Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Oh, yea I said that too once. Then I learned how a lie can lead someone to commit murder, or how committing adultery can psychologically screw up your kid and ultimately cause them to commit murder, not will, but can. See my point? I'm not even going to get into intent. So unless your, in theory, God, and you can see the chain reactions sins produce, we cannot assume that sins are not equal.
You lying to your son that god hates gays eventually leads your son, like a seed, an evil seed, to develop depression, which down the road he commits murder as a result. Is god gonna judge his act of murder more than your lie? There's always more to meet the eye good sir. This doesn't mean we're not held accountable for our sinful acts, especially those that break human laws. So don't get the impression that I'm saying sinning, even when it's unknowingly a result of some other negative effect, is excusable, or that ur not held accountable.
And doing things the right way and being honest CAN also lead to murder.
That's a lot of "what ifs."
Why do you need to know whether one is Christian or not? Or homosexual or not?
There are some problems with your post. First of all, homosexuality isn't something that one "does" -- it's something one "is." Biblically, when humanity was created, God proclaimed humanity "very good" -- including the possibility of some being homosexual.
Second, "being Christian" has nothing to do with "denying the truth of scripture." Jesus didn't hold that up as a litmus test for his followers. In the early days of Xy, most people couldn't read, and most were unaware of what the scriptures said. I just don't think that's a proper way to judge "who is" and "who is not."
Third, it's simply not a lie to say that homosexuality is OK. The bible doesn't speak about homosexuality. What the bible does do is talk about homosexual acts. But even then, we know that commandments, purity codes, and punishments are neither arbitrary nor immutable -- even when written in the bible. Even Jesus weighed the veracity of scripture many times, and found some of it lacking for the purposes of the time. For our time, in which we know more about the human psyche, and know homosexuality to be a normal and healthy expression of sexuality, it's not a lie to say "homosexuality isn't a sin." We, like Jesus, say, "the scriptures say..., but we say..."
The Christian life is far more concerned about the poor, the outcast, the victim, the prisoner, than it is about "following rules" (especially arbitrary rules that serve to exclude, to judge, and to harm). When people deny that homosexuality is sinful, they refuse to pass judgment on others based upon sexual preferences, they affirm that all people are acceptable by virtue of who they are, and they open the door for the outcast to also be included at God's table. When we deny the sinfulness of homosexuality, we affirm that those who identify as such do deserve God's favor, and are in a position to receive God's grace.
We only deceive ourselves when when we imagine people to be in sin simply because of who they are, and that God does not visit them with God's grace.
Basically, the ancients had no concept of sexual orientation as we do. Their view of sexual behavior was tied up with gender roles and general social expectation. So the verses that seem to be talking about homosexuality need to be examined and placed into their cultural context. They don't mean what people have been told they mean.
says the false teacher
Oh, stop projecting.
I believe it is you who is projecting your own personal wishes on the doctrines of the Bible. And I honestly can't blame you. It's hard to bare the burden of un-repented sin.
You don't even know how to interpret the Bible or its cultural context, so you're in no position to act like you know anything about it. Plus, you seem to be a Calvinist who believes in the concept of "human depravity", which is a nonsense.
Well, I never much followed Calvinism. I know what it is for sure, but I just read the Bible, and amazingly, it speaks for itself.
No, it doesn't. It has to be interpreted. And you are a Calvinist, at least in many of your views. If you've never been officially Calvinist, it's probably because of the influence of the culture you were raised in, since America has a Protestant culture in most areas. As a Catholic, I know how strong and often unnoticed this influence is because I often have to check myself and see if I'm not just parroting what the Protestant culture says or if it is what the Church actually teaches.
Actually if a compound word is used, and the root words of that word is known, and given that the word's precise meaning is not absolutely understood, it makes most sense to take a literal approach, ie, men in bed together.
No one is born gay. There are no gay babies. Sexual preference is learned behavior. There is no biological malfunction. Homosexuality is a psychological dysfunction.
BULL!
No legitimate study shows such!
They show just the opposite!
*
Absolute bull!
We HAVE uses of it - and NONE are as homosexual!
*
I believe it is you who is projecting your own personal wishes on the doctrines of the Bible. And I honestly can't blame you. It's hard to bare the burden of un-repented sin.
Well, I never much followed Calvinism. I know what it is for sure, but I just read the Bible, and amazingly, it speaks for itself.
If there were actual studies proving the existence of gay babies, I'm sure you'll bring them forth.
Being Homosexual is not a sin, - nor does the Bible say it is.
Being a Sacred Prostitute is.
*
I've already listed many studies, which are ongoing.
You haven't got a single legitimate study - that says it isn't before birth, (only the crap of religions idiots.) -
*