That's a very convenient interpretation. Who was the first to teach that?I am absolutely sure. I even posted a thread about this some time ago.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's a very convenient interpretation. Who was the first to teach that?I am absolutely sure. I even posted a thread about this some time ago.
No, Baha'u'llah never said that. All he ever claimed to be was the messenger of God for this age. He acknowledged the messengers of the past and he said more messengers of God would come in the future.Oh, what I meant was that he was the one who said that HE and no one else was the one...
You are correct. Jesus did not glorify Himself, but ironically, Christians glorify Jesus, since they believe that Jesus is God, and I consider that an abomination.Jesus didn't glorified himself. God acknowledged him directly and several times in front of other humans, speaking with his own voice from heaven. That is why we have such confidence in him.
Baha'u'llah did not glorify Himself. He glorified only God.Instead, BahaUllah glorified himself.
The first to teach what?That's a very convenient interpretation. Who was the first to teach that?
So he is not the one, but a different one in the future. Probably a Bahai, right?No, Baha'u'llah never said that. All he ever claimed to be was the messenger of God for this age. He acknowledged the messengers of the past and he said more messengers of God would come in the future.
Oh, yes. The Bible says that:Ironically, it is Christians who say that Jesus and no none else is the one. Jesus never said that He was the only one for all time.
Of course not. It would have been too suspicious, like the case of Smith and your prophet, I'm sorry.You are correct. Jesus did not glorify Himself,
No all Christians. We, Jehovah's witnesses don't do that. But there are many others who do not believe that either.but ironically, Christians glorify Jesus, since they believe that Jesus is God, and I consider that an abomination.
Yes he did. You just said it when you said: "All he ever claimed to be was the messenger of God for this age."... almost nothing (sarcasm).Baha'u'llah did not glorify Himself.
The first to teach that BahaUllah is "the Son of Man" who Jesus Christ says would come to judge the world from heaven.The first to teach what?
You misinterpreted what I wrote.So he is not the one, but a different one in the future. Probably a Bahai, right?
"there is no salvation in anyone else, for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must get saved.”Oh, yes. The Bible says that:
Acts 4:8 Then Peter, filled with holy spirit, said to them:
“Rulers of the people and elders, 9 if we are being examined today about a good deed to a crippled man, and you want to know who made this man well, 10 let it be known to all of you and to all the people of Israel that in the name of Jesus Christ the Naz·a·reneʹ, whom you executed on a stake but whom God raised up from the dead, by means of him this man stands here healthy in front of you. 11 This is ‘the stone that was treated by you builders as of no account that has become the chief cornerstone.’ 12 Furthermore, there is no salvation in anyone else, for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must get saved.”
No, Jesus did not glorify Himself because He did not believe he was who Christians believe He was, the Christ according to Paul.Of course not. It would have been too suspicious, like the case of Smith and your prophet, I'm sorry.
Even if you do not believe that Jesus is God you are glorifying Jesus whenever you say that Jesus is the only way to God for all time.No all Christians. We, Jehovah's witnesses don't do that. But there are many others who do not believe that either.
Claiming to be the messenger of God for this age is not glorifying Himself.Yes he did. You just said it when you said: "All he ever claimed to be was the messenger of God for this age."... almost nothing (sarcasm).
Baha'u'llah was the first to explain what is meant by the Son of man in heaven.The first to teach that BahaUllah is "the Son of Man" who Jesus Christ says would come to judge the world from heaven.
How convenient interpretation! Don't you suspect even a little bit?
no he had it wrong .coming in the clouds means its not seen ,it means not visible to the eye . but because of the things happening we would know he has returned and is presentSon of man coming in the clouds of heaven means that the return of the Christ Spirit promised in the Bible will be made manifest from the heaven of the will of God, and will appear in the form of a human being.
What about the verse in the Bible that says that every eye shall see Him?no he had it wrong .coming in the clouds means its not seen ,it means not visible to the eye . but because of the things happening we would know he has returned and is present
And what about the "cometh with clouds" part?What about the verse in the Bible that says that every eye shall see Him?
Revelation 1:7 KJ21
Behold, He cometh with clouds, and every eye shall see Him, and they also who pierced Him; and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of Him. Even so. Amen.
are you saying you cant see him ?i see him .the JW's see him .could it be you dont understand ?What about the verse in the Bible that says that every eye shall see Him?
Revelation 1:7 KJ21
Behold, He cometh with clouds, and every eye shall see Him, and they also who pierced Him; and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of Him. Even so. Amen.
Of course he did ... for his followers, not for Jesus' followers.Baha'u'llah was the first to explain what is meant by the Son of man in heaven.
No, but because he didn't really needed. God did that for him:No, Jesus did not glorify Himself because He did not believe he was who Christians believe He was, the Christ according to Paul
Son of man coming with the clouds means that the return of Christ will appear in the form of another human being. The term “clouds” as used in the Bible means those things that are contrary to the ways and desires of men. Just like the physical clouds prevent the eyes of men from beholding the sun, these things hindered men from recognizing the return of Christ.And what about the "cometh with clouds" part?
No, I am saying that we could see him.are you saying you cant see him ?
Who do you and the JWs see?i see him .the JW's see him .could it be you dont understand ?
nopeSon of man coming with the clouds means that the return of Christ will appear in the form of another human being. The term “clouds” as used in the Bible means those things that are contrary to the ways and desires of men. Just like the physical clouds prevent the eyes of men from beholding the sun, these things hindered men from recognizing the return of Christ.
In other words, the judgment of most people was clouded when Christ returned and it is still clouded for most people.
One thing that clouds the judgment of Christians is their desire for the same Jesus to return to earth.
The Spiritual Meaning and Symbolism of Clouds
Learn about the spiritual and symbolic meaning of clouds in the Bible and the Baha'i Faith.bahaiteachings.org
Baha'u'llah's explanation was for anyone who cared to read it.Of course he did ... for his followers, not for Jesus' followers.
That's true.No, but because he didn't really needed. God did that for him:
yepnope
Interesting, that according to Bahais the "clouds" are metaphorical, but the "eyes seeing" is literal ...nope
Also the theory of the evolution.Baha'u'llah's explanation was for anyone who cared to read it.