Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
They are best understood by comparing them with natural rights. The human right to life is conditional on the purposes and principles of the United Nations, but the natural right to like is only conditional on forfeiture, eg murder results in the forfeiture of the natural right to life (lex talionis).
Thank you. The UN doesn't control the term "human rights."
It doesn't control how the term is interpreted, but the facts remain. Since you have ignored the facts about the difference between natural rights and human rights I'm putting you on ignore.
Understood. The door for discussion will be open on this end if you ever decide you'd like to talk with me again.
Dr. Peter McCullough emerged during the COVID-19 panic as a champion of science and truth. Great respect for Dr. McCullough. Did you see his testimony at the senate Homeland Security hearing in Nov of 2020 about early outpatient treatment of COVID-19? If not, you should watch that. It's like 2.5 hours long if you watch the whole thing (very much worth your time).Medical Journal DISAPPEARS New Study Tying Covid Vaxx To Deaths
Become a Premium Member: https://www.jimmydore.com/premium-membership Go to a Live Show: https://www.jimmydore.com/tour Subscribe to Our Newsletter: https://mailchi.mp/jimmydorecomedy/ytlivestreams LIrumble.com
Really? Peter McCullough?Dr. Peter McCullough emerged during the COVID-19 panic as a champion of science and truth. Great respect for Dr. McCullough. Did you see his testimony at the senate Homeland Security hearing in Nov of 2020 about early outpatient treatment of COVID-19? If not, you should watch that. It's like 2.5 hours long if you watch the whole thing (very much worth your time).
The jaw-drop moment in the hearing began, starting at timestamp 2:14:45, when Dr. Fareed, who had experiential knowledge gained through treating patients with COVID-19, along with the two other doctors (McCullough, Risch) who were also actively treating COVID-19 patients, said about the government-employee doctor (Ashish)—who during the entire hearing had dismissed out of hand everything that the private-practice doctors were saying—that he (Dr. Fareed) wondered if Dr. Ashish actually saw patients, based on how Dr. Ashish had been speaking during the hearing.
When the time was given to Dr. Ashish, he went on at length about how he is a practicing physician, and how his patients want him to look at the evidence and provide science-based treatments, and how he wanted the private doctors to be respectful to him on account of his credentials, etc. Senator Johnson pins him down and asks him point-blank how many COVID-19 patients he'd treated.
The answer? None.
Not even one.
To this day, that represents the COVID-19 panic in a nutshell from a civil standpoint—common citizens coming into actual solutions through real science being shut down by bureaucrats with no practical or practice-based knowledge or experience of any kind; just academics…just theories.
Yes. Dr. Peter McCullough.
kirschsubstack.com
Where's his evidence?
www.frontiersin.org
I'll tell you at least one problem with his study, and it's this:Mark Skidmore wrote a paper that showed that 217,000 Americans were killed in 2021 by the COVID vaccine.
The journal retracted the article and Mark’s university commenced a 7-month investigation into unethical behavior by Professor Skidmore.
Today, I’m pleased to announce that Professor Skidmore has been exonerated on all charges and his paper, with some helpful additions suggested by Dr. Susan Oliver (and her dog, Cindy), has now been published in another peer-reviewed journal.
MSU Professor Mark Skidmore was exonerated by MSU; his landmark paper showing over 250,000 killed by the COVID vaccine is now back in the peer-reviewed literature
After a 7 month review by his university, Mark Skidmore, was exonerated of all charges and his new, improved paper was published in a more credible peer-reviewed journal.
No but by far the majority of the unvaccinated are Republicans and extreme independents that support Republicans,You don’t have to be a Republican to be unvaccinated.
I read the article and found an interesting subjective leap of the from the numbers of those that "could" have been killed to the numbers that "were" ;killed.Mark Skidmore wrote a paper that showed that 217,000 Americans were killed in 2021 by the COVID vaccine.
The journal retracted the article and Mark’s university commenced a 7-month investigation into unethical behavior by Professor Skidmore.
Today, I’m pleased to announce that Professor Skidmore has been exonerated on all charges and his paper, with some helpful additions suggested by Dr. Susan Oliver (and her dog, Cindy), has now been published in another peer-reviewed journal.
MSU Professor Mark Skidmore was exonerated by MSU; his landmark paper showing over 250,000 killed by the COVID vaccine is now back in the peer-reviewed literature
After a 7 month review by his university, Mark Skidmore, was exonerated of all charges and his new, improved paper was published in a more credible peer-reviewed journal.
Fair enough. Using the dose data from statista of 655 million and the death/dose rate of 0.1% from the NZ Ministry of Health data, Skidmore's estimate looks pretty conservative (I'm assuming that there's no difference in the mortality rate between the different manufacturers).
www.statista.com
More than people think!?!?!?!
Have you been following the thread and did you do any research on your own????
What isn't addressed is the possibility of non-uniform lots. There's evidence for this from the NZ data, where peak death/dose for a specific lot was around 24% while the mean death/dose was around 0.1%.Have you been following the thread and did you do any research on your own????
The pandemic inflicted higher rates of excess deaths on both Republicans and Democrats. But after COVID-19 vaccines arrived, Republican voters in Florida and Ohio died at a higher rate than their counterparts, according to a new study.
Researchers from Yale University who studied the pandemic's effects on those two states say that from the pandemic's start in March 2020 through December 2021, "excess mortality was significantly higher for Republican voters than Democratic voters after COVID-19 vaccines were available to all adults, but not before."
UNTANGLING DISINFORMATION
Pro-Trump counties continue to suffer far higher COVID death tolls
More specifically, the researchers say, their adjusted analysis found that "the excess death rate among Republican voters was 43% higher than the excess death rate among Democratic voters" after vaccine eligibility was opened.
The different rates "were concentrated in counties with lower vaccination rates, and primarily noted in voters residing in Ohio," according to the study that was published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine on Monday.
It's the latest research to suggest the perils of mixing partisan politics with medical advice and health policy.
You know those folks who had COVID but no symptoms? A new study offers a
n explanation
The study collected weekly death counts, breaking down the deceased's party ties along with their county and age cohort. It used May 1, 2021, as a key dividing line because the date marks a month after all U.S. adults became eligible to receive shots of the COVID-19 vaccines.
The researchers estimated excess mortality based on how the overall rate of deaths during the pandemic compared to what would have been expected from historical, pre-pandemic trends.
Researchers saw a divide suddenly emerge
As they calculated excess death rate data for Florida and Ohio, the researchers found only small differences between Republican and Democratic voters in the first year of the pandemic, with both groups suffering similarly sharp rises in excess deaths that winter.
FDA advisers back updated COVID shots for fall vaccinations
Things changed as the summer of 2021 approached. When coronavirus vaccine access widened, so did the excess death gap. In the researchers' adjusted analysis of the period after April 1, 2021, they calculated Democratic voters' excess death rate at 18.1, and Republicans' at 25.8 — a 7.7 percentage-point difference equating to a 43% gap.
After the gap was established in the summer of 2021, it widened further in the fall, according to the study's authors.
The study doesn't provide all the answers
The researchers note that their study has several limitations, including the chance that political party affiliation "is a proxy for other risk factors," such as income, health insurance status and chronic medical conditions, along with race and ethnicity.
New findings join other reviews of politics and the pandemic
In late 2021, an NPR analysis found that after May of that year — a timeframe that overlaps the vaccine availability cited in the new study — people in counties that voted strongly for Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election were "nearly three times as likely to die from COVID-19" as people in pro-Biden counties.
"An unvaccinated person is three times as likely to lean Republican as they are to lean Democrat," as Liz Hamel, vice president of public opinion and survey research at the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation, told NPR.
SHOTS - HEALTH NEWS
Pro-Trump counties now have far higher COVID death rates. Misinformation is to blame
Even before vaccines were widely accessible, researchers were working to quantify the effects of vastly divergent COVID-19 policies across U.S. states.
A widely cited study from early 2021 found that in the early months of the pandemic's official start date in March 2020, states with Republican governors saw lower COVID-19 case numbers and death rates than Democratic-led states. But the trend reversed around the middle of 2020, as Republican governors were less likely to institute controls such as stay-at-home orders and face mask requirements.
Sponsor Message
