Desert Snake
Veteran Member
He was Mary's son, too. That's human.
How on earth do you come to that conclusion?
The question is rather how isn't it a Triune?
God, The 'Son',/son in this context isn't literal son, as it was the Spirit
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
He was Mary's son, too. That's human.
How on earth do you come to that conclusion?
Very simply, the Bible never teaches of a triune (i.e. three-in-one) God. It teaches of three physically distinct persons: a divine Father, a divine Son, and a divine Holy Spirit, each of whom is perfectly and absolutely united in will, purpose, mind, and heart, and all of whom share all of the attributes of divinity.The question is rather how isn't it a Triune?
I'm sorry, but you lost me. Not trying to be difficult, but could you elaborate on this statement. I'm just not following wht you are trying to say.God, The 'Son',/son in this context isn't literal son, as it was the Spirit
Very simply, the Bible never teaches of a triune (i.e. three-in-one) God. It teaches of three physically distinct persons: a divine Father, a divine Son, and a divine Holy Spirit, each of whom is perfectly and absolutely united in will, purpose, mind, and heart, and all of whom share all of the attributes of divinity.
That's a trinity, basically. The communication breakdown here is that you seem to think that because God, Yeshua, and the Spirit are all different, they can't be connected ..the term "trinity" simply explains the connectivity of the Godhead, or Triune.
I'm sorry, but you lost me. Not trying to be difficult, but could you elaborate on this statement. I'm just not following wht you are trying to say.
I was simply explaining the makeup of the Triune to you, look, whether you want to say trinity or not, your definition that you provided yourself means trinity,...
Okay, it's "a trinity" but it's not "the Trinity" as defined by the 4th and 5th century creeds.That's a trinity, basically.
Excuse me? I just got through saying that they are "perfectly and absolutely united in will, purpose, mind, and heart." If that's not "connected," I don't know what is?The communication breakdown here is that you seem to think that because God, Yeshua, and the Spirit are all different, they can't be connected ..the term "trinity" simply explains the connectivity of the Godhead, or Triune.
I'll go with "godhead," simply because I don't accept the Nicene or Athanasian Creeds as being inspired of God or in accordance with His will. On the other hand, Spanish Mormons use the word "Trinidad" to mean "Godhead," so to that extent, I would agree that there is a "trinity" of persons, each of whom is divine.I was simply explaining the makeup of the Triune to you, look, whether you want to say trinity or not, your definition that you provided yourself means trinity,...
God don't lie, man does.
Fabrication -
2.something fabricated, esp. an untruthful statement: His account of the robbery is a complete fabrication
Evidence -
1.that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof. 2.something that makes plain or clear; an indication or sign: His flushed look was visible evidence of his fever.
So, no objective proof that Joseph Smith is a prophet?
Awesome.
I really don't like putting Joseph on a pedastal.
One of his fruits? Polygamy. I have a lot of questions about JS's personal experiences with this and how his actions opened the door for Warren Jeffs.
Probably not the answer you were looking for from a member - but I've got to be honest.
Quite apt when applied to the many allegations of Joseph Smith.
As a Mormon woman, I have absolutely no problem with gay marriage. I do, however, have a problem with lies. Any Mormon man who takes a second wife (of any age ) is promptly excommunicated. The same Church which fought against Prop 8 does not permit the practice of polygamy. Period. Not to mention the fact that this has nothing whatsoever to do with the OP. Nice try, though.Funny thing is, the Mormon Church has been one of the biggest opponents of gay marriage. You can marry 34 women if you want (some of them as young as 14 or even cheating on their husbands with you,) but God forbid you settle down with one man, because that's what's destroying the sanctity of marriage.
I see. So if an original manuscript no longer exists, it obviously never existed. Seriously? Do you know how many ancient writings you're going to have to start insisting never existed in the first place?"The Golden Plates? Uh...they just kinda...umm... floated back into heaven. Yeah...that...that's what happened."
Yeah, kind of like the stone tablets the Ten Commandments were written on. If they're not in some museum somewhere, they obviously never existed.
As a Mormon woman, I have absolutely no problem with gay marriage. I do, however, have a problem with lies. Any Mormon man who takes a second wife (of any age ) is promptly excommunicated. The same Church which fought against Prop 8 does not permit the practice of polygamy. Period. Not to mention the fact that this has nothing whatsoever to do with the OP. Nice try, though.
I don't care what religion you practice or if you don't practice any religion at all. That's entirely immaterial. You simply don't believe te golden plates ever existed, and that's your prerogative. The fact that we don't have them today means nothing. Hundreds upon hundreds of ancient documents are lost forever to us. That doesn't mean they "floated up to heaven." Sorry, but that was an extremely juvenile response. I'm sure you can do better.I do not practice any of the Abrahamic religions anyway, so the Ten Commandments are just as irrelevant.
As a Mormon woman, I have absolutely no problem with gay marriage. I do, however, have a problem with lies. Any Mormon man who takes a second wife (of any age ) is promptly excommunicated. The same Church which fought against Prop 8 does not permit the practice of polygamy. Period. Not to mention the fact that this has nothing whatsoever to do with the OP. Nice try, though.
He literally said that Moroni took the plates back to heaven, but OK.I don't care what religion you practice or if you don't practice any religion at all. That's entirely immaterial. You simply don't believe te golden plates ever existed, and that's your prerogative. The fact that we don't have them today means nothing. Hundreds upon hundreds of ancient documents are lost forever to us. That doesn't mean they "floated up to heaven." Sorry, but that was an extremely juvenile response. I'm sure you can do better.
Funny thing is, the Mormon Church has been one of the biggest opponents of gay marriage. You can marry 34 women if you want (some of them as young as 14 or even cheating on their husbands with you,) but God forbid you settle down with one man, because that's what's destroying the sanctity of marriage.
So, no objective proof that Joseph Smith is a prophet?
Awesome.
For the record, I believe religion should be able to define "marriage" however it wants, and that the government should get out of the marriage business and perform only civil unions. But I digress, this thread isn't about that.