• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"Make Rape Legal" Men's Group Plans Events in 43 Countries for Saturday

Do you think we should teach men not to rape?


  • Total voters
    36

Thanda

Well-Known Member
I don't see that proving your point. We'll have to agree to disagree I guess.

Your 9 months pregnant is simply a possible scenario. Many rapes don't result in pregnancy, in fact most don't. And there are rapists who even use condoms. There are just so many different possibilities. So how then do you decide that something so complex and variable has one solution - capital punishment? It simply doesn't make sense; Unless you made every type of assault punishable by death. Then it still not wouldn't make sense, but at least you would be consistent.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
And therefore, having the death penalty for rape, without qualifying what kind of rape under what circumstances is illogical.
I don't support the death penalty for rape, but rape is rape. There are different circumstances, but they are all rape. Sentencing shouldn't be based on the victim's psychological strength and ability to recover, or how badly injured they are, but solely on the fact that the attacker committed a rape. I don't agree with the death penalty, but I do support chemical castration (or physical, if the offender chooses).
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
It isn't criminal to advocate legalization of brutality & assault.
It would be a very different story if it was aimed at government officials. There would be consequences if a group tried to legalize egging and TPing the homes of politicians. Advocating and supporting rape is not something we should have to tolerate, as it does support and condone violence.
 

Thanda

Well-Known Member
I don't support the death penalty for rape, but rape is rape. There are different circumstances, but they are all rape. Sentencing shouldn't be based on the victim's psychological strength and ability to recover, or how badly injured they are, but solely on the fact that the attacker committed a rape. I don't agree with the death penalty, but I do support chemical castration (or physical, if the offender chooses).

Do you also support chopping or incapacitation of hands for stealing or assault, the chopping or incapacitation of feet for assault and the chopping off of the tongue for lying, bigotry and hate speech?

If not, why do you think rape is special?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It would be a very different story if it was aimed at government officials. There would be consequences if a group tried to legalize egging and TPing the homes of politicians.
No, that would be legal too.
To advocate the legalization of something horrible is very
different from advocating the commission of a crime.
 

9Westy9

Sceptic, Libertarian, Egalitarian
Premium Member
I don't support the death penalty for rape, but rape is rape. There are different circumstances, but they are all rape. Sentencing shouldn't be based on the victim's psychological strength and ability to recover, or how badly injured they are, but solely on the fact that the attacker committed a rape. I don't agree with the death penalty, but I do support chemical castration (or physical, if the offender chooses).

So you would support castration of people found guilty of rape, even though some of them will be wrongly convicted?
 

Thanda

Well-Known Member
Because rape is violent and frequently traumatic. A thief tends to not psychologically harm their victims. Unlike theft, rape can never be a desperate act of survival. It can never be done in self-defense, and it's far more than slugging someone because they provoked and taunted you.

Aside from the fact that it can be a desperate act of survival (there have been such cases in my country) we'll leave that for now.

What's important is that those are not the only conditions under which people steal. And I was assaulted without ever having had a conversation with the perpetrator.

And as I have said before, rape is not always violent. Many rapes happen while people are unconscious.

So you are still left justifying why you have a one size fits all punishment for something that is not always the same. You seem to have no problem categorizing assaults, thefts, lies and bigotry.

So the question remains, why do you think rape is special?
 

9Westy9

Sceptic, Libertarian, Egalitarian
Premium Member
Not before a careful review of the case. If there is reasonable doubt, no, and false-reports are rare to begin with.

There will still be the inevitable few that will slip through the net. Also what do you mean by rare? 5%? Less? More?
 

Akivah

Well-Known Member
Not before a careful review of the case. If there is reasonable doubt, no, and false-reports are rare to begin with.

Not THAT rare.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape

It is extremely difficult to assess the prevalence of false accusations. Not all jurisdictions have a distinct classification of false accusation, resulting in these cases being combined with other types of cases (e.g. where the accuser did not physically resist the suspect or sustain injuries) under headings such as "unfounded" or "unproved". There are many reasons other than falsity that can result in a rape case being closed as unfounded or unproven. DiCanio (1993) states that while researchers and prosecutors do not agree on the exact percentage of false allegations, they generally agree on a range of 2% to 10%.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Aside from the fact that it can be a desperate act of survival (there have been such cases in my country) we'll leave that for now.

What's important is that those are not the only conditions under which people steal. And I was assaulted without ever having had a conversation with the perpetrator.

And as I have said before, rape is not always violent. Many rapes happen while people are unconscious.

So you are still left justifying why you have a one size fits all punishment for something that is not always the same. You seem to have no problem categorizing assaults, thefts, lies and bigotry.

So the question remains, why do you think rape is special?
I would say rape is violent, by definition. (Whether the victim is conscious or not.)
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
By what definition?
By the definition of the word "rape."

RAPE:
1: an act or instance of robbing or despoiling or carrying away a person by force
2: unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against the will usually of a female or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent — compare sexual assault, statutory rape
3: an outrageous violation
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rape

rape:
noun
1.
unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of thevagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by asex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent ofthe victim.
2.statutory rape.
3.an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation:
the rape of the countryside.
4.Archaic. the act of seizing and carrying off by force.
verb (used with object), raped, raping.
5.to commit the crime of rape on (a person).
6.to plunder (a place); despoil:
The logging operation raped a wide tract of forest without regard forthe environmental impact of their harvesting practices.
7.to seize, take, or carry off by force.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rape



That is, what about the definition of rape makes it inherently violent?
What is not violent about rape?
 

Thanda

Well-Known Member
What is not violent about rape?

You have provided a whole lot of definitions (some of which are irrelevant I might add) but none of them have shown that rape is inherently violent. Taking something that belongs to someone without consent does not in and of itself prove violence. Theft is an example of taking something without violence.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
You have provided a whole lot of definitions (some of which are irrelevant I might add) but none of them have shown that rape is inherently violent. Taking something that belongs to someone without consent does not in and of itself prove violence. Theft is an example of taking something without violence.
Statutory rape is often voluntary sex.
Imagine putting an 18 year old kid to death for that.....incredibly evil, eh?
 
Top