Please try to disprove anything I believe.

[1137]

I am aware, but this occurs during many forms of introspection, thus does not prove religions to be correct in the slightest.

Again religious experiences are a result of mixing many things that effect us psychologically not because of any divine intervention.

You seem to think that "Y does not prove X" equates to "Y proves X false."

 

[Taylor Seraphim]

You seem to think that "Y does not prove X" equates to "Y proves X false."

No I am saying X^1 or X^2 could be the source of Y.

Therefore Y does not prove X^1.

X^1 = God, X^2 = Psychology, Y= Behavior.

 

[Terese]

Here you go, but I warn you string theory is very deep and complicated.

http://www.superstringtheory.com/cosmo/cosmo41.html

Fascinating. But this doesn't prove that the universe did not have a beginning.

 

[Taylor Seraphim]

Fascinating. But this doesn't prove that the universe did not have a beginning.

This proves the fabric of the universe was intact before the big bang and in string theory that fabric has not been shown to be able to be created or destroyed.

 

[Terese]

This proves the fabric of the universe was intact before the big bang and in string theory that fabric has not been shown to be able to be created or destroyed.

And what is this 'fabric'? This is all very fascinating.

 

[psychoslice]

The universe needs a creator. The universe was created, so there must be a creator. Don't think of a universe popping into existence by some 'magic'. Do you believe in the big bang theory?

The cosmos is the creator, its all one, everything happens within this oneness, there is nothing outside controlling this oneness.

 

[Taylor Seraphim]

And what is this 'fabric'? This is all very fascinating.

And what is this 'fabric'? This is all very fascinating.

Its called strings and strings are basically energy that when woven together form space-time and different frequencies of vibrations among these strings determine what type of matter or energy it is.

 

[Taylor Seraphim]

The cosmos is the creator, its all one, everything happens within this oneness, there is nothing outside controlling this oneness.

I agree with all but the cosmos is the creator part.

 

[psychoslice]

I agree with all but the cosmos is the creator part.

That's interesting, could I ask you how do you think it was created ?.

 

[Taylor Seraphim]

That's interesting, could I ask you how do you think it was created ?.

I do not think it was created.

 

[Terese]

Its called strings and strings are basically energy that when woven together form space-time and different frequencies of vibrations among these strings determine what type of matter or energy it is.

This fabric constitutes the universe. You called it energy. Yes, energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Could you tell me more about these 'strings'?

 

[Taylor Seraphim]

This fabric constitutes the universe. You called it energy. Yes, energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Could you tell me more about these 'strings'?

Im honestly no the best person too.

But can we agree that the universe could be eternal with no creator?

 

[psychoslice]

I do not think it was created.

Yes I see, do you have any belief in the big bang theory, I have to say that I am on the fence with this one.

 

[EtuMalku]

I do not believe there is evidence for a personal god.

Define 'personal god' please

I believe the universe is made solely of energy.

I believe the universe is eternal.

Which universe are you referring to?

 

[Taylor Seraphim]

Yes I see, do you have any belief in the big bang theory, I have to say that I am on the fence with this one.

The big bang was an event that is explained by String Theory.

 

[Taylor Seraphim]

Define 'personal god' please

A deity that is not simply a non-personified part of nature.

 

[Taylor Seraphim]

Which universe are you referring to?

The universe.

Universe: all existing energy and space considered as a whole; the cosmos.

 

[Terese]

Im honestly no the best person too.

But can we agree that the universe could be eternal with no creator?

Nope. The drive of nature, why things move, why things change, why anything, is from Brahman. Reality requires Brahman for it's existence, for Brahman is existence itself.
What do you think of the concept of consciousness creating matter, instead of the other way round?

 

[Taylor Seraphim]

What do you think of the concept of consciousness creating matter, instead of the other way round?

I think it has no basis in objective truth and that it only makes sense if you already believe it.

 

[psychoslice]

The big bang was an event that is explained by String Theory.

So you believe that everything existed, and the big bang was more or less something that happened within that existence ?.