Trailblazer
Veteran Member
That is meaningless without an example.something i am seeing about the Baha'i ,if the scriptures were to be say ,it go's to the left .the Baha'i would be saying see its says it go's to the right.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That is meaningless without an example.something i am seeing about the Baha'i ,if the scriptures were to be say ,it go's to the left .the Baha'i would be saying see its says it go's to the right.
@cataway , are you saying that you do not believe that those that are not meek will be taken out?No that's just a brother making a comment.
Taken out to where? Taken along to where?why would the not meek be taken out? the meek would be taken along (Matthew 24:40)
what ?you being Baha'i cant invent what it means ?Taken out to where? Taken along to where?
These verses are about what will happen when Christ returns.
Matthew 24
37 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,
39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
40 Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
41 Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
42 Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.
40 Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
41 Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
These verses are about as clear as mud. Taken where? Left where? The verses do not say.
I know what it means to me, generally speaking. I was asking what it means to you.what ?you being Baha'i cant invent what it means ?
Does it matter whether one provides evidence(s) or not as to why their Holy Book is inspired by God?In the last few days I have given evidence of why I believe the Holy Bible is the inspired word of God.
Could you please provide your list of evidence, why you believe your Holy Scriptures are inspired by God?
There is 10,000 different religions in the world, I really don't think the evidence stacks up the same for each one of them, do you?
so you can say the opposite ?I know what it means to me, generally speaking. I was asking what it means to you.
So what if I do?so you can say the opposite ?
Jesus did NOT ALWAYS consider Peter's answer correct. In fact, it was Jesus himself who considered Peter's answer correct all along... not just Peter's.Once again you contradict yourself. Did you read Matthew 16:13-17?
...Jesus does NOT admonish Peter for using his own words. In fact, he praises Peter because he realizes the work of revelation that has taken place in him.
So the idea of "Jesus Words Alone!" is simply not supported by scripture...
You are considering "contradictory doctrine" Jesus' words:... a contradictory doctrine.
if you are saying no @Trailblazer will be saying yes there are.@Trailblazer do you believe there are demons?
I'm waiting for her answer.if you are saying no @Trailblazer will be saying yes there are.
I think research by honest ones show what is there. And what is not there. Such as the original manuscripts are obviously not there, but have been copied over the years. Translations have also their differences, to note the Greek Septuagint.Does it matter whether one provides evidence(s) or not as to why their Holy Book is inspired by God?
The Bible is made up of the Old Testament and the New Testament. The gap between the OT and the NT is roughly about 400 years.
So the more important question is - through the passages of time, do you think the ‘inspired word of God’ Scripture cannot be misinterpreted/altered (intentionally or not) by man?
None of that matters anyway. It doesn't determine the outcome of anything.I think research by honest ones show what is there. And what is not there. Such as the original manuscripts are obviously not there, but have been copied over the years. Translations have also their differences, to note the Greek Septuagint.
It can help honest hearted ones to see what's going on though.None of that matters anyway. It doesn't determine the outcome of anything.
To which, even if that is true, still determines...nothing.It can help honest hearted ones to see what's going on though.