Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
Thank you for reiterating this fact.
No problem. I like to keep the facts straight.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Thank you for reiterating this fact.
Proving the existence of Allah (swt) to an atheist
by Dr. Zakir Naik
I have seen this video before: YouTube - How to prove Scientifically to an atheist -Existence of God
There are numerous responses: YouTube - Dawah to an atheist? "Dr." Zakir Naik gets powned!
about that, there aren't any contradictions in the quran. see if there were i wouldn't be a muslim. the quran states that it is perfect, has got no errors. but if there was an error or a contradiction then the quran would be wrong saying it is error free.
On a small scale that might have been a possibility, even though it would be unlikely, but on the scale we are talking about it is only irrational to assume the other side is just sticking with their idea because of pride.Response: For the same reasons why a person defends any other lie. They want to be right and refuse to acknowledge that their completely wrong. It's called ego. However, the reason behind wanting to be right will vary depending on the person.
Zakir Naik is an embarassment to humanity. If I were a muslim I'd beg him to shut his mouth, and stop dragging all of the gullible people out to his talks. He's to islam like jerry fallwell is to christianity.
I have seen this video before: YouTube - How to prove Scientifically to an atheist -Existence of God
There are numerous responses: YouTube - Dawah to an atheist? "Dr." Zakir Naik gets powned!
it is all drama happening there, those people are pretending to be atheist, everything is planned to show before the big audience.
May I direct you to the vortex thread? If you have any evidence that provides a contradiction you are welcome to indulge us.That is blatantly false.
I don't know, I haven't seen any Qur'an verses to indicate so...Your friend Esalam doesn't seem to agree. Is this the mainstream view?
Care to elaborate?Hehe, you didn't read that very well, did you.
I have already posted these verses. Do you want me to hold your hand and provide a synopsis of the whole thread as it is now, as well?We don't need evidence to the contrary, as there is no evidence to support it in the first place. You're the one making the claim, so you're the one who has to do the proving.
All my respects to you and your faith, but verses are not good sources of information on subjects like these.I have already posted these verses. Do you want me to hold your hand and provide a synopsis of the whole thread as it is now, as well?
I never said anyone in this thread is Gay. I just commented how the Gay community can rally together as effectively or to a greater degree then political organizations.I find it amusing that no one posting in this thread is probably gay. I know im not. Although i don't know for sure and i really don't care how other posters live their lives, its good to see people standing up for the common good of equality
But the subject of matter is if my faith ascribes animals as possessing something greater then inherent knowledge. Surely the Qur'an is necessary to understand the answer?All my respects to you and your faith, but verses are not good sources of information on subjects like these.
May I direct you to the vortex thread? If you have any evidence that provides a contradiction you are welcome to indulge us.
Not if you wish to prove that they actually have some sort of free will. To be honest is it would not surprise me if we have underestimated many animals. However, I just do not think religious verses can prove it. And I do not think, in lack of better ways to put it, that if they have free will would have it the same way as we do, and it would probably be different from specie to specie. Assuming they have free will.But the subject of matter is if my faith ascribes animals as possessing something greater then inherent knowledge. Surely the Qur'an is necessary to understand the answer?
I have not seen any argument that has convinved me so far, the religious ones are just even less likely to convince me .As for my views/assumptions/thoughts on homosexuality, I have yet to use the Qur'an as something to base facts off of. I know it won't convince you lot!
Well, we're arguing whether animals are said to have freewill in Islam no? This is a religious interpretation. The other pictures of homosexual animals or not is just evidence if animals have a choice in their sexual desires. You have been arguing over Fatihah over the second, I am wondering why it matters in religious context.Not if you wish to prove that they actually have some sort of free will. To be honest is it would not surprise me if we have underestimated many animals. However, I just do not think religious verses can prove it. And I do not think, in lack of better ways to put it, that if they have free will would have it the same way as we do, and it would probably be different from specie to specie. Assuming they have free will.
Likewise You have also given me the intellectual high ground by saying you are stoopidI have not seen any argument that has convinved me so far, the religious ones are just even less likely to convince me
Likewise You have also given me the intellectual high ground by saying you are stoopid
I'm pretty sure I've seen all these before. Here's a site that conveneniently refutes all of them at once. Discussion Forum: Contradictions in the Koran? ...http://www.carm.org/religious-movements/islam/contradictions-quranIndulge yourself here to start with: Contradictions in the Qur'an | Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry __________________
I edited my post explaining I may have misunderstood (have not slept well ). Ironically I also forgot to complete the edit for the same reason, so you probably missed it.Well, we're arguing whether animals are said to have freewill in Islam no? This is a religious interpretation. The other pictures of homosexual animals or not is just evidence if animals have a choice in their sexual desires. You have been arguing over Fatihah over the second, I am wondering why it matters in religious context.
All in good fun.You shouldn't be saying stuff like that Abibi....:tsk: