Me Myself
Back to my username
Your okay with him watching porn? I ask cause the women I grew up with would not have been fine with any males watching porn.
My she friends both understand and watch point themselves (though rarely allegedly)
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Your okay with him watching porn? I ask cause the women I grew up with would not have been fine with any males watching porn.
Except for the ones who want sex, and whether it's consensual or not is irrelevant to them. Sometimes things can be more varied and complicated than simplistic, false dichotomies.
My she friends both understand and watch point themselves (though rarely allegedly)
Except for the ones who want sex, and whether it's consensual or not is irrelevant to them. Sometimes things can be more varied and complicated than simplistic, false dichotomies.
Can you find me an example of anyone, ever, rapist or non-rapist, who had claimed not to care one way or the other whether their partner is consenting? I've done a lot of reading on the subject (psychology, sociology, studies of convicted sex offenders, etc, plus lots and lots of consensual sex), and I've never come across an example like that. Every survivor I know seems to have gotten the impression her attacker was specifically getting off on the force / domination. Like a "you don't get to say no to me" type of thing. They seemed fully aware consent was absent and seemed to be making some kind of point.
Your okay with him watching porn? I ask cause the women I grew up with would not have been fine with any males watching porn.
Can you find me an example of anyone, ever, rapist or non-rapist, who had claimed not to care one way or the other whether their partner is consenting? I've done a lot of reading on the subject (psychology, sociology, studies of convicted sex offenders, etc, plus lots and lots of consensual sex), and I've never come across an example like that. Every survivor I know seems to have gotten the impression her attacker was specifically getting off on the force / domination. Like a "you don't get to say no to me" type of thing. They seemed fully aware consent was absent and seemed to be making some kind of point.
Guys watch porn. I'm ok with reality.
Can you find me an example of anyone, ever, rapist or non-rapist, who had claimed not to care one way or the other whether their partner is consenting? I've done a lot of reading on the subject (psychology, sociology, studies of convicted sex offenders, etc, plus lots and lots of consensual sex), and I've never come across an example like that. Every survivor I know seems to have gotten the impression her attacker was specifically getting off on the force / domination. Like a "you don't get to say no to me" type of thing. They seemed fully aware consent was absent and seemed to be making some kind of point.
Two things.
One is that the victim`s perspective is an incomplete one (as is anyone`s, even those not deeply marked and hurt by such emotionally twisting dramatic event)
Second that as you very well say, those are those you know, and further more, those that you know that you know.
And the reason it can be a motivation is the mindset of the rapist, which is why I say no one rapes do to being horny .no one said it is just a matter of sex, what is said is that sometimes sex is the motivation.
Guys watch porn. I'm ok with reality.
And the reason it can be a motivation is the mindset of the rapist, which is why I say no one rapes do to being horny .
The attitude of "you don't get to say no to me" and wanting sex aren't mutually exclusive. Like every other human behavior, there can be a wide variety of complex motivations and factors. A few posts back, I brought up the example that in many cultures now and throughout history women are expected to succumb to their husband's sexual desire even if they don't want to. And I wouldn't be surprised if this type of spousal rape is the most common form overall. Painting each and every occurence of that as having only to do with domination and nothing to do with sexual urges seems to be a rather naive view of human behavior.
If I may say so, you're very wise. It seems to me relatively easy to accept the ways men and women are alike, but it requires some wisdom to accept the differences, such as they are.
All along I've been saying that what distinguishes rape from ordinary sex is the domination / control / force aspect of it. Not extreme levels of being really horny, or seeing a nipple.
All along I've been saying that what distinguishes rape from ordinary sex is the domination / control / force aspect of it. Not extreme levels of being really horny, or seeing a nipple.
I have never said that rape had nothing whatsoever to do with sexual intercourse ("contracourse?"). Obviously sexual gratification for the perpetrator is often involved.
But we call it "sexual assault" rather than "assaultual sex" for a reason.
Like women being poor drivers and overly emotional? Yes, it is wise to accept these differences.
Exactly! Finally, someone who understands me!