• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Searching for one secular reason to ban gay marriage

lilithu

The Devil's Advocate
Since when do you have to go through a church to get married? I didn't. No one's trying to force the churches who don't want to perform marriage ceremonies for homosexual couples into doing it - there are plenty of willing churches who would like the option, not to mention JOP ceremonies.
That's not what Bright-ness was saying. He was saying that the only reason why same-sex marriage is a political issue is because some religious people are trying to impose their views of marriage on secular society.
 

jamaesi

To Save A Lamb
It also may be because they know some people may not want to recieve blood from gay men because of the risk of HIV screened or not screened - you know how the human brain works, especially with HIV. People are so scared of it! I mean most people think you can catch it from a small cut when you cant! as HIV dies once exposed to oxygen! Obviously you cant see where the blood has come from so its better to stop Gay men all together! I wouldnt mind recieving blood from a gay person, but I bet you that there are people out there who would! Unfortunately that is the world we live in - different opinions!

PS- Black heterosexual women have the highest rates of HIV/AIDS. Not homosexuals.

Your blood donation argument just shot itself in the foot.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
Prohibiting gay marriage does many wrongs, but one wrong that is not so often considered: It denies the rights of those religious people and institutions that actually want to marry gay couples.
 

Nanda

Polyanna
That's not what Bright-ness was saying. He was saying that the only reason why same-sex marriage is a political issue is because some religious people are trying to impose their views of marriage on secular society.

Sorry, it wasn't obvious or apparent from the post. :shrug:

Bright-ness said:
The only secular reason I can think of is that the separation of church and state is being abused.

Seemed to me like he was referring to the OP, namely, a secular reason to ban gay marriage.
 

Prometheus

Semper Perconctor
I don't think it was mentioned to laws yet that lesbians have lower rates of HIV/AIDS than heterosexuals. If it's already been said then I'm not too observant.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
It also may be because they know some people may not want to recieve blood from gay men because of the risk of HIV screened or not screened - you know how the human brain works, especially with HIV. People are so scared of it! I mean most people think you can catch it from a small cut when you cant! as HIV dies once exposed to oxygen!
(This is off topic, but I feel it's important to share)
The Red Cross and blood centers do a terrific job of screening blood donations.
As for catching it, you are wrong (I think I might not be clear as to what you mean on the small cut part though) . You can indeed cath HIV, and many other infections, through even a small cut. HIV is passed through bodily fluids, which include sexual fluids, blood (the blood itself is carriers oxygen), and saliva. The universal blood handling procedures mention the use of gloves, because finger tips and around the nails are a common place for open wounds that you don't know of. OSHA even requires gloves to be worn when you handle blood to reduce the chances of catching HIV incase the person that bleed is a carrier, and even has training videos about proper handling procedures. I believe the actual HIV virus can live for up to 2 days outside of the human body. Another import factor is you can be a carrier and not show any symptoms.
http://www.webmd.com/hiv-aids/guide/hiv2?page=1
http://www.webmd.com/hiv-aids/guide/hiv-aids-what-raises-risk
http://www.thebody.com/content/art6073.html
http://www.webmd.com/hiv-aids/tc/Human-Immunodeficiency-Virus-HIV-Infection-Prevention
I recomend you read the articles in the above links. Gays are mentioned as a risk factor, but thier are also many more sexual contacts that are as well.
 

lilithu

The Devil's Advocate
That's ridiculous. They don't tell you who you're getting blood from. They don't even know themselves, once it's been taken and screened; it's just anonymous fluids. People don't get to be picky and choosey about where their blood comes from. Can you imagine? Think of a Klansman in desperate need of a transfusion turning his nose up at the blood that will save his life because it came from a black person. Unbelievable...
Reminds me of an episode of "All in the Family" where Archie gets a blood transfusion from a black man, and he has to come to terms with the fact that he has "black blood" flowing in his veins.

Man, they don't make television like that any more. And the few intelligent shows we have on tv get canceled because no one watches them. For example, "30 Rock" is on the chopping block. :(
 

UnityNow101

Well-Known Member
Good old Archie Bunker...I can never get enough of those old episodes. They truly do not make tv comedies like that anymore.
 

Truth_Faith13

Well-Known Member
I don't think it was mentioned to laws yet that lesbians have lower rates of HIV/AIDS than heterosexuals. If it's already been said then I'm not too observant.

If you read the posts back, we were talking about Gay MEN!!! I know lesbian women have lower rates - we were not talking about them! :)
 

Truth_Faith13

Well-Known Member
(This is off topic, but I feel it's important to share)
The Red Cross and blood centers do a terrific job of screening blood donations.
As for catching it, you are wrong (I think I might not be clear as to what you mean on the small cut part though) . You can indeed cath HIV, and many other infections, through even a small cut. HIV is passed through bodily fluids, which include sexual fluids, blood (the blood itself is carriers oxygen), and saliva. The universal blood handling procedures mention the use of gloves, because finger tips and around the nails are a common place for open wounds that you don't know of. OSHA even requires gloves to be worn when you handle blood to reduce the chances of catching HIV incase the person that bleed is a carrier, and even has training videos about proper handling procedures. I believe the actual HIV virus can live for up to 2 days outside of the human body. Another import factor is you can be a carrier and not show any symptoms.
http://www.webmd.com/hiv-aids/guide/hiv2?page=1
http://www.webmd.com/hiv-aids/guide/hiv-aids-what-raises-risk
http://www.thebody.com/content/art6073.html
http://www.webmd.com/hiv-aids/tc/Human-Immunodeficiency-Virus-HIV-Infection-Prevention
I recomend you read the articles in the above links. Gays are mentioned as a risk factor, but thier are also many more sexual contacts that are as well.

Ok not all blood in the body is oxygenated! some is deoxygenated! HIV dies when it comes into contact with oxygen! I am a carer so have to keep taking courses - one of these was Infection Control! The tutor there explained to me that HIV cannot/very highly unlikely to be caught through small cuts! you would have to seriously open the wound to catch it! It is unlikely that someone trained in the area would be wrong - but hey! I am only repeating what I heard! and it does make sense to me!
About the being a carrier and not showing any symptoms - thats true! You cant tell who has got HIV and who hasnt! onlt they and their doctors would know!
 

Truth_Faith13

Well-Known Member
PS- Black heterosexual women have the highest rates of HIV/AIDS. Not homosexuals.

Your blood donation argument just shot itself in the foot.

True but your thinking about a different thing - I cant thing of the terminology, my brain is fried at the moment from too much revision :)

Black women do have the highest rates of HIV
Gay men have the highest ABILITY TO CONTRACT IT! and too pass it on through sexual intercourse! It is less likely for women (of any sexuality) to pass it on. It goes for heteresexual men too - men are more likely to pass the virus on!
 

Truth_Faith13

Well-Known Member
That's ridiculous. They don't tell you who you're getting blood from. They don't even know themselves, once it's been taken and screened; it's just anonymous fluids. People don't get to be picky and choosey about where their blood comes from. Can you imagine? Think of a Klansman in desperate need of a transfusion turning his nose up at the blood that will save his life because it came from a black person. Unbelievable...

Who was saying they tell you where the blood comes from? Im not saying I am like that, I am just saying some people are (unfortunately).
 

Truth_Faith13

Well-Known Member
Noone ever answered one of my questions as to why this thread was started in the first place? and I think it seems to have gone of topic (prob my fault) and we seem to be arguing Gays/Lesbians full stop rather than the marriage!!!

In case your wondering, Im not sure what my views are on Gays/lesbians are. Im just throwing ideas out. I think the problem is (and I dont mean to insult here.) I find it weird! I dont find it wrong, Its just not something the world is used to yet! In a couple of generations, with people who have been more brought up with it, it will be much more accepted as it will be considered the "norm". :)
 

lilithu

The Devil's Advocate
Im just throwing ideas out. I think the problem is (and I dont mean to insult here.) I find it weird! I dont find it wrong, Its just not something the world is used to yet! In a couple of generations, with people who have been more brought up with it, it will be much more accepted as it will be considered the "norm". :)
I understand that you think it's weird, and that's ok. But you can't expect BGLT to wait a couple of generations for people to get used to them. This is their life too.

And btw, when I was a kid I thought it was weird too. I don't anymore. It doesn't take generations. All it takes is being willing to put one's socially conditioned reactions aside and talk to people as people.
 

Truth_Faith13

Well-Known Member
I understand that you think it's weird, and that's ok. But you can't expect BGLT to wait a couple of generations for people to get used to them. This is their life too.

And btw, when I was a kid I thought it was weird too. I don't anymore. It doesn't take generations. All it takes is being willing to put one's socially conditioned reactions aside and talk to people as people.

hmmm, BGLT? :)
 

Truth_Faith13

Well-Known Member
fantôme profane;806682 said:
It’s a new kind of gourmet sandwich – bacon, guacamole, lettuce and tomato.:drool: It may seem a little bit weird at first, but give it a chance. It’s not going to hurt anyone. :eat:

Love it!!!! :)
 

Mike182

Flaming Queer
I understand that you think it's weird, and that's ok. But you can't expect BGLT to wait a couple of generations for people to get used to them. This is their life too.

And btw, when I was a kid I thought it was weird too. I don't anymore. It doesn't take generations. All it takes is being willing to put one's socially conditioned reactions aside and talk to people as people.

hey, i went through a stage of hating gay people when i was 12-13... i was just young, angry and confused.

laws28186 said:
True but your thinking about a different thing - I cant thing of the terminology, my brain is fried at the moment from too much revision :)

Black women do have the highest rates of HIV
Gay men have the highest ABILITY TO CONTRACT IT! and too pass it on through sexual intercourse! It is less likely for women (of any sexuality) to pass it on. It goes for heteresexual men too - men are more likely to pass the virus on!

i suspect that this is true... however, at the time when the legislation to ban gay men from donating blood came through, socially speaking HIV/Aids was the gay man's disease. social views have moved on, along with a better understanding of the disease, and better understanding of other STDs. it's time the legislation around that old social view was changed to equal todays social understanding. but that is for a separate debate altogether.
 

lilithu

The Devil's Advocate
hmmm, BGLT? :)
Sorry. BGLT stands for Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian, and Transgendered. Sometimes Queer is included as well so you might see BGLTQ. And sometimes people change the order around, so you'll often see GLBT.

Since these groups face many of the same issues: hatred, discrimination, etc, we often talk about the BGLT communities as a group. We say BGLT because when people just keep saying "gay" we tend to forget lesbians, bisexuals, and transgendered folks. And "homosexual" leaves out bisexuals and transgendered. Sometimes we say "queer" to encompass all, but not everyone is comfortable with that word, so I tend to not use it unless I know the person.

As for Bacon, Guacamole, Lettuce and Tomato: hon we've been serving that up in California for decades. It ain't nothin' new to us. :p
 
Top