Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
It was not too difficult in this case. I have no such training and spotted that as well.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Put on your oven mitts folks, you are going to need them:
- Thread starter Subduction Zone
- Start date
It was not too difficult in this case. I have no such training and spotted that as well.
Audie
Veteran Member
Last edited:
Drew Henefer
Warrior
You have a penis, or do you have a vagina?
Drew Henefer
Warrior
I'm totally stalking you, your the smartest person on here. not irl thoughYa think?
Anyway, thanks for speaking up.
Drew Henefer
Warrior
Your the dangerous one.....
This century, too.
This world is anything but reliable! Truth is stranger than fiction.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Nope, though wrong and sloppy by today's standards there was no fraud. A claim that creationists constantly make but cannot support.
There were some things that he was right about. That is why some of his work survives.
I was stating that his embryonic drawings are still found in textbooks and touted as evidence for CD, even in this century. I said nothing about his fraud.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That is true because they are evidence for evolution, though today the drawings are used for historical purposes. The evidence is shown better through photographs.
How many rational and highly respected people have remarked -- candidly, I might add -- that they've seen and /or had experiences with ghosts? Too numerous to mention!
Now, how many reliable sources have claimed to see fairies? None.
It's not "of the same order". Lol.
Last edited:
And yet, authorities have removed them, from most textbooks.
Why? If they're such good evidence.
It won't quite get that far! -- Revelation 11:18(last part)
IMO, it's you who seems limited.
I'll never tire of looking at my beautiful wife!
And, as microevolution slowly changes all organisms, we'll never tire of finding new species.
Also technology will probably advance to the point of intra-galactic travel; then there will be even more to explore and discover!
It will all be completely safe, too, having our loving Father's protection!
There will be a lot to look forward to!
Last edited:
You may not believe this, but the view you expressed, is exactly what the Bible states! God told Adam (after his sin), "You will return to the ground."
"The dead know nothing."
Those who die "go down to silence." "Their thoughts do perish."
The only hope is for a future resurrection.
Last edited:
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
not very many. Not "Too numerous to mention". Why even bring this up?
Okay, you effectively "believe in fairies". The burden of proof is upon you for that belief.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Please pay attention, they have removed what he got wrong. They have not removed embryology. Scientists are quite often a mix of right and wrong. In basic science classes there is not enough time to go over all of the errors that scientists have made. There is only enough time to cover some of what they got right. Do you understand this concept?
ecco
Veteran Member
He is beyond creepy.
ecco
Veteran Member
One reason Creationists cannot accept evolution is because they cannot truly comprehend the concept of millions and billions of years.
One reason religious folk look forward to Eternity is because they cannot truly comprehend the concept of an infinite number of years. After a while there would just be repetition and repetition and repetition and repetition.
Imagine sitting through the 4th grade class over and over and over. Bart Simpson has. But 29 years is not even a speck on eternity.