Let me get this straight: are you saying that God is incapable of creating that something people could see and that would convince them of God's existence?Yeah
But since he is immaterial human can see him by their hearts not eyes
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Let me get this straight: are you saying that God is incapable of creating that something people could see and that would convince them of God's existence?Yeah
But since he is immaterial human can see him by their hearts not eyes
Noone can see him by eyesHonest question: since God obviously chooses not to reveal himself to so many of us, how do you (or anyone else) know better than God?
So... nothing we can see is evidence of God? Do I understand you correctly?Noone can see him by eyes
As I told in this topic god has created a cover between us and himself just to test people.Let me get this straight: are you saying that God is incapable of creating that something people could see and that would convince them of God's existence?
NopeSo... nothing we can see is evidence of God? Do I understand you correctly?
It is just that I fail to see why people would be so bothered by such a simple, harmless thing as the existence of unbelievers.Noone can see him by eyes
Some gnostics can see him by hearts
Actually I didn't get your mean
Even our gnostics can do somethings after their death let alone prophetsYes, in the past, when I was religious. But I do not remember having supplicated Allah.
I think I remember I supplicated Jesus.
Do you think He could have helped as well? Was that a sensible thing to do?
Ciao
- viole
He doesn't trueIt is just that I fail to see why people would be so bothered by such a simple, harmless thing as the existence of unbelievers.
Even taking for granted that Ibrahim's God is real, it must then follow that God does not particularly need us to believe in his existence.
That is good enough for God, presumably. But somehow many Christians, Muslims and even Bahai insist that we need to believe... but why?
Hi
العنكبوت
فَإِذَا رَكِبُوا فِي الْفُلْكِ دَعَوُا اللَّهَ مُخْلِصِينَ لَهُ الدِّينَ فَلَمَّا نَجَّاهُمْ إِلَى الْبَرِّ إِذَا هُمْ يُشْرِكُونَ
And when they board a ship, they supplicate Allah, sincere to Him in religion. But when He delivers them to the land, at once they associate others with Him (65)
Have u ever had this experience in your life? Both positive and negative answers are appreciated.
Note: ship here means dire situation
Thanks in advance
So then disbelief is understandable?As I told in this topic god has created a cover between us and himself just to test people.
So then disbelief is unreasonable?Nope
Everything that u can see is a masterpiece of his power as u see a car and think about its designer
Even our gnostics can do somethings after their death let alone prophets
U know after passing some levels of mysticism for a gnostic being death or alive has no different. Because he is connected to god and has become a friend of god so he is alive for ever
But ordinary people are involved with their bad morals and deeds
He doesn't true
But it doesn't mean we don't need
Actually u forgot the purpose of creation that is to know god to become a manifest of his attributes as gnostics say according to your capacity.
Many people believe so. I can't say I understand why. It is such an arbitrary, questionable belief with no clear benefit.As I said before there is a battle between passions and reason
And god is a reward to those who obey their reasons
I mean he has shown us his way. We choose. But angels and animals have no this choice . That's why they have no hell and heaven but we have.So then disbelief is understandable?
So then disbelief is unreasonable?
Which is it? You seem to be contradicting yourself.
One of the most interesting subjects in philosophy is فقر وجودیSometimes one's level of desperation will surpass their level of reason, but that doesn't score a point for theism.
I don't know what u are looking for but first I started this topic I didn't want to involve logic.I am not sure how that is relevant. You seem to attribute moral importance to the belief in a god, not on the actual existence of that god. All those arguments seem to rely on that premise. And they rely on that premise because they single out atheists, and do not include, say, believers in Apollo or other gods very different from Allah.
So, let's check it out. Was it a sensible thing for me to supplicate Jesus? Was it sensible for all those people who believed in a god different from Allah, to supplicate them?
Ciao
- viole
I don't know what are u looking for but first I started this topic I didn't want to involve logic.
But for your question for those who believe in God or god's and the situation is so tough that no one can help u isn't sensible to make a supplication????? Is it good to sit down and watch your death????
There is a proverb in Arabic
The person that is in swamp does whatever even he grabs a stem to save himself
“People say there are no atheists in foxholes. A lot of people think this is a good argument against atheism. Personally, I think it's a much better argument against foxholes.”There is something similar in English: there are no atheists in foxholes.
Although it isn't in my Oxford dictionaryThere is something similar in English: there are no atheists in foxholes.
Both the arabic and the english proverbs are inherently equivalent.
Ciao
- viole
No, you said he hid himself from humanity to "test" us.I mean he has shown us his way.