I don't find this to be all that relevant to the discussion.
COVID is everywhere.
We live in a global community where we're all connected.
I must have weirdly replied to someone else.
From these threads people repeat facts-numbers, efficiency of vaccines, pictures, and so forth. I don't know what they are supposed to do in and of itself.
You can disregard.
Yes, every single one.
There are only about four of them, thankfully.
From conversing with them.
How does the uninformed you have spoken to reflect the decisions and intentions of the unvaccinated all around the world?
Logically, how does being unvaccinated mean one is ignorant or misinformed?
We can have our opinions of what others "think" they mean or know but not all opinions are facts.
I didn't say that.
I said they are uninformed. I didn't say they're uninformed simply because they're unvaccinated. They're uninformed because they don't know how to vet their sources.
And those that do and are unvaccinated?
You're arguing against something I didn't say.
I don't understand this point of view at all.
Why aren't you concerned about a global pandemic that has killed over four million people?
When you vaccinate, you are helping those people overseas. And you're helping people in your own country. And you're helping people in your own region. And you're helping people in your direct vicinity. And you're helping members of your family whom I hope you do care about, at least.
Since so many people die all around the world I never put too much thought into people in an empathic way since in doing so-sharing in others suffering-it would get me sick.
How so? I'd only be helping those who are around me if I were vaccinated. People who aren't physically around me cannot catch COVID if I have it, so the idea of helping people from across the world would make sense to those who are always in contact with people to build that herd immunity. If I just stayed at home all day and night the helping people around the world would be, well, a nice goal but not something that applies to me (in this example).
This isn't my particular situation, but it's like telling someone who lives in solitude (say a loner in the woods) that without getting vaccinated he would put millions of people in danger. While the "idea" of potentially spreading a disease if one has it is problemsome but how does it apply to the minority who have a less chance of catching it if any?
I don't think anything "magically" changes peoples' minds.
I expect that peoples' minds will be changed by good evidence and reason and logic.
But your good evidence, reason, and logic isn't universal and people who read the same information (mind you, from all around the world) will come to different conclusions. Some get the vaccine out of fear... some are unvaccinated out of fear. Some don't research but just jump the gun and vaccinate... others don't research and decide not to vaccinate.
We just don't know how people came to their decisions but someone unvaccinated alone doesn't determine who based their decision on logic and who did not.
Knowledge beats ignorance every day of the week. A person arguing from a position of ignorance, is by definition, uninformed or ill-informed.
Both unvaccinated and vaccinated could be ignorant even with the facts... some out of fear and others maybe peer pressure or so have you. The victims fall on both sides. We just don't know every vaccinated person made a "smart" decision and we don't know every unvaccinated person made an "uninformed" decision.
I don't believe it is reasonable nor logical to say unvaccinated are uninformed. You'd have to make a direct connection between their decision to not vaccinated and how much they know.
I mean you can make a sound and rational decision that you feel conflicts the well-being of others without their needing to be uninformed (or ignorant or so have you), right?
Can people have the responsibility of making their own decisions without needing to justify it?
They may be, but they usually aren't.
How do you know?
There are unvaccinated people all over the world.