doppelganger
Through the Looking Glass
Oh my god, La Shish is good. Too bad I don't represent auto makers any more. I miss trips to Dearborn.Ah, Dearborn.....no need to bring food when La Shish beckons.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Oh my god, La Shish is good. Too bad I don't represent auto makers any more. I miss trips to Dearborn.Ah, Dearborn.....no need to bring food when La Shish beckons.
since when are the those arrested noncombatants? they claim to be at war. I haven't seen any lay down their arms.
They are only arresting based on political action, not political opinion. Further, to assume that they Israeli government is biased is a false statement.
so still the question remains: which part of the Geneva Convention did they violate? And in what cases?A better question is what section DOESN'T Israel violate?
UN Resolution 465 said:5. Determines that all measures taken by Israel to change the physical character, demographic composition, institutional structure or status of the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem, or any part thereof, have no legal validity and that Israel's policy and practices of settling parts of its population and new immigrants in those territories constitute a flagrant violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War and also constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East;
The blockade is legal:
UN Palmer report: blockade of Gaza legal - The Drum Opinion (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
The release of the United Nations Palmer report into last year's flotilla incident aboard the Mavi Marmara has vindicated Israel by finding that its naval blockade of the Gaza strip is legal under international law. Moreover, Israel has the right to enforce that blockade - including in international waters. It has also rebutted many of the false claims and assumptions that have been made about the flotilla incident and about the broader situation in Gaza.
The Palmer report unequivocally found that: "Israel faces a real threat to its security from militant groups in Gaza. The naval blockade was imposed as a legitimate security measure in order to prevent weapons from entering Gaza by sea and its implementation complied with the requirements of international law."
The Turkish ship was nothing but a provocation and those aboard were armed. They knew and were looking for a confrontation and they got one.
yes still laughing
That's pretty much what she is saying.So unless we respect the UN, Naturei Karta, International Kangaroo Court, and the BBC, we have low standards?
So unless we respect the UN, Naturei Karta, International Kangaroo Court, and the BBC, we have low standards?
There exists no neutral body to settle regional conflicts using diplomacy. That used to be Switzerland, but you know...What is your proposed alternative to trying to settle regional conflicts with international diplomacy, treaties and enforcement bodies? What is your proposed alternative to using reputable international news organisations as a source for credible information?
What is your proposed alternative to trying to settle regional conflicts with international diplomacy, treaties and enforcement bodies? What is your proposed alternative to using reputable international news organisations as a source for credible information?
The Palmer report (which was an independent report, not a UN resolution) also found that Israel used excessive force boarding the vessels and exercised poor judgment boarding them so far outside the blockade zone.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/world/Palmer-Committee-Final-report.pdf
Funny you don't mention that part.
There exists no neutral body to settle regional conflicts using diplomacy. That used to be Switzerland, but you know...
There truly isn't a nonbiased news agency. All of them are biased in one direction or another. Credible information is a pipe dream of naive individuals.
I find it funny that you expect me to believe that an "independent review" commissioned by the said group that is being reviewed to be intellectually honest. Many other groups you cited have shown themselves to be notoriously biased against Israel on the best of days. Your bias isn't towards human rights, despite how you attempt to fool yourself. Stop playing games.And you think the BBC is biased in an anti-Israel direction? An independent review they commissioned found that both pro-Israel and pro-Palestine partisans are equally convinced it is outrageously biased to the other side.
Sounds about as impartial as you're going to get in the mainstream media.
I get a lot of my info from organizations like B'Tselem, Amnesty International, the UN and Human Rights Watch. I don't claim to be impartial (in fact I am very partial to human rights and civil liberties), but when linking stuff for normals I try to use sources most people believe to be neutral.
funny how so often Israel is at fault for failing to abide by UN resolutions, even when they do abide by them, yet other ME countries are in the right when they violate UN resolutions.
Let's not forget what happened in Guinea last year.Where was the UN on Syria's recent massacre of protesters?
Where was the UN on Iran? (Oh yeah they gave them a rights council position)
Where is the UN on Turkey's treatment of Kurds?
Where was the UN on Syria's recent massacre of protesters?
Where was the UN on Iran? (Oh yeah they gave them a rights council position)
Where is the UN on Turkey's treatment of Kurds?
I gave the url for further reading. I would say there was excessive force on both sides. Those on the boat welding their weapons and the Israeli Navy who defended themselves. Anyhow what I was posting to was to the fact that Israel has a right to blockade and is acting legally.
Funny how those defending those on the boat welding the weapons need to fall back on sarcasm.
I find it funny that you expect me to believe that an "independent review" commissioned by the said group that is being reviewed to be intellectually honest. Many other groups you cited have shown themselves to be notoriously biased against Israel on the best of days. Your bias isn't towards human rights, despite how you attempt to fool yourself. Stop playing games.