Well trans-activists would like us to believe claims like:
- some men have vaginas
- some women have penises
And so forth. These are examples of dangerous post-truth, post-modern utterances.
That’s been a thing since before “trans activism” actually.
Cancer comes to mind immediately and interestingly enough injuries that were ahem acquired during war. (In this instance, the Iraq war.)
I recall when I was in school there was something of an “awareness campaign” which sought to get us to have compassion towards people who were injured during said war. One of the topics that came up (not sure if this was actually planned or just arose due to teens asking probing questions) was that of people who err “lost their equipment” due to such injuries, if you catch my drift?
The idea behind this and other known instances of “lost equipment” was to foster the idea that genitalia isn’t actually the be all or end all of one’s identifying sex. That there are instances where this can get “murky.”
At this point in time, I don’t recall society (at least not in Australia) being overly concerned with or even acknowledging the trans community to any degree.
Though I will note that my biology class did very much stress the idea of sex and gender being different concepts. And that biological sex was far more complicated than mere chromosomes and/or genitalia alone (referring to known biological outcomes that differed from 100% male/female.)
And I went to high school in the early 2000s!