• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Question for Theists

The Wizard

Active Member
I have a question for those of you who believe in a god or gods, and it is actually a very important question so please take some time to consider the implications before you answer.

If no God existed, would you still want to believe in one?


Excellent question.. You may want to look closely at the intrinsic meaning of the phrase, "believe in God." It's meaning is more to the tone of "believing a God or its presence INTO ones experience, reality or world." When someone "believes in" something they start believing its presence "into" their life and experience.

When a person believes "IN" certain things with enough concentration, focus and frequency the outer world will start reflecting those beliefs as a reality. .. dynamics of the subconscious also play a part of this connection process.

The one who "believes in ghosts" encounters them. The one who doesn't "believe them into" their world won't. The negative guy gets negative experiences. The guy that doesnt believe in luck has less luck, etc.

Now, lets look at some basic concepts of God, the gods and the divine. When taken as the creator of all that's good, the mysterious patterns of goodness, a protector of harm and evil... the creator of the universe and one's experience of it, etc. You will see the reason behind it. For, our beliefs affect our reality and are a part of reality.

Please do not attempt to argue that beliefs in God are not a part of reality (or imaginary) when one of the very reasons this thread exists is due to the beliefs in God. This aspect IS the objective reason for such beliefs in God or the gods in my opinion. There would be no reason to disconnect ourselves from more goodness that our universe can muster to us by not using the magic of belief itself.

I don't need evidence from others to see that my beliefs affect my world as a reality. For, most haven't even grasped the reason for belief in the first place... And, half of the planet could not use their ability to believe even if their life depended on it....They can't even concentrate on something for more than 8 seconds.

Belief is a basic part of reality through cause and effect dynamics. I would think that a better quetion would be, "Why would someone NOT believe in at least something to add more goodness to their Life and experiences.

The belief that a wise, loving and good creator created the universe in fact has a purpose based in reality. Other people have just twisted those truthes... IMO. Anyway, I thought I would share my 2 sense for your well thought question.
 

Hawkins

Well-Known Member
I have a question for those of you who believe in a god or gods, and it is actually a very important question so please take some time to consider the implications before you answer.

If no God existed, would you still want to believe in one?

If God exists, you do have a chance to prove it.

If God doesn't exist (though you believe you by your faith), you are hopeless in proving His non-existence.

As scientifically speaking, if you suspect something exists you may have a chance to prove it. If however you suspect something doesn't exist, you'll be hopeless. As it is no hope to prove something doesn't exist. Alternatively speaking, non-existence can never be proved/disproved, NEVER! :D
 

jarofthoughts

Empirical Curmudgeon
The existence of the universe is evidence that existence does exist. The theist says that ontology created cosmology whereas the atheist denies that ontological existence exist at all. That is the relationship

We assert that existence is evidence.

I just showed you this. God is the ontology that created the universe or else how did the universe get here?

Hitchens was in error! Existence was never a negative. His limited compasity to reason caused him to overlook this obvious observation.

Hitchens was not in error.
The ontological argument is faulty. Just because you can imagine something that doesn't make it true.

As for how the universe got here? Well, there are a number of ideas regarding that, many which does not require any form of deity, including the concept of multiverses. However, Carl Sagan put it best when he concluded that if you decide that there had to be something that always existed (which is a normal theist argument for god), then you might as well save a step and say that the universe always existed (in some shape or form). The question nonetheless arises that if you postulate a god, then where did that god come from? And if you decide that that is an unanswerable question, then you might as well save a step and decide that the question of where the universe came from is unanswerable.

So from a logical and scientific point of view the concept of god adds absolutely nothing of value.
 

jarofthoughts

Empirical Curmudgeon
Excellent question.. You may want to look closely at the intrinsic meaning of the phrase, "believe in God." It's meaning is more to the tone of "believing a God or its presence INTO ones experience, reality or world." When someone "believes in" something they start believing its presence "into" their life and experience.

When a person believes "IN" certain things with enough concentration, focus and frequency the outer world will start reflecting those beliefs as a reality. .. dynamics of the subconscious also play a part of this connection process.

The one who "believes in ghosts" encounters them. The one who doesn't "believe them into" their world won't. The negative guy gets negative experiences. The guy that doesnt believe in luck has less luck, etc.

Now, lets look at some basic concepts of God, the gods and the divine. When taken as the creator of all that's good, the mysterious patterns of goodness, a protector of harm and evil... the creator of the universe and one's experience of it, etc. You will see the reason behind it. For, our beliefs affect our reality and are a part of reality.

Please do not attempt to argue that beliefs in God are not a part of reality (or imaginary) when one of the very reasons this thread exists is due to the beliefs in God. This aspect IS the objective reason for such beliefs in God or the gods in my opinion. There would be no reason to disconnect ourselves from more goodness that our universe can muster to us by not using the magic of belief itself.

I don't need evidence from others to see that my beliefs affect my world as a reality. For, most haven't even grasped the reason for belief in the first place... And, half of the planet could not use their ability to believe even if their life depended on it....They can't even concentrate on something for more than 8 seconds.

Belief is a basic part of reality through cause and effect dynamics. I would think that a better quetion would be, "Why would someone NOT believe in at least something to add more goodness to their Life and experiences.

The belief that a wise, loving and good creator created the universe in fact has a purpose based in reality. Other people have just twisted those truthes... IMO. Anyway, I thought I would share my 2 sense for your well thought question.

Thank you.

You do realize that your argument puts god on exactly the same level as faeries, Santa and crystal healing?
 

jarofthoughts

Empirical Curmudgeon
If God exists, you do have a chance to prove it.

If God doesn't exist (though you believe you by your faith), you are hopeless in proving His non-existence.

As scientifically speaking, if you suspect something exists you may have a chance to prove it. If however you suspect something doesn't exist, you'll be hopeless. As it is no hope to prove something doesn't exist. Alternatively speaking, non-existence can never be proved/disproved, NEVER! :D

Do you believe in faeries then?
 

Zelar

New Member
Originally Posted by Terrywoodenpic
I am not an athiest, I do believe in God
However, There is no evidence that God either exists or does not exist.



Exactly. There is no evidence that an invisible, intangible, pink unicorn either exists or does not exist. Do you believe that this unicorn exists? What about all the other things like big foot, vampires, were wolfs, leprechauns for which there is not evidence to prove for certain that they do not exist. Why make exception for God?
 
Last edited:

Zelar

New Member
If God exists, you do have a chance to prove it.

If God doesn't exist (though you believe you by your faith), you are hopeless in proving His non-existence.

As scientifically speaking, if you suspect something exists you may have a chance to prove it. If however you suspect something doesn't exist, you'll be hopeless. As it is no hope to prove something doesn't exist. Alternatively speaking, non-existence can never be proved/disproved, NEVER! :D

You are somewhat right.
It is true that it can not be proven that there does not exist some supernatural being out there.
Although it can be proven that a particular understanding of this supernatural being is incorrect.

The most popular understanding of this supernatural being is that it is:
All Powerful, All Knowing, All Compassionate.

The argument "Problem of Evil" proves this God impossible.

Here is the prevalent argument against "Problem of Evil":


"We can not possibly fully understand God. It is possible that God, with
all his great wisdom and knowledge far beyond ours allows for horrid atrocities to occur from which the victims will somehow ultimately benefit and we would have a better world because of all of the suffering. From our narrow point of view, it may seem that all this suffering can not possibly ultimately benefit the total sum of the world, but it is very possible."

Here is how this counter argument completely fails:


"If God is allowing all this suffering of innocent people so that they will unknowingly ultimately benefit from it and we will have a better world... Surely, God with all his power, should be able to bring about this ultimate benefit and better world without the suffering, yet he chooses not to do so.

I think this proves that the typical idea of God - All Powerful+Knowing+Compassionate
can not exist because if self contradiction.

If your were to change the definition of the most popular idea of God to:
1) All Powerful
2) All Knowing
3) Is not concerned with our best interests
Then this being can not be disproved.
 
Last edited:

tarasan

Well-Known Member
I have a question for those of you who believe in a god or gods, and it is actually a very important question so please take some time to consider the implications before you answer.

If no God existed, would you still want to believe in one?

of course not why would i wanna do a think like that id just be deluding myself
 

jarofthoughts

Empirical Curmudgeon
of course not why would i wanna do a think like that id just be deluding myself

Sounds like a good base to start from.
So, assuming that you do believe that a god exists, what makes you think this is the case? I'm not asking for scientific evidence for god as we all know that doesn't exist, but rather what makes you personally think that there is a god.
 

tarasan

Well-Known Member
Sounds like a good base to start from.
So, assuming that you do believe that a god exists, what makes you think this is the case? I'm not asking for scientific evidence for god as we all know that doesn't exist, but rather what makes you personally think that there is a god.

experience (to an extent, i feel its a fact that i have been influenced by it, but im all to aware that feelings can be created to fill what you believe should be there, if you understand my meaning)

various arguements, (im not quite sure how many i should state here as if i mention them all and we argue them all, then our talk is going to get very cluttered and confusing, limiting the dialogue.

I find that thiesm is a rational thing to hold ( I feel that the christian religion is a rational view to hold, also it offers a better explanation than the athiest explanations.
 
Last edited:

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.

At the very least I see it as a possibility, although I do see potential in our pursuit of knowledge that we might get a lot further than what we currently have. While we have been doing science for more than a thousand years the really big advances has come in the last hundred or so, and I don't think we've seen the end of that by a long shot. And who knows, a hundred thousand years ahead what we might know and understand by then, provided of course, that there is still a human race left. ;)

Well, it goes without saying that there is a lot more reality out there than we know about now - and that it's within our human capacity to continue to learn more every single day for aeons. That's not my point though. My point is that as humans with five (some would say six) senses, and all the other limitations of humanity, there is reality out there which we are simply unable to grasp or comprehend. Ever.

No, I don't think so. But I know that the 'god helmet' works very well to replicate the kinds of experiences that many theists have described when they claim to feel the "presence" of god, and while neuropshychology is in its infancy we have made some headway in the understanding of what kinds of effects the mind can manufacture. And this definitely falls within that category.

Definitely? You simply do not know this and cannot know this definitely. No offense, but this is, simply your opinion.

I wonder how many theists have actually searched for alternative explanations to their experiences?

A lot more than you probably realize. You are making a classic mistake - assuming that theists are theists by default and that reasonable, intelligent, objective, inquisitive people with many life experiences under their belt have not carefully considered other possibilities and explanations...and found them lacking.

Perhaps. But if you'll allow me to play the role of the Devil's advocate for a moment, that doesn't make it true. ;)

Nor does your unbelief make it UNtrue.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
I have a smart dog. I mean, for a DOG, WhoDat's smart - but he's only a dog, and frankly can never fully grasp human reasoning.

A few weeks ago, I took his buddy Josie away. When I brought her back several days later, I can just hear their conversation:

WhoDat: "Wow, girl, you lookin' rough. What happened to you?"

Josie: "You know that place they take us where they drag us in by our slave collars and that stinky man with the long dry fingers comes in and puts sticks up our butts and then jabs us with sharp things while our owner HOLDS US DOWN?"

WhoDat: "Yeah, dat place sucks. Just about de time we start tinkin' our slave owners are cool, dey load us up and take us to dat hell hole. And sometimes dey even LEAVE us dere for a few days! And hey, I'm not sure...but I tink dat's where dey took Big Mama when she got dose lumps all over her, cuz dey smelled like dat place when dey come home crying. And as you know...Big Mama never came home again..."

Josie: "Yeah and I think I know what happened to her. But let me tell you what happened to ME. You're not going to believe it. You know how we've talked about starting a family? Well, that's out of the question. They took me in there, and just left me in a cell. Dogs all around me were crying and howling, so I knew it was bad. The next morning that girl who tries to act nice came in talking all sweet to me, but I wasn't falling for it. Sure enough, she caught me and slipped the noose over my neck and dragged me down the hall. Then Stinky Man came in and -yep, you guessed it - stabbed me with sharp things. Next thing I knew, I woke up in another prison cell and I was so sore. I had a big piece of bed stuff wrapped around me for some weird reason so of course I tore all that off. And you WON'T BELIEVE what I say!"

WhoDat: "What dat, what dat? What choo say you saw?"

Josie starts to cry. WhoDat nuzzles her ear and then starts sniffing down her body.

WhoDat: "Girl, what dey do to you? What's dis bad place on your belly?"

Josie: "I'm so ashamed - I'll never be the same again! I think...I think..."

WhoDat: "What! You don't mean..."

Josie: "Yes...I do. I think...I think they took my girl parts out!"

WhoDat (shocked): "I been hearin' about dis! Why dey do dat? Who dey tink dey are, cuttin and maimin you and takin your joy like dat? Why dey wanna do dat? Dey act all nice, like dey love us, and all de time dey wanna mess our lives up!"

Josie: "I don't know baby, but I know this, cuz I heard them say it..."

WhoDat: "What dey say?"

Josie: "They say you're next."


My point is this - Just as my dogs can never fully grasp how people who seem to love them can allow, and even condone and organize, what they think are bad things happening in their lives - we can never, from our human perspective, fully grasp the big picture of how God works through all the events in our lives.

We have a limited perspective.
 

jarofthoughts

Empirical Curmudgeon
Well, it goes without saying that there is a lot more reality out there than we know about now - and that it's within our human capacity to continue to learn more every single day for aeons. That's not my point though. My point is that as humans with five (some would say six) senses, and all the other limitations of humanity, there is reality out there which we are simply unable to grasp or comprehend. Ever.

As I said, it is certainly possible. At this point though, we don't know.
I think you will find this talk by Richard Dawkins interesting.

[youtube]1APOxsp1VFw[/youtube]
YouTube - Richard Dawkins on our "queer" universe

Definitely? You simply do not know this and cannot know this definitely. No offense, but this is, simply your opinion.

Well, I am going by what you and others have told me, and by your descriptions they match the experiences documented while using the 'god helmet' quite accurately.

A lot more than you probably realize. You are making a classic mistake - assuming that theists are theists by default and that reasonable, intelligent, objective, inquisitive people with many life experiences under their belt have not carefully considered other possibilities and explanations...and found them lacking.

Oh, I certainly see that as a possibility, and I know theists like that. While I have no data to back this assumption up it seems as is if they are in a minority.

Nor does your unbelief make it UNtrue.

No, but I don't make a habit of believing in things just because they are convenient, comforting or even practical. I want to know how it works and I care a great deal about keeping my view of reality free of concepts that has no empirical backing. :)
 
Last edited:
Top