• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Italian writer against women choosing the bear: hating men has become fashionable

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I showed you yesterday that it IS widespread.
If it is so widespread...I mean...why don't you tell American men to move to Europe?
So US women will get rid of men...and will be happy.

I mean...I still recall in the early 2000s my female friends were all crazy for American guys...
they used to drive 40 miles just to date them...there was this disco next to the American Navy station...
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
If it is so widespread...I mean...why don't you tell American men to move to Europe?


It is widespread. I showed you that yesterday. And everywhere. Not just in North America. You should scroll back and read the links I provided and inform yourself.
So US women will get rid of men...and will be happy.
Silly.
I mean...I still recall in the early 2000s my female friends were all crazy for American guys...
they used to drive 40 miles just to date them...there was this disco next to the American Navy station...
Good for your friends. I don't see the relevancy.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Relevancy is that I vividly recall that none of my friends complained about these American marines' bad behavior.
They were satisfied.
Cool, so we've got a sample size of 2.

Compared to the pile of articles I provided, including polls asking women about their bad experiences with men.

Which do you think we should go with? Your two friends, or perhaps, a larger sample size, like the ones I provided?
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I think that maybe overseas heterosexual women are too harsh on men... because there is another culture, another vision of manhood.
for example...this scene. Even if it's taken from a movie, it's not considered that weird in my eyes, because in the culture of Sicilian towns, little boys could do such things with older women. To explore their heterosexuality.



US feminists would have skinned that poor boy alive. ;)
I don't know why you quoted my post because this is not a response to anything I said nor asked you.

I asked you for a larger sample size than 2, and you gave me a scene from a fictional movie where some woman is having sex with a minor??. :shrug:
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
If it is so widespread...I mean...why don't you tell American men to move to Europe?
So US women will get rid of men...and will be happy.

I mean...I still recall in the early 2000s my female friends were all crazy for American guys...
they used to drive 40 miles just to date them...there was this disco next to the American Navy station...
That's absolutely true. But I was describing what I have observed among American males.
The fact that in the movie Fifty shades of grey, Mr. Grey wanted to make the journalist sign the papers where she attested that the sex was consensual.
We are speaking of James Dornan. James Dornan!!!
For God's sake...
If James Dornan had sex with my daughter, I would pay him to thank him...

Any heterosexual woman would pay...I guess.

Yes.
There are many men-loving women...especially in my country...
and I know the author of that article has defended them numerous times...

If you want all of the American men so badly, I suppose you can try offering them money to come have sex with your daughter. (Yeah, I'm sure that'll work.)
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
I've said no such thing.

Someone said something about bears don't stop when you say stop and I was pointing out that there are men out there who also don't stop when someone says stop,
And I was pointing out that there are also men who DO stop when the woman says stop; something you cannot say about the bear
which, stay with me now, might be one of the common experiences women have had with men that precipitated this man-bear thought experiment in the first place.

Women aren't saying they'd choose the bear for no damn reason whatsoever.
No; they're saying it for a stupid reason.
And I think it's bizarre that instead of listening to us and finding out why we answer the question as we do
I already know the reason; stupidity, bigotry, and lies. I can guarantee you; any woman who says that, would react much differently if she were in actual contact with a bear than she would if she were in contact with a human male. But because of stupidity bigotry, and lies, she says otherwise.
, we just get dismissed as being absurd
As you should be,
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
And I was pointing out that there are also men who DO stop when the woman says stop; something you cannot say about the bear

No; they're saying it for a stupid reason.

I already know the reason; stupidity, bigotry, and lies. I can guarantee you; any woman who says that, would react much differently if she were in actual contact with a bear than she would if she were in contact with a human male. But because of stupidity bigotry, and lies, she says otherwise.

As you should be,
Pretty sure the person saying "No, they're saying it for a stupid reason" shouldn't be telling other people they should be dismissed for being absurd.

You have two choices. When women say they'd choose the bear, you can stop, realize "wow, I guess I didn't realize just how bad men can be to women and how often they are" and move on. Or you can tell them they're stupid, learn nothing and maybe feel undeservedly superior. I choose the former. You still have the chance to do the same.
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
And I was pointing out that there are also men who DO stop when the woman says stop; something you cannot say about the bear

No; they're saying it for a stupid reason.

I already know the reason; stupidity, bigotry, and lies. I can guarantee you; any woman who says that, would react much differently if she were in actual contact with a bear than she would if she were in contact with a human male. But because of stupidity bigotry, and lies, she says otherwise.
Let's look at some stupid bigoted stats:

Offensive attacks are very rare and include all of the killings by black bears. These are generally unprovoked predatory attacks in remote areas where bears have the least contact with people. Bears that visit campgrounds, bird feeders, and garbage cans almost never kill people, even though these bears have by far the most contact with people. The 750,000 black bears of North America kill less than one person per year on the average, while men ages 18-24 are 167 times more likely to kill someone than a black bear.
Most attacks by black bears are defensive reactions to a person who is too close, which is an easy situation to avoid. Injuries from these defensive reactions are usually minor.​
Source: How Dangerous Are Black Bears? - North American Bear Center
As you should be,
Yes, checking out stats is totally absurd. Only hateful, bigoted people women check stats.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Pretty sure the person saying "No, they're saying it for a stupid reason" shouldn't be telling other people they should be dismissed for being absurd.

You have two choices. When women say they'd choose the bear, you can stop, realize "wow, I guess I didn't realize just how bad men can be to women and how often they are" and move on. Or you can tell them they're stupid, learn nothing and maybe feel undeservedly superior. I choose the former. You still have the chance to do the same.

I think of neither thing.
I just think that if you really hate men that much...you should go ahead and become lesbian.

Remaining heterosexual and spitting on the plate you eat on...well...sounds hypocritical. Just that. :)
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
I think of neither thing.
I just think that if you really hate men that much...you should go ahead and become lesbian.

Remaining heterosexual and spitting on the plate you eat on...well...sounds hypocritical. Just that. :)
Question: regarding women who would rather run into a man in the woods than a bear--does it mean that they hate bears?

If not, then regarding women who would rather run into a bear in the woods than a man--it does not follow that they hate men.

It's a pragmatic choice--and the stats show that she would have a better chance encountering a bear than a man.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Let's look at some stupid bigoted stats:

Offensive attacks are very rare and include all of the killings by black bears. These are generally unprovoked predatory attacks in remote areas where bears have the least contact with people. Bears that visit campgrounds, bird feeders, and garbage cans almost never kill people, even though these bears have by far the most contact with people. The 750,000 black bears of North America kill less than one person per year on the average, while men ages 18-24 are 167 times more likely to kill someone than a black bear.
This probability doesn't take into account....
Population sizes.
Duration of time in contact.
Most attacks by black bears are defensive reactions to a person who is too close, which is an easy situation to avoid. Injuries from these defensive reactions are usually minor.​
Source: How Dangerous Are Black Bears? - North American Bear Center

Yes, checking out stats is totally absurd.
Where are your statistics on women meeting a man in the woods?

Your posts go beyond justifying women being deathly
frightened of being in the presence of a man. They
smack of misandry, paranoia, & really poor math skills.
 
Top