Gharib
I want Khilafah back
Esalam, now you're getting a bit annoying. :slap:
prove it ha ha.
no seriously prove it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Esalam, now you're getting a bit annoying. :slap:
I have a brain owned by me that back me up.i have a statement made from you that backs me up.
You just did .prove it ha ha.
no seriously prove it.
Wrong, that does not qualify to call it a disease. And considering how overpopulated the world is, I think we would need a few more homosexuals. Assuming they do not decide to have children, that is.
Uh no, homosexuality is not contagious.
Sure they can. They just have to have sex with someone of the other sex... well, did, now there are options to that to. Fact is, we are evolving in a direction where we might not even need males anymore!homosexuals can't have children. what makes you think they can?
You don´t have the authority to say we are not over populated either.and whose to say when the world is over or under populated? you have no such authority.
Prove it.homosexuality qualifies to be a desease as much as the pig flu. even more.
You assume too much. She didn´t. And we do not have to get rid of it, especially since you have yet to give a valid reason for why it should be classified as a disease.well atleast you agree that it is a disease.
now if there is a dissease in the body we get rid of it. same with homosexuality. if there is a disease in the the community we have to get rid of it.
What kind of disease are you talking about, by the way? It cannot be a biological one, because then it would not be a choice. And I am not sure it can be a mental illness as well, since it does not hurt their ability to function in their life.
Maybe that homosexuality is an abnormal side effect of a society without morals? I don't know I'm just point it out, "disease" doesn't have to be a medical condition.
What I stated was that homosexuality has been around for quite a long...long...long time and the human race is still going.
It depends on his context. Assuming that he is speaking from an Islamic viewpoint then the Qur'an bans homosexuality for a prevalent reason. During the time of the Prophet, Arabia was plunged in tribal warfare. Thousands of years ago the life expectancy of a person in ancient Arabia was around 50. Coupled with the fact that the Ummah was engaged in crippling wars against other tribes, there was a shortage of men, the warriors and "bread earners". If the remaining warriors, theoretically, engaged in homosexual behavior, then wouldn't the population flatten out and eventually regress. For the progress of the Ummah itself, then it was necessary the males of society continue to start families. For the future of society itself. Though my knowledge of the subject of homosexuality is very limited.
"Normal" people are irrelevant, their comfort is irrelevant, fact is they got only themselves to blame for their issues with comfort.this is the disease: homosexuality, being a homosexual, is a disease. it is a disease to the rest of us normal people.
there is no disease in the person who is a homosexual, a homosexual is a disease to us. does it make sense?
:slap:quite right. but i wouldn't expect them to figure it out.
I have a brain owned by me that back me up.
Sure they can. They just have to have sex with someone of the other sex... well, did, now there are options to that to. Fact is, we are evolving in a direction where we might not even need males anymore!
You don´t have the authority to say we are not over populated either.
Prove it.
You assume too much. She didn´t. And we do not have to get rid of it, especially since you have yet to give a valid reason for why it should be classified as a disease.
"Normal" people are irrelevant, their comfort is irrelevant, fact is they got only themselves to blame for their issues with comfort.
:slap:
I'm talking about the time the Prophet revealed the message of Isalm. During this time war had depleted the Ummah of many men such as in the Battle of Uhud where many Muslims were killed and the Prophet almost lost his life.when you say "ancient arabia" are you speaking about the first generation of muslims of our ummah? how there were more women than men due to the men dying at battle? or are you reffering to a different time, much earlier than the time of the prophet (saws)?
Nor does what you wrote count. It boils down to values here, not evidence.i see a statement, but doesn't say much. thats just your oppinion. it doesn't count as proof that what you say is true.
So? That is not a reason, even if it was a choice it would not make it immoral or wrong, and it does absolutely not mean they need our help.because it's a choice. but they think it isn't. thus they don't know and we need to help them.
this is the disease: homosexuality, being a homosexual, is a disease. it is a disease to the rest of us normal people.
there is no disease in the person who is a homosexual, a homosexual is a disease to us. does it make sense?