@InvestigateTruth
“Firstly, Allah does not say such things that Previous scriptures Text are illegitimate. On the contrary He confirms them in Quran.”
He confirms the message sent initially but is also clear about the corruption that comes afterward and history proves it. Do you think that the Quran is needed for one to come to this conclusion? Do you think the ex-Christian became an Atheist because they heard what the Quran says or because they logically read the Bible and saw it to be false? I’ll go for the latter. You insisting on the former is basically you denying the reality of the situation.
“Secondly, the reason Quran was revealed is not because the Text of Bible are legitimate, but as Quran says, there was a corruption in interpreting the Bible.”
For starters, the Bible is not mentioned once in the Quran.
Secondly, you are neglecting the fact that the scriptures weren’t in the possession of the public like it is today. Christians that needed to learn stuff, they’d go to church and learn from the priest. The corruption is evident and it doesn’t have to come in textual format, although there is a mention of it in the Quran. (2:78)
“Thirdly, it is an incorrect belief to think Allah had not completed Religion when He sent Moses, or Jesus. It is irrational to think Allah would leave His work incomplete.”
I never made such a claim, nor did the Quran, nor does the Prophet in any hadith. You have been misinformed. The message was for particular people. Jesus for example says it himself that he was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel. (Matthew 15:24) Christian scholars have attested that the earliest manuscripts of Mark 16 end with verse 8. This means that 9 onwards was a later addition. You really need to read up more on these things.
Can you reference the hadith you stated please for the Tafseer of surat al asr? I can’t seem to find it on sunnah.com
“the 1000 years, was period that Allah gathers Ummah of Muhammad, just as He gathered Jews, when He sent Jesus.”
For starters there were about 1600 years between Moses and Jesus, so your number of 1000 years is clearly just speculation.
“You seem to think that, when your scholars graded Hadithes, they did a correct and perfect job! How do you know that?”
They set up a fair system that is more strict than what contemporary historians follow. If there is something wrong with the methodology, please state it with your contention and we can discuss it.
“He has said whatever Hadith Quran agrees with it is a True Hadith, and whatever is not in agreement with the Quran, it is a false Hadith.”
Where does it say that in the Quran?
“David”
You have changed your position. You initially started talking about the 12 during the time of Moses. And we even talked about those ayahs with the springs. I am not denying that David wasn’t a leader. I’m specifically talking about the time of Moses.
“So, again, the question is, why do you think, in Islam there are no such Khalifs, like David? Even though several Hadithes are confirming there will be 12 Khalifs after Muhammad, yet, you think you are right”
There used to be Caliphs until the state was dismantled. And we’ve had much more than 12 since the time of the Prophet. Sometimes 4 at a time. Each claiming their own right to be there. The Prophet told us quite clearly, “We do not assign authority of ruling to those who ask for it, nor to those keen to have it.” (Bukhari 93::13)
I wonder how many of those previous Caliphs wanted it.
“But if you don't bring verses and hadithes, why do you think you are representing Islam correctly?”
What are you talking about? I’ve been referencing as much as possible. Just check our conversation. If there was something I missed, please state it and I'll reference it
