• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Russian chest thumping - Chinese incursions

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
As you don't trust Maria Zakharova or media approved of by the Kremlin,
I don't trust media approved of by Soros.
The difference is that I can easily prove that a lot of media approved by the Kremlin is false. Hence the numerous times I proved you lied.

I do respect your mistrust but I expect you to trust mine.
There is also the possibility to debate civilly and to find points we can agree on. :)
Not if you are insistent on lying, which you clearly want to do.

If you really are interested in civil debate, you can begin by demonstrating your good faith and honesty by, first, providing the "confidential documents that prove Putin wants peace", second, acknowledging and admitting that you lied about Poroshenko, and third, providing all the evidence that Ukraine - or NATO or "the west" or whoever - "forced" Russia to invade Ukraine for political reasons.

When you demonstrate honesty, you demonstrate that good faith debate is possible.

I don't think it is, and I don't think you will.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
The difference is that I can easily prove that a lot of media approved by the Kremlin is false. Hence the numerous times I proved you lied.


Not if you are insistent on lying, which you clearly want to do.

If you really are interested in civil debate, you can begin by demonstrating your good faith and honesty by, first, providing the "confidential documents that prove Putin wants peace", second, acknowledging and admitting that you lied about Poroshenko, and third, providing all the evidence that Ukraine - or NATO or "the west" or whoever - "forced" Russia to invade Ukraine for political reasons.

When you demonstrate honesty, you demonstrate that good faith debate is possible.

I don't think it is, and I don't think you will.

I have never lied about Putin. I have never lied about Poroshenko.
Putin does want peace: as long as Ukrainians acknowledge the autonomy of Donbas, Crimea, Kharkiv, Zhaporizhzha.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
I have never lied about Putin.
You claimed to have "confidential documents that proved Putin wants peace". I asked you to provide them. You ignored my requests and then deleted your claim.

You lied.

I have never lied about Poroshenko.
You claimed Poroshenko made a speech in which he threatened the people of Donbas. He did not. He plainly stated that the people of the Dobas would be won over peacefully because the controlling Russian separatists will deprive them of rights, but that Ukraine would not.

You lied.

Putin does want peace: as long as Ukrainians acknowledge the autonomy of Donbas, Crimea, Kharkiv, Zhaporizhzha.
Why should they acknowledge the autonomy of areas stolen from them by a corrupt, tyranical imperilaist?

If I broke into your house and seized control of your bedroom by violently punching you in the face, dragging you outside, and then refusing to leave, do you think it is reasonable to say I want "peace" just as long as you recognize that your bedroom is now mine and you have to let me have it, otherwise I will keep punching you and dragging you outside until you do?

No.

Putin invaded.

He does not want peace.

He wants Ukraine.

Stop lying.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Both Zelenskyy and Soros are Jewish. Makes you wonder to what degree antisemitism plays in the attempt to paint them as villains.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
So does this mean you agree that Italy should give their land to Putin so that the Ukrainians may keep their own? You said sacrifices should be made for peace, after all.
He would never accept.
Because he wants those land, which are filled with Russian speaking people who want to join the Russian Federation. He is not interested in Italy.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Both Zelenskyy and Soros are Jewish. Makes you wonder to what degree antisemitism plays in the attempt to paint them as villains.

Seymour Hersh said that the Americans were in on it, as for the sabotage of Nordstream.
He is Jewish.

Is he right or wrong?
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
He would never accept.
Because he wants those land, which are filled with Russian speaking people who want to join the Russian Federation. He is not interested in Italy.
Weird how these lands only suddenly became "filled with Russian speaking people who want to join the Russian Federation" after he illegally annexed them and held a series of extremely poorly regulated referendums without any independent or international oversight.

Are you ever going to stop defending imperialism? What kind of socialist are you?
 

lukethethird

unknown member
What evidence exists of widespread, state-sanctioned torture or rape of Russian speaking Ukrainians in East Ukraine?

I educated myself by reading up on the history of Ukraine since the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990, but it appears not many others on this thread have cared to do that. I would say that one side in this conflict is in no way morally superior to the other, but one would never get that impression by the narrative the mainstream media presents us with.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
He would never accept.
Because he wants those land, which are filled with Russian speaking people who want to join the Russian Federation. He is not in interested in Italy.
Let them migrate back to Russia if they want to be a part of it.

From what I've read, Romanians are the largest immigrant group in Italy, so perhaps your area should be annexed by Romania.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It's the height of hypocrisy for China to threaten
retaliation for our downing their surveillance balloon
that traversed the entire continental USA.
After all they downed one of our surveillance planes
that was operating in international waters, & nearly
killed everyone on board.

I expect that China's & Putin's apologists will commit
whataboutism by accusing USA of various sins. This
is to avoid implicating the real provocateur....China.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Italians do make a good shotgun though.
The Benelli M4 is tough, & survives being
dropped when given up while surrendering.

I think that an alliance is made up of mutual respect. If the US wants to respect its allies, they are supposed to listen to them. Destroying Libya wasn't fair to Italy.
 
Last edited:

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Is this one of the reasons Italy sides with Russia?
After Nine Eleven the Mediterranean area became more and more unstable. So we were hoping the US would be on the side of the West by favoring peace in this area of the world.
Electing Obama was absolutely suicidal, considering the wars and turmoil his administration unleashed.
Trump, on the contrary favored peace everywhere.
 
Last edited:

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
I educated myself by reading up on the history of Ukraine since the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990, but it appears not many others on this thread have cared to do that. I would say that one side in this conflict is in no way morally superior to the other, but one would never get that impression by the narrative the mainstream media presents us with.
That's not what I asked. I am fairly well up on Ukraine's history post-USSR, the Euromaidan protests, etc. What I asked is whether or not there is evidence that violence or oppression against Russia-affiliated people in the Donbas was either widespread or directly attributable to the Ukrainian government. Does such evidence exist? Because, to my knowledge, the violence was neither government-sanctioned nor widespread.
 
Top