• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Italian writer against women choosing the bear: hating men has become fashionable

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
This probability doesn't take into account....
Population sizes.
Duration of time in contact.



Where are your statistics on women meeting a man in the woods?

Your posts go beyond justifying women being deathly
frightened of being in the presence of a man. They
smack of misandry, paranoia, & really poor math skills.
There is nothing in the question regarding being afraid of either men or of bears. That is your assumption that the choice is based on fear or hatred. You have to leave room for pragmatism. (Or do you think women are incapable of being pragmatic?)
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Question: regarding women who would rather run into a man in the woods than a bear--does it mean that they hate bears?

If not, then regarding women who would rather run into a bear in the woods than a man--it does not follow that they hate men.

It's a pragmatic choice--and the stats show that she would have a better chance encountering a bear than a man.
I didn't speak of the survey... specifically.

I was speaking of those feminists who affirm that all men are potential rapists.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
There is nothing in the question regarding being afraid of either men or of bears. That is your assumption that the choice is based on fear or hatred. You have to leave room for pragmatism. (Or do you think women are incapable of being pragmatic?)
I responded to your post.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I was speaking of those feminists who affirm that all men are potential rapists.
We should note that all women are potential rapists,
murderers, perjurers, thieves, scam artists, child
abusers, conspiracy theorists, Magas, & extended
warranty sellers.
Oddly, that last one is most common with women
in my experience.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
And by the way...
this survey was specifically meant to expose how far mainstream feminism has gone.

preview16.jpg
main-qimg-e3f23b065dc4bf23b81a82c79e09272b-lq
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
We should note that all women are potential rapists,
murderers, perjurers, thieves, scam artists, child
abusers, conspiracy theorists, Magas, & extended
warranty sellers.
Oddly, that last one is most common with women
in my experience.
..and Putin-lovers.
Oh...that's just me. :)
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
This probability doesn't take into account....
Population sizes.
Duration of time in contact.
Well, neither does the survey question.
Where are your statistics on women meeting a man in the woods?
I don't know those stats. If you have stats for murder and/or sexual assault occurring in the woods, I'll look at them.
Your posts go beyond justifying women being deathly
frightened of being in the presence of a man. They
smack of misandry, paranoia, & really poor math skills.
Again, that is your assumption. I'm neither misandrist nor paranoid. I've never had anyone question my math skills before, either.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Well, neither does the survey question.

I don't know those stats. If you have stats for murder and/or sexual assault occurring in the woods, I'll look at them.

Again, that is your assumption. I'm neither misandrist nor paranoid. I've never has anyone question my math skills before, either.
I've nothing to add.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
One thing that comes to mind while reading this thread is that, very often, men can be wary of other men as well. Men are not a singular collective entity or all part of the same boys' club. A smaller man might have similar misgivings about larger men, similar to what women might have. All men also have memories of being small children and having to stay out of the way of the bigger boys and even the bigger girls and adult women. That's what many learn early in life and may condition them to violence as they grow into adults.

I recall one time I was with my mom. I was around 7 or 8, kind of small and skinny. (I didn't start to sprout until my teens, when I grew to be 6'4", stronger than average, and with reasonable fighting skill. Not Chuck Norris, but I probably could have made short work out of Johnny Lawrence of the Cobra Kai.) However, when I was a little kid and walking with my mom, who was in her mid thirties at the time and attractive to males, there were two young men in a parking lot ogling her, catcalling, and stalking us. My mom acted as if she didn't even see or hear them, perhaps as her way of dealing with the situation. I was somewhat fearful and kept looking back. They stopped pursuing at some point, and my mom and I safely entered the store we were going to. But I was worried. I knew that I could not protect her from two larger men, and she could not protect me either. We were in a vulnerable, scary situation. I realized that I needed to be bigger, stronger, faster, and tougher to be less vulnerable.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
And I was pointing out that there are also men who DO stop when the woman says stop; something you cannot say about the bear
I've personally had four different men not stop when I've said stop. I daresay I'm not the only woman to experience this and I daresay this may have something to do with this thought experiment.
No; they're saying it for a stupid reason.
I provided a list of reasons earlier in the thread. You think those are stupid reasons? ReallY?
I already know the reason; stupidity, bigotry, and lies. I can guarantee you; any woman who says that, would react much differently if
she were in actual contact with a bear than she would if she were in contact with a human male. But because of stupidity bigotry, and lies, she says otherwise.
Look at what you just did there. I asked you to listen and pay closer attention to what we're trying to say. Us women get the chance to share our fears via this thought experiment, and what we do get in response?

"You're stupid."
"You're a bigot."
"You're a liar."
As you should be,

Cool, thanks for really listening and getting the point. :rolleyes:
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I've personally had four different men not stop when I've said stop. I daresay I'm not the only woman to experience this and I daresay this may have something to do with this thought experiment.

I provided a list of reasons earlier in the thread. You think those are stupid reasons? ReallY?

Look at what you just did there. I asked you to listen and pay closer attention to what we're trying to say. Us women get the chance to share our fears via this thought experiment, and what we do get in response?

"You're stupid."
"You're a bigot."
"You're a liar."


Cool, thanks for really listening and getting the point. :rolleyes:
In an interview from my country, a girl said: I'd rather be mauled by a bear than meeting a random stranger man in the wood.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I've personally had four different men not stop when I've said stop.
When guys don't honor their partner saying "Stop"
this is typically an intimate situation. I say that it
doesn't apply to a woman who happens upon a
random guy in the woods hiking, hunting, gathering,
or just enjoying nature.
I've had women hit me, defraud me, rob me, &
perpetrate other awful things. Yet I don't worry
about it happening when I meet a female fellow hiker
in the woods. I've also had guys assault me....but
never in the woods.
The most dangerous animal I ever met (Mrs Revolt
was with me) was a bison.....we encountered many
in our path. We were very very careful to avoid them.
And yet.....no bison had ever attacked us before.
Thoughtful judgement is most useful.
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
Who? The guy the trans woman encounters in the woods? I'm not really concerned with him.
So if the male identifies as a woman, you believe he becomes safe?
Pretty sure the person saying "No, they're saying it for a stupid reason" shouldn't be telling other people they should be dismissed for being absurd.
Maybe the guy saying “no they’re saying it for a stupid reason” knows the women saying this has not had contact with a bear in the forest, and does everything to stay away from bears, but nothing to stay away from men
You have two choices. When women say they'd choose the bear, you can stop, realize "wow, I guess I didn't realize just how bad men can be to women and how often they are" and move on. Or you can tell them they're stupid, learn nothing and maybe feel undeservedly superior. I choose the former. You still have the chance to do the same.
What about if it were a white woman who had been assaulted by a black man? Would you find it reasonable for her to assume all black men are dangerous? Would you suggest all black men reflect and say “wow I didn’t realize just how bad black men can be, and how often we are?” Or would you accuse her of bigotry.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
According to American feminists' definition of "sexual assault" , this girl is sexually assaulting this Swiss Guard.
;)

 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
I think of neither thing.
I just think that if you really hate men that much...you should go ahead and become lesbian.

Remaining heterosexual and spitting on the plate you eat on...well...sounds hypocritical. Just that. :)
This is exactly why I suggested stopping and listening. If you did, you'd realize this misconstruing of the subject is silly. Being wary of men in general because of a lot of bad experiences with them in the course of your life doesn't mean you hate men or want to be a lesbian. It just means you and other women have had a lot of bad experiences with men.

And when you realize that, you can then shift your blame onto the men for creating those bad experiences, rather than blame women for men's bad behavior, as you're doing here.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
So if the male identifies as a woman, you believe he becomes safe?
A male doesn't identify as a woman. You're not making sense here. If you're trying to talk about trans women, then do that.
Maybe the guy saying “no they’re saying it for a stupid reason” knows the women saying this has not had contact with a bear in the forest, and does everything to stay away from bears, but nothing to stay away from men
If you'd care to restate this so it makes sense, I'd be happy to engage with it.
What about if it were a white woman who had been assaulted by a black man? Would you find it reasonable for her to assume all black men are dangerous? Would you suggest all black men reflect and say “wow I didn’t realize just how bad black men can be, and how often we are?” Or would you accuse her of bigotry.
It depends on a lot of things. The first thing is that women don't assume all men are dangerous. They just don't assume that every strange man they meet is safe. Second, why only Black men?
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Your posts go beyond justifying women being deathly
frightened of being in the presence of a man. They
smack of misandry, paranoia, & really poor math skills.
They do nothing of the kind. What would be preferable is to actually engage with the points being made, rather than lobbying wild accusations. If you take issue with the stats posted, then engage with that. You brought up the point that one of the stats didn't take into account the population sizes involved, which is valid. Stick to that kind of thing.
 
Top