Senate Republicans oppose Reproductive Freedom for Women.

[Saint Frankenstein]

If you weren't there, how is it that
you claim to know she was forced?

It was in her book:

Britney Spears' abortion comments spark talk about men's role in reproductive health care

Britney Spears' revelation reminds us how ignoring men's role in reproductive health care pushes the idea that abortion is a women's issue, experts say.

www.usatoday.com

He pressured into an abortion she didn't want for selfish reasons.

 

[Revoltingest]

It was in her book:

Britney Spears' abortion comments spark talk about men's role in reproductive health care

Britney Spears' revelation reminds us how ignoring men's role in reproductive health care pushes the idea that abortion is a women's issue, experts say.

www.usatoday.com

He pressured into an abortion she didn't want.

People have a right to pressure each other.
This doesn't qualify as her having been
"forced" to have an abortion.

It's like my being "forced" to wait while
the Mrs shops for shoes. Hardly a legal
matter that should drive public policy.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

People have a right to pressure each other.
This doesn't qualify as her having been
"forced" to have an abortion.

It's like my being "forced" to wait while
the Mrs shops for shoes. Hardly a legal
matter that should drive public policy.

Whatever. I'm not getting into this with you. You're just being difficult for the sake of it now, when don't know what you're talking about. I'm really not in the mood for this crap.

 

[Revoltingest]

Whatever. I'm not getting into this with you.

You say that.
But you always come back.
I'm irresistible, apparently.

You're just being difficult for the sake of it now....

No, I'm arguing against your poorly supported claims,
which are employed to oppose reproductive freedom.
This matters.
If one cannot endure debate, one should re-consider
the positions one takes. Fundamental flaws.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

You say that.
But you always come back.
I'm irresistible, apparently.

No, I'm arguing against your poorly supported claims,
which are employed to oppose reproductive freedom.
This matters.
If one cannot endure debate, one should re-consider
the positions one takes. Fundamental flaws.

Not when I throw you on ignore, which I'm about to. Bye.

 

[Revoltingest]

Not when I throw you on ignore, which I'm about to. Bye.

History shows that I won't be there for long.

I also observe that posters who trumpet putting
someone ignore....aren't really ignoring. They
just say it as though it were an insult or victory
of some sort.
To ignore someone, ya gotta actually do it.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Anecdotal doesn't represent the whole.

You're not noticing the trend, eh ....

 

[SkepticThinker]

<yawn>

So, outside of those EXTREMELY rare cases, do we agree? LOL, not holding my breath. Some people care about innocent human life, others do not. I get it.

You really don't to seem to care much at all about the woman's life.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Republicans are for reproductive freedom. They are against killing the unborn and ending reproduction. Abortion has nothing to with reproduction. It is the opposite of reproduction.

It's healthcare.

Technically, the freedom not to reproduce, has been preserved, since it can be done in ways without killing babies.

Nobody is killing babies. Funny use of words though, considering just below you start complaining about "liberal word games." (Projection??)

That freedom is still there and was never touched. Nobody has the right to kill the defenseless. Even in war, where you have the right and duty to kill, killing the defenseless is taboo and can get indicted on charges for crimes against humanity.

That is why back to the States was the compromise. If Liberals are adamant then just the Liberal states can be the killing fields. I would prefer they do a better job showing the ladies there is more than one hostile option for practicing your right not to reproduce. If a woman wishes to practice her right to reproduce the Republicans have your back.

No they don't. They won't even give kids free lunches in schools. They definitely don't have anyone's back. With them, you're forced to have a kid, then you're on your own. Don't come looking for handouts! Pull yourself up by your bootstraps commie!

Liberal word games tend to misrepresent what they are selling. Where is the consumer protection agency when you need it. Project 2025 may have to restructure all the hack agencies the Left has created that tend to play favorites; NPR or national public radio.

The DNC strategy is Project 2025 fear mongering using misrepresentations and word games. They have nothing good to report or sell. I will try to translate their deceptions as they do.

The DNC's next fear mongering installment may be how Project 2025 will take away Social Security. Didn't the DNC already do that by giving Social Security to the illegal aliens, thereby reducing the SS solvency even more? Project 2025 wants to protect SS, by making it so the DNC can not keep using it like it is their own slush fund. The Seniors should be mad at the DNC for sticking it to them.

LOL The DNC didn't come up with Project 2025.

 

[SkepticThinker]

That is eugenics; the idea that certain classes of people shouldn't reproduce because of undesirable traits among them, such as criminality. The eugenics movement would often use such arguments as to why the birthrate of the poor and minorites should be kept down.

He didn't say any such thing.

 

[SkepticThinker]

You sound like Krappola Harris doing a word salad.

You sound like a petulant child. Name calling is for people who have no arguments left to offer.

 

[Laniakea]

You're not noticing the trend, eh ....

You're trending in the wrong direction.

 

[Laniakea]

LOL The DNC didn't come up with Project 2025.

That's right, it's the Republicans who actually have a plan, not the democrats. All dems have is their hatred of Trump, and democrat followers are just fine with that.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Anyone having 5 kids is alarming to me, what do different dads have to do with it?

It is an attempt to shame the mother. Yet it is often fine with these same people if a man has sex with a lot of women.

 

[Laniakea]

You sound like a petulant child. Name calling is for people who have no arguments left to offer.

That's it! I'm gonna tell Mommy!

 

[Laniakea]

It is an attempt to shame the mother. Yet it is often fine with these same people if a man has sex with a lot of women.

Really? Did you ask those people before writing that?

 

[Subduction Zone]

People have a right to pressure each other.
This doesn't qualify as her having been
"forced" to have an abortion.

It's like my being "forced" to wait while
the Mrs shops for shoes. Hardly a legal
matter that should drive public policy.

I am not so sure about that. Being forced to attend shoe shopping sounds like a violation of the Geneva Convention to me. Have you contacted the UN?

 

[Subduction Zone]

That's right, it's the Republicans who actually have a plan, not the democrats. All dems have is their hatred of Trump, and democrat followers are just fine with that.

This is the first time that I have heard as trying to institutionalize fascism as "a plan".

 

[SkepticThinker]

You're trending in the wrong direction.

The trend is in the direction of bodily autonomy. Turns out, Republican women value bodily autonomy as well.

 

[Revoltingest]

I am not so sure about that. Being forced to attend shoe shopping sounds like a violation of the Geneva Convention to me. Have you contacted the UN?

Not since that unpleasantness over
the length of me kilt being in violation
of the dress code.
They dint see nuthin but what God gave me!