Consider the following situation:
Two people are at a social gathering. One, call her Shirley, is an transgender woman, the other is a straight cis-male, call him Tom. Tom approaches Shirley, believing that she is a cis-female. They flirt and Tom takes Shirley back to his place where they end up in bed together, and eventually consent to intercourse.
Later on, Tom learns through a mutual friend, John, that Shirley is in fact a transgender woman, and was assigned male gender at birth. After that, Tom is angry, and refuses to approach Shirley. He claims he feels "violated" and was was deceived, and it was unethical, because if hed known she was trans, he would not have consented to intercourse.
My questions:
- Was Tom wrong to suddenly reject Shirley on the basis that she is transgender?
- Should Shirley be obligated to tell Tom her birth gender before consent?
- Is it wrong for cisgender individuals to only prefer other cisgender individuals, to the exclusion of transgender people?
If you could explain why you answered the way that you did, that would be helpful.
Also you could imagine the situation mentioned above in reverse, but I don't think the answer should be different.