Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
Its just Math. It just is.
Math is us quantifying our environments nothing more.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Its just Math. It just is.
Well, have you ever learned about Math? Its Math. You can't change it and can't disprove it. It doesn't need you to exist.Its just is is not proof.
Well, have you ever learned about Math? Its Math. You can't change it and can't disprove it. It doesn't need you to exist.
Not really. Its us discovering the concept of order, which exists totally without our assistance.Math is us quantifying our environments nothing more.
Not really. Its us discovering the concept of order, which exists totally without our assistance.
Haha! Good trick question.Please try to disprove anything I believe.
Nothing within RF rules is off limits.
Haha! Good trick question.
Carl Sagan.Whatever has a beginning will always have an end. I do not recall who said that and my wi-fi is sluggish so I will not look it up now.
The big bang ya doiBut you have not proven that the universe was created yet.
The big bang ya doi
Something that you believe can not, by definition, be disproven.Im sorry, It was not meant to be.
Can you please explain how it is?
Something that you believe can not, by definition, be disproven.
What are you trying to say Taylor? The Big Bang was the event of the creation of the universe. The universe is 13.6 billion years old. :IAnd how exactly does that suggest the universe was created?
What are you trying to say Taylor? The Big Bang was the event of the creation of the universe. The universe is 13.6 billion years old. :I
How would it disagree?Can you provide evidence that it is? Because String Theory would disagree with that.
How would it disagree?
Please try to disprove anything I believe is true.
Nothing within RF rules is off limits.
Ooooh thanks. I'll read it, then we'll see if i disagree.Here you go, but I warn you string theory is very deep and complicated.
http://www.superstringtheory.com/cosmo/cosmo41.html
We can scan people's brains during prayer or mediation and see the brain light up in areas, which some interpret as evidence that religious experience is brain induced. But of you scan the brain of someone your stabbing with a needle, the brain also lights up. This doesn't imply the pain is made up.
Pain itself is the best example to support using experience as evidence, and it's how half of the field of medicine works. Take me, for example, who has a lot of unidentified issues. My pain is real, but no cause has been found. Brain scans or physiological tests will show pain, despite nothing seeming wrong physically. In medicine, this is not immediately pushed off to being all in ones head, because experiences arise from somewhere. It's the same for religious experience. Again this isn't proof through,it comes down to an interpretation of evidence.