But I’m not in the foxhole and in a situation where I need to be logical.Glad is a feeling and not logic, so you just confirmed his point.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But I’m not in the foxhole and in a situation where I need to be logical.Glad is a feeling and not logic, so you just confirmed his point.
And your subjective opinion about the BBC is relevant because.....?For my money, the BBC has lost all credibility in the last few years. They seem to have totally bought in to the progressive "oppressed vs. oppressor" worldview. So OF COURSE, if you take the O vs. O worldview, it couldn't possibly be the immigrants that are causing the problems because "oppression".
So you think Starmer is more of a liar than Johnson. Seriously?I disagree
But I’m not in the foxhole and in a situation where I need to be logical.
So you think Starmer is more of a liar than Johnson. Seriously?
But you still have to answer about your claim as per being logical about refugee. You haven't been logic so far.
hmmm...And your subjective opinion about the BBC is relevant because.....?
This is the Brexit playbook, foreigners are bad even if they are fleeing persecution.Wow. You are ACTUALLY serious.
Do you or do you not know the difference between immigrants and asylum seekers?
Also, are you genuinely arguing that countries just shouldn't allow ANY immigration? You think ALL IMMIGRANTS are nothing but a drain?
Is that an argument you seriously want to make?
You're am embarrassment to my country.
What is logic to you?.
No wonder you voted for brexit. Johnson lied every time he opened his mouth.Absolutely.
No wonder you voted for brexit. Johnson lied every time he opened his mouth.
Well, in a sense the base is the 3 classical laws of human thought. And then you can add all the fallacies to avoid and Agrippa's trilemma.
Then of course you end up in valid and sound as per reasoning as per deduction.
I'm sincerely curious to understand how you think countries should deal with immigrants and then separately with refugees?This is the Brexit playbook, foreigners are bad even if they are fleeing persecution.
Well, in a sense the base is the 3 classical laws of human thought. And then you can add all the fallacies to avoid and Agrippa's trilemma.
Then of course you end up in valid and sound as per reasoning as per deduction.
But you've just said Starmer "absolutely" lies more than Starmer. For starters, ask Johnson's ex-wives. He faced a 90 day ban for repeatedly lying to the Commons over partygate. You missed that I take it?Whether he lied or not doesn’t mean people were influenced by them,in the beginning he was a remoaner,he jumped on the winning horse,that’s his only achievement.
So if you are running from Syria for example and make it to say France which is secular,you get fed and water why run further.
They were fined, so I guess it was.Was it ever prosecuted?
Yes, it is true. You can check it out as an issue below (you have to switch the topic leaving EU option on at the top and switch the rest off). Before 2016, its importance had a big spike to 38% in 2011, before falling back down. It didn't really become a big issue again until after the referendum in 2016.Not true
And they shouldn't be. We'd have a Labour, Lib Dem, Green coalition under PR, which would be a better outcome, and more democratic.That’s democracy,a majority wins,if it wasn’t first past the post labour wouldn’t be in the position they are
Obviously didn't read what I said. The poor are worse off now due to Brexit, but the rich are, as always, doing just fine. The Brexiteers who conned the poor into voting for Brexit have done fine. Nigel got his kids German passport, Dyson relocated his firm to Singapore...You hit the nail on the head,the poor got zero from being in the EU,the rich of course got richer from cheap labour and priced the poor out of a job.
I cited them as a news source - there are others about the same subject, if you do a search.Well you cited them as some sort of authority, and I'm questioning their objectivity
But you've just said Starmer "absolutely" lies more than Starmer. For starters, ask Johnson's ex-wives. He faced a 90 day ban for repeatedly lying to the Commons over partygate. You missed that I take it?
Why, well, that is not logic as I understand it. That is you wanting to decide for another human the reasons they have for choosing the UK over France.
If you with only logic can explain that, I will listen but why as such, is not logic. If it is, you have to unpack it.