• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

My first post

Audie

Veteran Member
@Audie
You don't believe in metaphysical truths? You don't believe we can come to rational and sound conclusions through thoughts and experience?

Thats not even a good try at changing the
subject.
" Metaphysics" is worse than helpless at
discerning any of the reality about such things
as the nature of atoms or, as mentioned, the
distance to the moon.

Pretense at being able, via word games
orv" revelation" to determine such as the
fundamental nature of the universe is somewhere in the range of pathetic and contemptible.
 

Come2thelight

Active Member
@Audie There were no word games here, it was a sincere question and there's no reason why you are neglecting to answer.

Do you think there is a source to existence?
 

Audie

Veteran Member
@Audie There were no word games here, it was a sincere question and there's no reason why you are neglecting to answer.

Do you think there is a source to existence?

How many times did you refuse to
answer, so far.
Kalam cosmo, by any other name, o
Is a word game.

Your "question" as asked, is meaningless.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
@sayak83

Hello and sorry for the late reply. Been busy

How does this god in a picture communicate? And what has it said? I need to know these things. The more information I get the better. So I can be fair with my assessment. So please provide sufficient information.

“You did not answer my question…”

My apologies, what question was that?
The question is this.
Suppose a person understands the Quran well, but rejects it and accepts this other religion (with worship of idols) as true and that religions God as true while the Muslim God as man made. Will his belief send that person to hell?
Maybe you can assume that this religion is polytheistic and God he worships is the king of these polytheistic pantheon. You can also assume that the religion does not tell any of it's worshippers to harm or hurt other people and the commandments are generally good. Though maybe quite different from Islamic praxis ( for example say pork and alcohol are considered divine offerings and partaking them in limited quantities during worship ritual is considered a way to show devotion. Or say fasting is considered a sin as giving unnecessary pain to the body is considered an offense to the Gods who created them as abode of the soul. Etc.)
 

Come2thelight

Active Member
How many times did you refuse to
answer, so far.
Kalam cosmo, by any other name, o
Is a word game.

Your "question" as asked, is meaningless.

Just because someone coined it with this name, doesn't mean the argument loses its validity. Can you please tackle where the argument fails?
 

Come2thelight

Active Member
Suppose a person understands the Quran well, but rejects it and accepts this other religion (with worship of idols) as true and that religions God as true while the Muslim God as man made. Will his belief send that person to hell?

I can never say who can go to hell and who won't. I told you this before. And as I said, I need more information about this picture god you are referring to, so that we can see what it has to say.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I can never say who can go to hell and who won't. I told you this before. And as I said, I need more information about this picture god you are referring to, so that we can see what it has to say.
I do not want to know what you say, but what Islam says.
What other info do you need?
 

ppp

Well-Known Member
Materially present. Which could be the same as yours no?
Maybe. No. Material is a tricky word. It refers to the matter and energy of our universe as well as fields, forces, and space-time. Again of our universe. That is not necessarily the totality of existence. Anything that has locality and duration in some other framework would also exist.

I will point out again, that whatever would, in your hypothetical, be the cause of existence, would necessarily have to exist. Which sets up an insoluble logical contraction.

Only things that exist can be the cause of other things.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
@England my lionheart

“In your opinion fair enough but the characteristics of this "one source of existence" seems local to the middle east.”

How do the characteristics seem local to the middle east?

There have been many prophets or messengers but only in the Middle East,none here or europe or Scandinavia Russia etc,considering “we have sent a messenger to all nations”.
 

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
I am not manifest to everyone, being veiled by My divine Yogmaya energy. Hence, those without knowledge do not know that I am without birth and changeless. Bhagavad Gita 7:25

How is this not the Creator?
The Creator or Creators are just Creators. If a God didn’t create anything, They are not Creators but still Gods.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Just because someone coined it with this name, doesn't mean the argument loses its validity. Can you please tackle where the argument fails?

Even tho i specially said. " by other name"
you try for a point with " just because"
as if i had implied such.
Shoddy and dishonest.

At least you finally admitted that " kalam cosmo" is your word game. It was like pulling teeth.

As if words and " metaphysics" could ever
even, AS NOTED. even determine the nature of
the moon. The koran has some amusingly quaint and childish notions about sushi things,
a terrif endorsement of revelations for. " truth ".

If you cant figure out the core prob with
" kalam", well that figures.

Ideologies tend to close minds to anything outside of confirmation.
 
Top