HonestJoe
Well-Known Member
Yes, I’ve quite specifically not made any gender-specific references. I’ve also highlighted that rape is only one potential threat the we could be considered “responsible” for taking reasonable actions to avoid.Does this view cross over to males? Women always get hit with a "responsible by actions" clause.
I agree. As I said in my first reply, it’s important to completely separate the guilt of the criminal and the actions of the victim. If a criminal takes advantage of someone who is unconscious to rape or rob them that’s the same crime regardless of whether the victim is unconscious because they chose to get blind drunk or because of some illness. If the person is lucky enough not to be targeted by a criminal though, it would be considered perfectly legitimate to treat their getting blind drunk very differently to treating their being ill (indeed, it would seem odd to treat them in the same manner).Female, or male, getting stupid and walking down an alley inebriated and nude, still gives no rights to a rapist.