Get honest and aware with yourself,
Are you arguing that since we humans are conscious, this proves the brain is producing consciousness, because, where else could we look for an explanation?
Which is called circular reasoning. Meaning: you already assume your faith and belief with no evidence. That is being dishonest with your own self. If you're not aware of this and another is, would that make someone less aware and another more aware. Since you're honest and I'm dishonest in your mind, does that make you more consciously aware than me? Why would you call anyone an idiot or delusive if all levels of consciousness are the same?
Evasiveness and dishonesty: strong claim yet not saying how so. Strong attacks and assumptions without saying how so. Sounds like dishonesty with oneself, and spreading dishonesty of another.
If you're ignorant of the fact that many scientists, physicists, and quantum physicists, both old school and modern day, have and are exploring consciousness outside of the brain as well, that's your choice. Use your material I-pad and search yourself about the millions of studies of consciousness outside of the brain, and all of the scientists exploring this. It's being explored both inside and outside.
"Credible." What is credible? You determine yourself what's credible anyhow.
Trick of the lower mind, being evasive and avoiding themselves and attacking another as if they are, diversion of attention. Please clear up what was dishonest, and avoided. If you truly need me to show you evidence as to why and that it is occurring in reality that scientists are exploring that, I will. It's common sense this is occurring because consciousness cannot be localized in the brain. The most logical explanation is that is because it is nonlocal, meaning an infinite phenomenon.
Consciousness can operate beyond the brain, body, and the present, as hundreds of experiments and millions of testimonials affirm. Look up the experiments yourself. They really are occurring in reality.
You do know what the subject of this thread, don't you?
It is about whether evolution is probable or impossible, mathematically or biologically.
Bringing up a few famous physicists, particularly with quantum physics, really have no bearing on the topic.
And time and time again, we have asked you for sources to back up your claims, but you have sidestepped requests, because you don't have any sources, from any of the named physicists you've named. Naming names is not giving us any source, because you have quoted a single thing that he said or wrote that give us any indications that these physicists agree with you.
That's evasiveness.
Do you understand why we ask from you, for credible or reliable scientific sources?
To determine if you are telling us that's true. Either you are ignorant or you are lying.
Have you done any research in schools or colleges or universities?
One of them is providing our sources to show what we have learn, and that we are not plagiarising other people's works. So we included books or journals that we have read in bibliography, references, in the footnotes.
I have done some personal researches in religion, particularly with the creation myths in Judaeo-Christian religions, for one of my website, and I have listed what texts I have read, and cited my sources, whenever I directly quote any passages. If I am going to quote from the bible, I will supply the book title, chapter and verse(s) with the translator's books (eg KJV, NIV, NRSV, etc)
These are my sources.
You have provided no sources, and you have mentioned names of a few physicists, and yet can't quote any of their works that agree with your claims. So basically you have nothing, but baseless claims.
If you are going to say that Bohr, Einstein or Newton have said any similar to what you have been claiming then please provide sources.
Saying sources is everywhere and dropping names, is evasive and not at all honest. Any village idiots can do that.
You want me to view you as honest person, then by all mean show us your sources. Show me that any of these physicists talk extensively about the higher consciousness or about spirits.
