The bottom line is any book that creates incitement are banned by the so called modern World.
While technically true, I freely admit, our systems at least allow for appeals and overturning of such decisions. Very few things remain indefinitely on a banned list. It may take years, but eventually, the public IS given access to these formerly taboo works.
We in Islam do not have a problem with those banning.
The censorship you folks are calling for is permanent ban and that is just not how things work in free and open societies.
Now if one wants to be critical of Islam then there is a red line.In other words there are limits.
And it is far more clearly adhered to that President Obama's now infamous "red lines". You know dealing with all too many Muslims is similar to dealing with alcoholics or drug addicts. You cannot help an alcoholic or a drug addict until they are willing to admit that they have a problem. When Muslims can finally admit there is a problem with Islam vs. modernity then we can begin to find solutions and negotiate (which means give and take on BOTH sides.)
There is a big difference between criticism and incitement.
Very true. Very true. The downside to this is something
you might find annoying might drive another more fanatical Muslim to strap a bomb belt onto themselves to show their displeasure.
To make a mockery of ones religious beliefs or abuse our Prophets is blatant incitement.
What is problematic here is that "your prophets" is shared by two other religions. You have laid claim to them. Only Muhammad is you own genuine exclusive prophet. For you to get excited about the prophets expropriated from other religions is a bit ludicrous especially if the followers of the others religions turn a blind eye or the other cheek....
We get that many Muslims have what certainly seem to many of us as an unhealthy fixation on the prophet-hood of Muhammad. We get that. Muslims the world over have made it painfully obvious for centuries now. Believe it or not it was this fixation on Muhammad that resulted in early "western" scholars referring to Islam is
Muhammadanism. The term was used extensively right up until the mid 1960's or so because so many confused the endless veneration of Muhammad with outright worship. It is still certainly "hero worship"...
All those books listed in the OP leads to blatant incitement.
Those of us who have been in discussions with Muslim for a very long time are little bored with the whole thing now. It almost to the point where we wonder what ISN"T blatant incitement to many Muslims. Our mere existence is a perennial thorn in your side and our immense success must really, really hurt. That you need us for so much must also hurt terribly. What happens when all the oil is gone? We won't need you for very much then.