot to discuss here. You aren't putting forward the right argument so it is easy to pull holes in it as you are doing.
I think there is a lot to discuss here. You aren't putting forward the right argument so it is easy to pull holes in it as you are doing.
Interesting pointI can't speak for DL but I think the main thrust of the idea is this...can mere humans alter the will of God?
God sent his only begotten son to Earth to die for our sins. There was a moment when Pontius Pilate asked the crowd "who shall I free" and we all know what happened next. Barabbas was freed and Jesus was executed, fulfilling God's plan to send his son to die for us.
Could the people have yelled "Free Jesus!" instead? Did they have the capability to decide, or was it just an illusion of a having a choice? Because if people truly have free will, they could have yelled "Free Jesus" and by doing so mere humans would have altered the Will of God. Seems incredible that lowly humans could be so powerful that they could change God's will with the utterance of two words. How powerful can God really be if we can change His Will on a whim?
I gave my evidence. Where is yours?
Regards
DL
Seems like a pointless question when you consider that this scene in the Gospel is a literary construct. The characters say what they do not because actual historical people said those things verbatim, but because it made for the best narrative in the eyes of the author. It's a bit like asking if characters in a novel have the free will to do things other than what the author of the novel intended.God sent his only begotten son to Earth to die for our sins. There was a moment when Pontius Pilate asked the crowd "who shall I free" and we all know what happened next. Barabbas was freed and Jesus was executed, fulfilling God's plan to send his son to die for us.
Could the people have yelled "Free Jesus!" instead? Did they have the capability to decide, or was it just an illusion of a having a choice? Because if people truly have free will, they could have yelled "Free Jesus" and by doing so mere humans would have altered the Will of God. Seems incredible that lowly humans could be so powerful that they could change God's will with the utterance of two words. How powerful can God really be if we can change His Will on a whim?
To think like you do, that the opposite would be true and that man can be saved by ignorance and lack of knowledge is quite a novel idea that you seem to want to live by.
Regards
DL
Knowledge must be combined with wisdom, compassion, empathy and virtue in order for it to make a positive change.Surely you can work out that that's not the only other option.
I quite like knowledge, I just know it can't save us. Thinking it can is the real ignorance.
Is it moral for God to punish us?
Is it moral for an all-knowing and all-powerful God to set in motion a history that he designs and then condemns others for?
We live in a history that God has set up and is fully responsible for. God, punishing man, who can do nothing but follow God’s plan and the nature God has put in us, is having innocent people suffer for the wrongs God himself has pre-destined and which cannot be altered.
For example.
God chose to have Jesus sacrificed. God, in his planning book would also have decided who would kill Jesus. There would be no way for that man to not kill Jesus or God’s plan would fall off the rails and in this case, we would not have a messiah or scapegoat to ride into heaven.
Some will say we have free will but as shown in the example above, Jesus’ killer could not refrain from killing Jesus without derailing God’s plan. Further, to pre-destine any one action or condition within a history changes all other conditions and pre-destines all conditions within the plan. Think the butterfly effect.
Having said the above and having shown that we have no free will if anything is pre-destined, I think it would be quite immoral for God to judge or punish us for being and doing exactly what he pre-ordained for us in his plan. We have no choice and to punish us is immoral.
Do you agree?
If not, why not?
Regards
DL