• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is The Political Future Of Elizabeth Warren Over?

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I'm looking forward to the new mandatory racial purity tests to confirm and quantify Irish decent before people are allowed to wear green or go drinking on St Patrick's day.
You really don’t get it. There’s a difference between celebrating to drink beer, and claiming a non-existent heritage to get ahead.
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Don't complain when people ask you to explain your context free random string of numbers and letters.

"California Judicial Council Civil Jury Instructions." As a search term produces about a million results, by the way. Care to be a bit more specific with your *ahem* "citation"? Is a specific link that much to ask for?
You edited after I responded. Dirty.

I gave you the cite: CACI 1900.

You still pretending to be a lawyer?
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Matter in the context of such programs, sure. But 7nless Warren was wrongfully benefitting from such a program, why is her race anyone's business but hers?

Warren became a public figure, her choice. She has used her race claims in politics, her choice. She is free game when she advertises it and used it as leverage. More so the scrutiny she faced put her claim to rest as false, her blunder.
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Don't complain when people ask you to explain your context free random string of numbers and letters.

"California Judicial Council Civil Jury Instructions." As a search term produces about a million results, by the way. Care to be a bit more specific with your *ahem* "citation"? Is a specific link that much to ask for?
You also asked about legal dictionaries. I’m just curious, what legal dictionaries are you actually familiar with? (And don’t cheat by googling them now.)
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I think I got obfuscation from someone who knows I'm right and knows no legal dictionary agrees with his definition of fraud, frankly.
I think you proved you don’t know what you’re talking about. You asked for a cite. You got one. If you don’t have the chops to pull it up that’s on you.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Warren became a public figure, her choice. She has used her race claims in politics, her choice. She is free game when she advertises it and used it as leverage. More so the scrutiny she faced put her claim to rest as false, her blunder.
How is her claim "false" though?
 

Shad

Veteran Member
I'm looking forward to the new mandatory racial purity tests to confirm and quantify Irish decent before people are allowed to wear green or go drinking on St Patrick's day.

No silly. You test people's blood-alcohol level to detect Irish heritage.
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I'm explicitly not a lawyer, which is why caci 1900 is meaningless to me. How about that link?
Oh? Not a lawyer? Big surprise. Then don’t go around asking for “legal dictionaries” if you don’t even know what you’re talking about.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Oh? Not a lawyer? Big surprise. Then don’t go around asking for “legal dictionaries” if you don’t even know what you’re talking about.
I know enough to know that the legal definition of fraud isn't what you said it was.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
She claimed her grandmother was the link when it really goes back 6 to 10 generation using South American samples. Do the math. Heck do the math on the grandmother.
What did she claim about her Grandmother specifically?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Warren became a public figure, her choice. She has used her race claims in politics, her choice. She is free game when she advertises it and used it as leverage. More so the scrutiny she faced put her claim to rest as false, her blunder.
I'd expect Democrats to find her pretense worse than blackface
because she's appropriating another's race & culture to become
a "toofer", ie, both female & Amerindian, which has great value
to a university trumpeting its diversity.
 
Top