Everything has health risks, fact is the most dangerous thing you can do is living. Not saying all risks should be taken, but in the case of homosexuality and hetrosexuality (I doubt one is more risky then the other, to be honest) I would say that since they are so hardwired into us the risk is worth taking.I am a registered nurse in a public clinic. There is damage to the anal sphincter, rectal ulcers, and leakage of stool in male homosexuals. Lesbians are greatly raising their risk of cancer by not having children or nursing babies. Every time a female has a menstrual cycle her cancer risk goes up. That is why having children early and having many is good for women.
What would really make a difference in the world is not if more homosexual people try and be something they are not, what really would make a difference is if people learn to respect each other and be responsible with their partner, in bed and in life, no matter if they are of the same or of the opposite sex. That would be much more valueble for the health of the entire human race then to say that homosexual sex is harmful or wrong.
Where do sexual relations with animals fit in here ?homosexuality is harmful to the health and so is lesbianism and so is having sexual ralations with animals and so is masturbation
I think we both agree that it is something bad to have sex with animals, but it has nothing to do with homosexuality... or masturbation for that matter.