Muhammads knowledge divine or learned?

[Britedream]

:no:

There is no god, scientifically he does not exist, because there has NEVER been anything to test that shows he exist.

I don't have to prove god exist, you do, and you have failed. :biglaugh:

No I did not fail, the fact we reasoned about it, and I show you that the logical conclusion of the universe being create by God, is obviouse, where it was nothing, then it became, your link that you gave me to disprove this conclusion failed to do so.
So what was your respond after you realized that, you said "this is all I have" or something along that line.

 

[outhouse]

Do you believe your book has no mythology?

 

[outhouse]

Response: You failed to answer the Qur'an challenge, thus your own failure supports the fact that the Qur'an is the true word of Allah.

False, here is a challenge.


Abraham factually has no historicity as ever existing as a real person.

Your book claims he is real.


Why does no credible historian, not a single one in the whole wide world, use your book to study Abrahams historicity????

 

[Al-Fatihah]

False, here is a challenge.


Abraham factually has no historicity as ever existing as a real person.

Your book claims he is real.


Why does no credible historian, not a single one in the whole wide world, use your book to study Abrahams historicity????

Response: False. The Qur'an challenge shows that the Qur'an cannot be created by any human, thus proving that it is divinely made from Allah.

If the Qur'an is false, then why can't you answer the challenge and prove it?

 

[outhouse]

The Qur'an challenge shows that the Qur'an cannot be created by any human,

No it does not

It is garbage.

Can you tell me why your warrior had to steal love from a 9 year old?

 

[outhouse]

Why does no credible historian, not a single one in the whole wide world, use your book to study Abrahams historicity????

 

[Britedream]

No it does not

It is garbage.

Can you tell me why your warrior had to steal love from a 9 year old?

You do not call the Quran garbage.:no:

 

[Al-Fatihah]

No it does not

It is garbage.

Can you tell me why your warrior had to steal love from a 9 year old?

Response: Yet your failure to answer the Qur'an challenge shows otherwise. As for the rest, you can refer to this thread:

Muhammad (saw) and His Marriage with Aisha (Ra).

 

[outhouse]

You do not call the Quran garbage.

I called the challenge garbage.

But it is my opinion only, that your book is not garbage. It is just factually not historical in many places. Maybe you should look up that word factual.

BUT how people read and follow it and murder over it, A false so called prophet who could only steal love from 9 year old, is garbage in my opinion.


Why does your religion harbor the most terrorist out of any religion?


When people think of violence, islam is also thought of.

 

[outhouse]

Muhammad (saw) and His Marriage with Aisha (Ra).

So you support pedophilia,

 

[outhouse]

Response: Yet your failure to answer the Qur'an challenge shows otherwise. As for the rest, you can refer to this thread:
.

So what ever divine aspect talked to your prophet was in error AH OK

 

[Britedream]

I called the challenge garbage.

But it is my opinion only, that your book is not garbage. It is just factually not historical in many places. Maybe you should look up that word factual.

BUT how people read and follow it and murder over it, A false so called prophet who could only steal love from 9 year old, is garbage in my opinion.


Why does your religion harbor the most terrorist out of any religion?


When people think of violence, islam is also thought of.

If there is a challenge, go ahead and meet it, then when you win, you have the right to say what you have said. otherwise, this kind of lies will not help, I already gave a link to disprove these lies, but you have a short memory.

 

[Al-Fatihah]

So you support pedophilia,

Response: Your weak rebuttal says otherwise.

 

[outhouse]

If there is a challenge, go ahead and meet it, then when you win, you have the right to say what you have said. otherwise, this kind of lies will not help, I already gave a link to disprove these lies, but you have a short memory.

apologetics do not dictate historical reality.

YOU do not dictate history.


You are biased, and refuse credible knowledge

 

[outhouse]

then the individual can take up the challenge to find a discrepancy in the Qur’an and when the person discovers that there is no discrepancy,

Your challenge is a LIE.

I have found a factual discrepancy. Your challenge factually has no validity.


Your book claims abraham as a real person.

But Abraham factually does not have any historicity as existing.

Abraham - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

By the beginning of the 21st century, and despite sporadic attempts by more conservative scholars such as Kenneth Kitchen to save the patriarchal narratives as history, archaeologists had "given up hope of recovering any context that would make Abraham, Isaac or Jacob credible 'historical figures'".

This means Abraham factually has no historicity as ever existing in reality.

 

[Britedream]

apologetics do not dictate historical reality.

YOU do not dictate history.


You are biased, and refuse credible knowledge

My religion is not a history, wakeup.

You took a biased person view, that I showed he is admitting, and I told you to keep that in mined. So you are the last person to talk about bias.

 

[outhouse]

My religion is not a history, wakeup.

.

OK so it is ALL mythology and none of it is historical, finally we agree. :clap


You need to possess the intellect to understand your book makes historical claims.

 

[Britedream]

OK so it is ALL mythology and none of it is historical, finally we agree. :clap


You need to possess the intellect to understand your book makes historical claims.

No I do not agree. you do not put words in my mouth. the myth is the way you think.
I mean no offense, but if what you have is called intellectual, I do not need it.

 

[Al-Fatihah]

Your challenge is a LIE.

I have found a factual discrepancy. Your challenge factually has no validity.


Your book claims abraham as a real person.

But Abraham factually does not have any historicity as existing.

Abraham - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

By the beginning of the 21st century, and despite sporadic attempts by more conservative scholars such as Kenneth Kitchen to save the patriarchal narratives as history, archaeologists had "given up hope of recovering any context that would make Abraham, Isaac or Jacob credible 'historical figures'".

This means Abraham factually has no historicity as ever existing in reality.

Response: Saying Abraham did not exist requires proof. You have none, thus refuting yourself and confirming the Qur'an is true.

 

[outhouse]

Response: Saying Abraham did not exist requires proof. You have none, thus refuting yourself and confirming the Qur'an is true.

No

You need to prove Abraham has historicity, because your book makes that claim.


I have proved he factually does not have historicity.

that would make Abraham, Isaac or Jacob credible 'historical figures'".

This means they are not historical figures. And this is credible.