Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Complete nakedness would only indicate complete nakedness on an objective scale. Only on a subjective scale can you add values such as "complete nakedness = most shameful".
Different cultures certainly have different subjective scales over what constitues modesty vs immodesty. But even then, they aren't exactly hard-and-fast for every single person or every single community within that culture.
nakeness which all of us agree that nakeness(bold) is shameful
No, all of us do not agree with such an irrational, unsubstantiated assertion, as we've already demonstrated numerous times previously in this very thread. There is absolutely nothing sinful nor shameful about nudity and sexuality. Both are natural and beautiful. It's primitive, oppressive religions that brainwash us to think otherwise. If you're not going to bother reading the thread, then you really shouldn't bother posting in it, either.
Yes natural and most beautiful
I'm not sure beautiful is the word here lol, but it's definitely natural and in any case not shameful.
Yes sure,animal don't feel shame to do it in the open air.
Depends on the animal. Humans are animals, but for evolutionary reasons, evolved to quite often feel shame at public sex.
Yes natural and most beautiful
By "evolved" you mean "indoctrinated"?
No i guess for security reason during the stone era.
if a primitive man will saw 2 making love in the open-air,then he'll bring a huge stick and strike him on the back head
and he'll take his place and again if another man saw them,he'll do the same thing,so it wasn't because of abashment ,but because of fear,you know while doing it,concentration is down
...why?No i guess for security reason during the stone era.
if a primitive man will saw 2 making love in the open-air,then he'll bring a huge stick and strike him on the back head
So by your own admission, Islamic societies are on a stone age level, and must shroud the females in order to protect them from the males? Does that mean men in the west are more evolved since such precautions are unnecessary?
Sorry that because of my discipline character which prevent me to make an insult to the west as a community for replying an ignorant person.
My morals prevent me to be dragged to silly arguement
Did you enjoy the paintings?
Sorry that because of my discipline character which prevent me to make an insult to the west as a community for replying an ignorant person.
My morals prevent me to be dragged to silly arguement
FearGod, I can't figure out where you stand on this issue. You started the thread discussing how men in the west are fully clothed, yet women are not, then you went into your scale of decent clothing...rating from 0 to 10.
What exactly is the point here?
ssainhu,itsn't me the one to start this thread,please check.
i was just sharing my thoughts and opinions.
Your discipline? How is being obsessed with making rules for what women should and shouldn't be allowed to wear a measure of your discipline?