Trailblazer
Veteran Member
Thanks for the permission.No, others can use it too.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Thanks for the permission.No, others can use it too.
Fine, it is your religious belief. But if you cannot support it in any other way then do not expect others to value it at all. In other words it is an argument that can be refuted with a "So what?"It is just a religious belief. I give it more credence because it is MY religious belief.
Aborted fetuses do go directly to heaven, according to my beliefs, but that does not mean that they would have gone to hell if they were not aborted. I do not even believe in hell as a place we go to, I believe it is distance from God and heaven is nearness to God. The aborted fetus had an equal chance at heaven if it had lived.
I know that was not moving the goal posts, but I sometimes make mistakes when I have posts coming at me left and right.LOL! No, it is not. How is that moving the goalposts? Once again, it is not a magic phrase.
I am not saying that you cannot reason rationally, but people that cannot reason rationally almost never use logical fallacies correctly.
Do you think that discrimination against the poor is a good thing?Any woman is free to have an abortion if it is legal.
There is however a small fee involved.Thanks for the permission.
I don't expect that.Fine, it is your religious belief. But if you cannot support it in any other way then do not expect others to value it at all.
That's right.In other words it is an argument that can be refuted with a "So what?"
No.Do you think that discrimination against the poor is a good thing?
You are welcome. Of course there is a slight fee . . .Thanks for the permission.
This decision effectively discriminates against the poor. A middle class woman that lives in Texas and needs an abortion could easily fly to Washington or California and back. A poor woman will not be able to afford to do so and could be forced into finding a back alley abortionist. Not nearly as safe for her. Deaths will go up due to this law.
You asked if it would make it if left alone. Chances are no, it will not, because left alone most pregnancies naturally terminate.Again why does this matter? Just because some do not make it does not mean the ones that will should be terminated.
It was a growth of cells. It couldn't speak. It had absolutely nothing outside of the mother's womb. My friend already had a family amd many friends and a life. There is no problem or issue in terminating the pregnancy to save her life. There was no loss from it, but a great loss averted.The problem with this is that another life different than the mothers is involved that cannot speak for itself.
Inb4You are welcome. Of course there is a slight fee . . .
But obviously a lot do make it to personhood. I asked because you brought it up as some sort of argument for abortion.You asked if it would make it if left alone. Chances are no, it will not, because left alone most pregnancies naturally terminate.
I will say this a second time. I have no problem with an abortion to save a mothers life if that is the decision that is made by the mother.It was a growth of cells. It couldn't speak. It had absolutely nothing outside of the mother's womb. My friend already had a family amd many friends and a life. There is no problem or issue in terminating the pregnancy to save her life. There was no loss from it, but a great loss averted.
This is not good.This decision effectively discriminates against the poor. A middle class woman that lives in Texas and needs an abortion could easily fly to Washington or California and back. A poor woman will not be able to afford to do so and could be forced into finding a back alley abortionist. Not nearly as safe for her. Deaths will go up due to this law.
And what is wrong with an abortion due to hardship?But obviously a lot do make it to personhood. I asked because you brought it up as some sort of argument for abortion.
I will say this a second time. I have no problem with an abortion to save a mothers life if that is the decision that is made by the mother.
Oh poop!Inb4
It affects another human life. If they do not have the abortion there is a chance it will turn into a person. I don't think a hardship should trump a persons right to life.And what is wrong with an abortion due to hardship?
It affects another human life. If they do not have the abortion there is a chance it will turn into a person. I don't think a hardship should trump a persons right to life.
I consider that patently absurd as well as completely unjust.Why, why, why can we not ask this simple question: "why should a 12 year old girl who has been raped, why should this child be forced to become a mother? Why?"
Because that is one certain effect of the Mississippi law that SCOTUS plans to uphold by striking down Roe.
Religion, mostly.I consider that patently absurd as well as completely unjust.
What is wrong with this country anyway?