mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
So you think I can't bring up the NATO's crimes in Libya because NATO has nothing to do with Ukraine, right?
Shall I believe that NATO is not behind this horrific war in Ukraine?
Libya was an UN action.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So you think I can't bring up the NATO's crimes in Libya because NATO has nothing to do with Ukraine, right?
Shall I believe that NATO is not behind this horrific war in Ukraine?
What changes?Libya was an UN action.
I have never meant American citizens.My opinion in the post you're quoting was more about America than it was about Europe. @Estro Felino suggested that Americans actually want to get Europe into war so the US can justify maintaining an active military presence (and it's quite likely that America's ruling class does want that).
Ordinary Americans didn't want all those wars in the Middle East either...for sure.My view is that I don't believe most ordinary Americans actually want that, but they have been convinced and strongly persuaded that it's necessary for European security.
Because the US is not a monolith.My opinion about Europe is that they talk out of both sides of their mouth much of the time.
I have always pointed out that I was talking about the élites.Half the time, they express contempt, scorn, and mockery of America, while the other half of the time, they say "We need America! Please save us from the boogieman!"
What changes?
The NATO was sent there.
Yes, as a result of an UN mandate. But not only NATO did partake and not all of NATO took part.
So it wasn't really a NATO thing as such. Rather NATO did the practical part, but didn't start it or declared the action as such. That was the UN.
My country is a NATO founding member.
But now the NATO makes me sick.
...
As usual...you didn't comment the video posted.So was my country, dearest. Yeah, NATO makes me glad sometimes.
As usual...you didn't comment the video posted.
As usual...you didn't comment the video posted.
Europeans love the United States.
The problem is that the élites push for war, also by brainwashing the American people and convincing them that war is inevitable.
The US presence in Europe was meant as defense against future wars started by non-Europeans. Or future attacks.
That means that the NATO should be the first to promote peace. And yet Iraq, Libya, Syria show otherwise.
I used to go out with American soldiers from a US air station in Sicily.
That video demonstrates that the NATO is in on it,So now I did. I am sorry that NATO didn't support Ukraine more before 2022. There, that is a different opinion than yours and it changes nothing at all as such.
That video demonstrates that the NATO is in on it,
The NATO does want Ukraine to use weapons since 2014. And to reject the diplomatic ways.
I did speak with those guys from the Naval Air Station.I guess I was fortunate enough to be born and raised at a time when such brainwashing and mental conditioning were considered wrong. I was exposed to many different and contradictory viewpoints that no actual "brainwashing" ever took hold with me.
View attachment 96660
The US began a permanent presence in Europe following WW2. We were already put into a warmongering state of mind, fueled by Axis aggression and intensified by Red Scare propaganda and fears that the "evil empire" was coming to get us. After WW2, Patton famously declared that we "fought the wrong enemy."
Most of my criticisms of US foreign policy have revolved around the inconsistency, the incoherency, and the lack of any firm political or moral principles in what we do. This means that our leaders are either a bunch of incompetent dolts who don't know what they're doing, or they've been lying all along about US foreign policy aspirations and national security interests.
Appeasing tyrants and terrorists is ****-poor "diplomacy" that would set very dangerous precedents.That video demonstrates that the NATO is in on it,
The NATO does want Ukraine to use weapons since 2014. And to reject the diplomatic ways.
Appeasing tyrants and terrorists is ****-poor "diplomacy" that would set very dangerous precedents.
Italy would have violated article 11 even if she had fought on Russia's side.
The only ways allowed are sanctions and diplomacy.
And bargaining.
You probably defend Stoltenberg because he's from the Scandinavian area.No, we don't know that and you have even admitted that yourself. Please stop doing this. You admit one thing and then you turn around and in effect do the contradictory thing.
You probably defend Stoltenberg because he's from the Scandinavian area.
The truth is that with that declaration, he is basically justifying Putin.
Because Putin must have felt threatened by the NATO aiding and abetting Ukraine's warlike aspirations.
So the NATO started it...in the eyes of Russians.
I was kinda missing it.Yeah, this time you get a whatever.