Ingledsva
HEATHEN ALASKAN
InChrist said:BTW, this thread is about the Return of Christ,...
They thought Jesus had completed the first part of prophecy and would be right back to finish it.
*
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
InChrist said:BTW, this thread is about the Return of Christ,...
Is it ok to disagree with Paul?
Or must Paul be accepted as infallible ?
I don't think Paul was bad per say. I think he did what he thought was right. I just don't agree with some of his ideals.
So say a person agrees with Jesus but finds reason to disagree with some of Paul's teachings, would that person still receive salvation.
I think I agree though, Paul elevates Jesus to divinity. Eliminate Paul and Jesus becomes a Rabbi.
They thought Jesus had completed the first part of prophecy and would be right back to finish it.
*
The Second Coming of Jesus is for clarifying that Jesus was not god; and it is Paul's work to elevate him to divinity.
Regards
I believe Paul's job was to infiltrate the group and take them off course.
It doesn't actually say anywhere that Jesus is God/trinity.
They came from the Jewish religion with God being ONE only, and the Messiah being a special HUMAN sent from God to do a job.
*
Ingledsva said:I believe Paul's job was to infiltrate the group and take them off course.
It doesn't actually say anywhere that Jesus is God/trinity.
They came from the Jewish religion with God being ONE only, and the Messiah being a special HUMAN sent from God to do a job.
I've said many times that Christianity is more than that, but you just don't seem to understand, or not want to understand. Your idea of what Christianity is, is completely secular as if you are only reading the NT and getting all your information from there, yet you would never do that with other religions. You haven't done your homework, basically, and it's giving you a warped view of the religion.
LOL! How exactly am I not understanding, and only reading the Christian Bible, - when I am talking about the expected JEWISH Messiah from the Jewish view?
The expected JEWISH Messiah is a special human sent from YHVH - not a God. YHVH is ONE only.
*
*
They thought Jesus had completed the first part of prophecy and would be right back to finish it.
*
Uh, yeah, nevermind. Has it even occurred to you that I know your viewpoint? And that I know you can't look at Christianity that way? That's what you're not getting here, I already know everything you're saying, and it isn't accurate as to how one should view Christianity. It's the same with Judaism, you likewise make similar mistakes because of the methodology in which you are interpreting Scripture, and applying your logic to traditions etc.
That is hilarious coming from you - who tell us you are a non-traditional Christian.
And you don't like me taking info straight from the Bible??? LOL???
There is a difference between what the Bible actually says - and the "traditions" made-up by man.
*
Not sure what this means...?
You think you can make up your own tradition? and then call me out for actually using the texts?
*
Nope, it's about reading the traditions of various churches, then there is no way you can simplify Christianity in the manner you do, it has nothing to do with my personal beliefs.
The expected JEWISH Messiah is a special human sent from YHVH - not a God. YHVH is ONE only.
*
I think what many of the Jewish religious leaders of Jesus' day missed and many still miss today (not just Jews) is that YHWH states He is the only ONE who is the Savior (Isaiah 43:11; 45:21), then Jesus birth, life, death, and resurrection fulfilled many detailed messianic prophecies
ING - You seem to be missing a few obvious points.
It is the awaited Jewish Messiah. Jesus was claiming to be that Messiah.
That Messiah was to be a special human, not a God - there is only ONE God.
Isaiah is NOT about Jesus. Emmanuel is Isaiah's son by the Temple Virgin.
*
As to Isaiah 43:11 and 45:21 - you are making the same mistake many Christians make because Christianity in its Bible translations "fudges" what is actually being said, - by, for instance, putting "Lord" instead of YHVH. Christians then assume it is talking about Jesus. Both verses are about YHVH.
As you should know - the only ONE that can actually bring salvation - in the Jewish sense - by sending a special "human" Messiah - is YHVH.
YHVH is not Jesus - and those YHVH verses are not about Jesus.
Isaiah 43:11 I, I am YHVH; and without Me there is no Rescue/Salvation.
Isaiah 45:21 Declare and bring near; yea, let them consult together. Who has revealed this of old; who has told it from then? Is it not I, YHVH? And there is no Elohiym other than Me; a just El and a Savior; compared to Me they are nothing.
and the NT records that at first Jewish individuals and groups testified that He was the Savior of the world, the promised Christ, Messiah (Luke 2:11; John 4:42). This testimony has continued since that time and throughout history in the lives of multitudes, including many Jewish people.
ING - He would still fit under such as the expected SPECIAL HUMAN Messiah, sent by YHVH, whom was expected to bring the end, and final Judgment.
I believe this reveals that Jesus (the SON) is YHWH who interacted with the nation of Israel in the past, who personally in flesh (who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;
ING - NOPE! Isaiah is about Emmanuel Isaiah's Son, the war over Jerusalem, and has a lot of YHVH verses. There is NO JESUS in these Jewish verses.
rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant,being made in human likeness Philippians 2:6-7) and paid for the sins of humanity, and who has promised, in both the Hebrew scriptures
ING - Again, NO Jesus anywhere in the Hebrew scriptures.
and NT to come again to save His people, deliver Israel, judge the wicked and reign upon the earth from Jerusalem (Isaiah 9:7; 16:5; Zechariah 14:4; Luke 21:25-27; Rev. 22:12-20).
For He is coming, for He is coming to judge the earth. He shall judge the world with righteousness, And the peoples with His truth. Psalm 96:13
LOL! And where does that say they agreed with him?
They are astonished that the creep chasing them is claiming a vision giving him control.
Winning over Damascus Jews doesn't mean he fooled the disciples.
A few verses later we get this -
Act 9:26 And when Saul was come to Jerusalem, he assayed to join himself to the disciples: but they were all afraid of him, and believed not that he was a disciple.
Act 9:29 And he spake boldly in the name of the Lord Jesus, and disputed against the Grecians: but they went about to slay him.
Act 9:30 Which when the brethren knew, they brought him down to Caesarea, and sent him forth to Tarsus.
*
Apostles were sent to the group later know as the "Hellenists," too.
Obviously these disciples and their followers, did not believe in Paul.
Apparently they had enough common sense not to trust someone that had tried to Kill Christians, - and was now taking over - "claiming" a vision on the road.
Others were against these new teachings as well -
ACTS 6:8-15 8 And Stephen, full of faith and power, did great wonders and signs among the people. 9 Then there arose some from what is called the Synagogue of the Freedmen (Cyrenians, Alexandrians, and those from Cilicia and Asia), disputing with Stephen. 10 And they were not able to resist the wisdom and the Spirit by which he spoke. 11 Then they secretly induced men to say, We have heard him speak blasphemous words against Moses and God. 12 And they stirred up the people, the elders, and the scribes; and they came upon him, seized him, and brought him to the council. 13 They also set up false witnesses who said, This man does not cease to speak blasphemous words against this holy place and the law; 14 for we have heard him say that this Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place and change the customs which Moses delivered to us.
These and other verses show that Paul was not readily accepted by all.
*
They agreed with him enough to pass down a creed that was formulated within 5 years of the cross, as Paul himself stated (1Corin 15:3-7)
Um, he preached that Jesus is the Son of God, Ingle. He had previously approved of Stephen getting stoned for proclaiming the Word, now all of a sudden, HE was proclaiming the Word. So yes, they were astonished.
He said he met with Peter and James..and was eventually given the creed, Ingle. So apparently, he did fool the disciples.
They were skeptical about him at first, as I'm sure people would have been skeptical about Hitler after the Holocaust if afterwards he suddenly became a Jew.
The fact of the matter is, Paul was accepted by PETER and JAMES. That is all that matters. Peter was a first hand source that testified directly to the Resurrection, and he was one of Jesus' right hand men. If Paul was good enough to be accepted by Peter, a person that Jesus DIRECTLY choose to be one of his disciples, then Paul should be accepted by individuals who lived more than 2000 years later that are typing on religious forums.
And again - as the awaited JEWISH Messiah, which he was claiming to be, - he could still do these. In fact this Messiah is to bring the Final Judgment. AND - this Messiah is NOT God.
*