Response: There's the statement. Where's the proof?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Quran is free of errors
- Thread starter Zhakir
- Start date
Response: There's the statement. Where's the proof?
gnostic
The Lost One
Two could play this childish game.
Where is your proof, fatihah?
You've provided no logical explanation of our body be made out of clay, let alone evidences to support your fairytale claim; hence you have no proof.
You say God could do anything, and yet you can't provide evidence that God even exist. If God can do all the things that the Qur'an or your interpretations claimed, then you are the one who need to provide the evidences.
Doctors, coroners and scientists have done DNA and found that our genetics (genome) have no clay particles or molecules. So the Qur'an and your interpretation are based solely on belief and faith, not scientific evidences that have been validated.
Clay molecule/particle (silicate or iron and aluminum hydroxide) have very specific crystal structures at atomic level, and none of which are presented in the human body.
Do you know what I talking about, when I speak of molecule? Or crystal structure?
Clay molecules don't simply break down into separate individual atoms. And you keep forgetting that there are not enough silicon, aluminum or even iron to make clay, even though these 3 elements are present in our body.
Look it up in chemistry book, or do google or wiki search, instead of keep embarrassing yourself and Islam what you don't understand.
Where is your proof, fatihah?
You've provided no logical explanation of our body be made out of clay, let alone evidences to support your fairytale claim; hence you have no proof.
You say God could do anything, and yet you can't provide evidence that God even exist. If God can do all the things that the Qur'an or your interpretations claimed, then you are the one who need to provide the evidences.
Doctors, coroners and scientists have done DNA and found that our genetics (genome) have no clay particles or molecules. So the Qur'an and your interpretation are based solely on belief and faith, not scientific evidences that have been validated.
Clay molecule/particle (silicate or iron and aluminum hydroxide) have very specific crystal structures at atomic level, and none of which are presented in the human body.
Do you know what I talking about, when I speak of molecule? Or crystal structure?
Clay molecules don't simply break down into separate individual atoms. And you keep forgetting that there are not enough silicon, aluminum or even iron to make clay, even though these 3 elements are present in our body.
Look it up in chemistry book, or do google or wiki search, instead of keep embarrassing yourself and Islam what you don't understand.
[QUOTE:gnostic]Two could play this childish game.
Where is your proof, fatihah?
You've provided no logical explanation of our body be made out of clay, let alone evidences to support your fairytale claim; hence you have no proof.(End quote)
Response: Post 1052 of page 106 and post 961 of page 97 prove to the contrary.
Where is your proof, fatihah?
You've provided no logical explanation of our body be made out of clay, let alone evidences to support your fairytale claim; hence you have no proof.(End quote)
Response: Post 1052 of page 106 and post 961 of page 97 prove to the contrary.
Response: Then I would advise you to set it back.
gnostic
The Lost One
And please learn to quote properly. You have posted over 1100 posts, so you should have known how to do so properly by now. Here is a hint:
Use the equal sign (=) instead of colon (:) in between the quote and person's name, and instead of "End quote", use square brackets [] with "/quote" inside the brackets.
Use the equal sign (=) instead of colon (:) in between the quote and person's name, and instead of "End quote", use square brackets [] with "/quote" inside the brackets.
[QUOTE:gnostic]And please learn to quote properly. You have posted over 1100 posts, so you should have known how to do so properly by now. Here is a hint:
Use the equal sign (=) instead of colon (:) in between the quote and person's name, and instead of "End quote", use square brackets [] with "/quote" inside the brackets.[/QUOTE]
Response: I'm fine the way it is.
Use the equal sign (=) instead of colon (:) in between the quote and person's name, and instead of "End quote", use square brackets [] with "/quote" inside the brackets.[/QUOTE]
Response: I'm fine the way it is.
gnostic
The Lost One
It would be easier for people to read your post if you can quote properly. They would know where the quote begins and ends.
Change the QUOTE:gnostic to QUOTE=gnostic within the square brackets.
At the end of the quote, use /QUOTE inside the square brackets. eg. [/quote]
Surely this is not hard, even for you.
If the beginning of your quote has a semi-column and number, edit your post and delete both the semi-column and number.
SIMPLE.
Change the QUOTE:gnostic to QUOTE=gnostic within the square brackets.
At the end of the quote, use /QUOTE inside the square brackets. eg. [/quote]
Surely this is not hard, even for you.
If the beginning of your quote has a semi-column and number, edit your post and delete both the semi-column and number.
SIMPLE.
kai
ragamuffin
Lol it is exactly what I am talking about in the "Evolution, what a lie" thread started by brother Eselam. In a very small nutshell, (correct me if I am wrong Muslim brothers), Allah is criticizing (?) humans for accepting the "free will" of whether to worship Allah or not. Everything denied the responsibility - therefore submissive to Allah - (except for Jinn and man) because it would then mean enrolling themselves in a test, ergo: punishment or reward as a result.
Now this is without any research, so....
Peace be upon.
---------
Whatever written of Truth and benefit is only due to Allah’s Assistance and Guidance, and whatever of error is of me. Allah Alone Knows Best and He is the Only Source of Strength.
Ok can you or anyone for that matter ,explain how everything else except Jin and Man rejected the "free will" of Allah without having the "free will" to do so in the first place?
Last edited:
[QUOTE:gnostic]It would be easier for people to read your post if you can quote properly. They would know where the quote begins and ends.(End quote)
Response: A person will read it with the same eaze. You don't establish the authority on what's proper.
Quote: gnostic
Change the QUOTE:gnostic to QUOTE=gnostic within the square brackets.
At the end of the quote, use /QUOTE inside the square brackets. eg. [/quote]
Surely this is not hard, even for you.
If the beginning of your quote has a semi-column and number, edit your post and delete both the semi-column and number.
SIMPLE.(End quote)
Response: So is the other way.
Response: A person will read it with the same eaze. You don't establish the authority on what's proper.
Quote: gnostic
Change the QUOTE:gnostic to QUOTE=gnostic within the square brackets.
At the end of the quote, use /QUOTE inside the square brackets. eg. [/quote]
Surely this is not hard, even for you.
If the beginning of your quote has a semi-column and number, edit your post and delete both the semi-column and number.
SIMPLE.(End quote)
Response: So is the other way.
themadhair
Well-Known Member
Fatihah will not use [quotе][/quotе] tags because the intention is to keep the discussion as chaotic and as incomprehensible as possible. This is also the reason why Fatihah continually demands a double standard of asking others for a level of proof/evidence that Fatihah has not, and will not, meet.
Fatihah contributes nothing to the discussion. Absolutely nothing. We know the claims that the koran makes, and simply repeating them ad nauseum, while issuing the same tired refrain of “I see a statement. Where’s the proof” in complete ignorance to what has been presented, is not debate. It is pointless self-indoctrination.
Fatihah contributes nothing to the discussion. Absolutely nothing. We know the claims that the koran makes, and simply repeating them ad nauseum, while issuing the same tired refrain of “I see a statement. Where’s the proof” in complete ignorance to what has been presented, is not debate. It is pointless self-indoctrination.
Response: There's the statement. Where's the proof?
YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
The proof is written all over RF, in virtually any thread you have "contributed" to.
Response: Likewise.
themadhair
Well-Known Member
If I belonged to the same group as Fatihah I’d be feeling embarrassed right about now.
Response: Likewise.
darkendless
Guardian of Asgaard
I'm not embarrassed, I'm proud of my good brother.
Tashan, as one of the most respected muslims on this forum and whose contributions are always valid and appreciated, perhaps you might be able to explain to Fatihah the discussion we had earlier in this thread. It appears that my words mean nothing to him, even though when you and i had the same discussion, we came to a rapid conclusion. I feel if you were to explain it to Fatihah, he might accept it.
themadhair
Well-Known Member
Proud of what exactly? Proud that, despite displaying some of the most shocking ignorance and scientific illiteracy I’ve ever seen on any website, Fatihah is sticking up for the koran? Proud that, despite displaying some of the most shocking lack of debating and comprehension skills I’ve ever seen on any website, Fatihah is still defending the koran? Proud that, despite displaying some of the most shocking levels of internal inconsistency I’ve ever seen on any website, Fatihah is still standing firm behind the koran?
At least the Christians seem to have a monocle of sense to the point they there are a fair few who feel embarrassed by their overly-literalistic brethren. But that all the Muslims who have commented on this thread think Fatihah, and the literalistic brand of koranic science Fatihah is advocating, is someone/something to be proud of?
That is staggering.
At least the Christians seem to have a monocle of sense to the point they there are a fair few who feel embarrassed by their overly-literalistic brethren. But that all the Muslims who have commented on this thread think Fatihah, and the literalistic brand of koranic science Fatihah is advocating, is someone/something to be proud of?
That is staggering.
I'm not embarrassed, I'm proud of my good brother.
Response: Shurkran. Jazak'Allah, brother.