Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
...and one of Islam's greatest role model's, Khadijah, was one of Makkah's wealthiest business women. The wife of the Prophet was no slave to him. He did quite a bit of housework too. Go figure...
so he obviously didnt think it was a form of evil if his wife worked outside the home or if he did some of the housework
yet the quote given by Godbearer from the Quran stated that it is an 'evil for a man to do the work in the home' (along those lines)
i'll go back and try and find the quote
The guidance of the Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam) toward his wives is the best example. Imam Al-Bukhari reported that al Aswad said:" I asked Aisha what the Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam) used to do in his house? She replied:" He used to serve his wives, and when the time for prayer came he used to go out for the prayer."
Imam Ahmed reported that Aisha said:" I was asked about what the prophet used to do in his house? I replied:" He was an ordinary man, he used to sew his garment, milk his goat, and serve himself"
You have no other claim upon them, Cooking is not the duty of a wife
From this Tradition the Jurists have deduced a ruling of delicate nature and which makes men annoyed. The ruling lays down that according to the Shari'ah it is not the responsibility of a woman to cook food for the household. For this purpose the Jurists have divided women into two classes. Women of one class are those who do household work, including cooking food in their parents houses. The other class consists of women who do not cook food in their fathers house where cooks are employed for this work. If after marriage a woman of the latter class goes to her husbands house she is not at all responsible to cook food, religiously, legally, morally or otherwise. On the other hand, that wife may ask her husband to hire a cook for her as man is obliged to provide her with food along with other necessaries of life.
pegg said:what if the husband gets sick or injured and cannot work? How will he provide for his family if only he can be the breadwinner???
This is a major flaw of the Quran in my opinion. When very tight rules are imposed such as 'the wife is the house servant and man is the worker outside the house', then it can make life very difficult if your circumstances change.
If the man cannot work due to illness, then surely a wife should be able to do so to support her family...if she cannot because the religion has established a rule that she must only work at home, then the family will starve. Where is the wisdom in that?
You're right about that.
In the real world, nothing is ever so black-and-white. Trying to follow strict interpretation or guideline of the Qur'an (or any other scriptures for that matter), can have negative impact or disastrous consequence on the individual or group of people.
And marriage or other relationship is no different.
I wonder what is ******** ,In other words, you still refuse to read my posts appropriately or are simply unable to make it past a few sentences (due to lack of care or whatever). Okay then, when you're ready to be serious let me know. Until then please have the courtesy to spare me your ******** advice and stop misrepresenting my position.
brother Debater Slayer , I guess you are the only one who understand my point here ,Brother, I realize that you are frustrated, but I think we should be calmer than this.
I'm not trying to sound like I'm patronizing you or anything, just that I hope we can keep this within the acceptable realm.
Argue with what is best.
it's honor to me that this is your opinion in me ,To those who are getting frustrated, just keep in mind that people who would assume Godobeyer's interpretation of Islam applies to all Muslims probably aren't worth the time anyway if they can't figure out that Godobeyer's interpretation is vastly outnumbered even by fellow Muslims here.
I get the frustration though. There are a lot of atheists that say facepalm-worthy things that frustrate me, too.
Plus, I think Godobeyer's a fundamentally good guy -- perhaps just with a misguided idea of relationships.
accuatly it's the second time i found my self ,copy/paste from that siteI've interpreted that as a language barrier issue. Godobeyer has quoted sites without realizing the sites were satirical, for instance. I don't think he's doing it on purpose
I wonder what is ******** ,
honestly if i instead of you i will be sorry that my post was against what Allah said in Quran.استغفر الله
you don't tell me you are against the slave of the wife , you tell me you are against the submission .
I read your claims it's just an opinion (had no reference ), and almost ambiguous to me (not clear) , mine it's an opinion , it's Quran verse and hadiths .
if i choice to follow ,if i should follow your opinion or Quran and Hadiths ?
of course i will follow what God and Muhammad said .
but if it's just misudernstand we each other , that's other problem , because I am talking with Debater and he told me that he with submission but in condition that He did not slave her . and I am compeletly agree with him.
submission in Islam never mean slavery , submission it's just kind of respect to husband .
Dont worry, it has happened to everyone in one way or another. Managed to find this site once where thay had these extremely fanatic opinions. Basically anyone who didnt agree with them where sent to hell, and they even said they would stand by laughing at the ones who burned. Other things I remember was one who tried to sell his daughter, another one who claimed God could sometimes allow people to rape children (in a positive light, like it was a reward), and so on. Then I found out the entire site was a satire, and everything was just a parody on Christian fanatics, lol!!!accuatly it's the second time i found my self ,copy/paste from that site
next time i take more attention .
any way i ask god to forgive him , it's he mean it .I also greatly consider this notion of what exactly qualifies as ********.
ok , to slavery a muslim in islam is something detestable in Islam ,Can you clarify this particular sentiment for an ignorant non-Muslim?
my claims (opinion) is based on Quran and Suna (hadiths ) which are my resouces . (not a personel opinion )What claim can any of us make that is not an opinion?
The only exception would be what we all unanimously agree upon based on evidence that cannot adequately be refuted.
it's something should be experienced to know/taste it .I do not understand this conception of submission as synonymous with respect. My significant other tends to fully respect me as myself just as much as I respect her as herself. We submit to one another in equal measure both ways. I do not understand how balance can be established in relationship with one partner to another without an equal measure of dominance and submission.
godobeyer said:ok , to slavery a muslim in islam is something detestable in Islam ,
the husband should not "use that verse of Quran or Hadiths " to slavery his wife .
God ask her to submit to her husband as kind of respect not to be slave to him .
there is no but IF we follow it, We should follow it , why ?But if you follow to the letter of the Qur'an 4:34, she is basically a property to punish if she disobey. You, yourself gave an example that could punish her if she went out without your permission. If a wife can be beaten (hard or soft, it doesn't matter) for disobedience, then how is that different to slavery?