Sand Dancer
Currently catless
I have not said that gay relationship should be criminalized because I don't consider homosexuality to be a crime but rather mental disorder.
Really? I didn't realize we had meds for that.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I have not said that gay relationship should be criminalized because I don't consider homosexuality to be a crime but rather mental disorder.
Not sure.
But in a free society information should ideally be….well freely given honestly. I mean right?
An uneducated society is one that is easily controlled, after all
Off the rails agian.They serve a great and tremendous service to the community. To say they aren't a valid function of the government is to deny the invaluable services libraries provide to the communities, and the Constitutionally the government is charged with promoting the general welfare of the public. If you think books are all a library does you haven't spent much time in them and don't know much about their operations and all the services they provide. Myself, right now I don't have a functioning printer at home so in addition to books the library is a cheap place to get necessary things printed.
And I still say that people need to grow the hell up and make it a point to read a book of opposing viewpoints that discusses a topic where one of those sides is really going to **** them off.
There is a lengthy discussion about this in the thread, I don't feel like going over it again and I already said it's not wise to debate over this but I was provoked to debate it,How you may consider me to be "mentally disordered" is -- I think you should know this, because it is a fact -- thoroughly offensive.
There are obviously no magic drugs, but lack of drugs doesn't make diagnosis go away.Really? I didn't realize we had meds for that.
Mental disordersBefore I go off to look through the APA website for sources on what a mental disorder is will you give a defination of mental disorder from a reliable source(preferably from a medical source) and how it supports your argument that homosexuality is a mental disorder
There is a lengthy discussion about this in the thread, I don't feel like going over it again
You can't make a diagnosis with a dictionary.There is a lengthy discussion about this in the thread, I don't feel like going over it again and I already said it's not wise to debate over this but I was provoked to debate it,
long story short here is link:
What is SOCIOPATHIC PERSONALITY DISTURBANCE? (Psychology Dictionary)
btw. "mental disorder" doesn't mean one is "crazy", unfortunately society categorizes people as such, but this is not reason to make politics influence doctors.
There are obviously no magic drugs, but lack of drugs doesn't make diagnosis go away.
I notice you didn't answer my question on your "Psychological Dictionary" (and why the APA has one of their own that doesn't seem to jibe) -- and that's the same question that @RayofLight also just asked.There is a lengthy discussion about this in the thread, I don't feel like going over it again and I already said it's not wise to debate over this but I was provoked to debate it,
long story short here is link:
What is SOCIOPATHIC PERSONALITY DISTURBANCE? (Psychology Dictionary)
btw. "mental disorder" doesn't mean one is "crazy", unfortunately society categorizes people as such, but this is not reason to make politics influence doctors.
There are obviously no magic drugs, but lack of drugs doesn't make diagnosis go away.
Sadly, you're wrong -- when you want to make a "diagnosis" badly enough, any source that gives you what you want is quite adequate.You can't make a diagnosis with a dictionary.
Once again, that does not help you here.
Hey with the whole there's a lengthy discussion thing i wasn't asking about sociopathic personality disorders. I was asking about what your defination of mental disorder is and how that defination fits homosexuality.
Doesn't link I gave you answer that question?I was asking about what your defination of mental disorder is.
Ah sorry I didn't see, you asked:I notice you didn't answer my question on your "Psychological Dictionary"
Does the American Psychological Association (APA) recognize this "dictionary?" I generally trust sources that come from the vast majority of practitioners in any field than a supposedly "authoritative" text written (as this one is) by a very few.
I ask, of course, because I'm aware that the APA has its own Dictionary of Psychology, and it does not say anything like your source.
You did. And I just read it.Doesn't link I gave you answer that question
A mental disorder is characterized by a clinically significant disturbance in an individual’s cognition, emotional regulation, or behaviour. It is usually associated with distress or impairment in important areas of functioning. There are many different types of mental disorders. Mental disorders may also be referred to as mental health conditions. The latter is a broader term covering mental disorders, psychosocial disabilities and (other) mental states associated with significant distress, impairment in functioning, or risk of self-harm. This fact sheet focuses on mental disorders as described by the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11).
heh, mental disorder doesn't mean all that at once but rather one or more of these.How does homosexuality cause distrubance in behavior, cognition, and/or emotional regulation? And how does it impair functioning, cause self harm and/or distress?
APA Dictionary of PsychologyA decrement in the body’s typical physiological or psychological functioning
heh, mental disorder doesn't mean all that at once but rather one or more of these.
In regard to homosexuality I think "impairment" is best description of it: (impairment is mentioned in definition)
APA Dictionary of Psychology
Ah. So that huge contingent of gay activists overcame the scientific training of the more than 120,000 members of the APA, but your "Free Online" Psychological Dictionary, which doesn't name it's contributors or number them, was immune from such pressures.Obviously as we already talked in this thread the APA was influenced by gay activists and had "homosexuality" removed from their dictionary, but otherwise there is no other difference.
From my understanding not all associations are affected, ex. protests in the US likely had no influence on other countries, but I never investigated this.
Whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire. Matthew 5:22Off the rails agian.
Being left handed is not impairment or decrement in the body’s typical physiological functioning.Again how does it impair function? It's not typical sure but left handedness is not typical but not considered an impairment in function.
Indeed it's funny how the public can influence profession.Ah. So that huge contingent of gay activists overcame the scientific training of the more than 120,000 members of the APA, but your "Free Online" Psychological Dictionary, which doesn't name it's contributors or number them, was immune from such pressures.
That is historically inaccurate. It was a resounding vote to strike it because it had been realized homosexuality isn't a disorder.Obviously as we already talked in this thread the APA was influenced by gay activists and had "homosexuality" removed from their dictionary, but otherwise there is no other difference.
Neither is homosexuality. You have yet to show me it's an impairmentBeing left handed is not impairment or decrement in the body’s typical physiological functioning.
Also definition likely changed over time and will likely change in the future.
I was simply point out again that your post was very far off topic and filled with assumptions.Whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire. Matthew 5:22
I'll just take that as you can't offer any proper rebuttal so you must resort the tactics of the defeated.