-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Should Donald Trump be Sentenced to Jail for 34 Felonies?
- Thread starter Stonetree
- Start date
Laniakea
Not of this world
The point being that "interference" can be defined by the other side as anything that helped them win. Hillary Clinton certainly claimed it, but of course her own side didn't refer to her as an "election denier" since that term was invented by the Left, and applied only to Trump and anyone who votes for him.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Not according to the verdict.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Doesn't address the point either.
We Never Know
No Slack
I'm just saying..
If prosecuting someone for election interference is election interference..
Then...using that same logic..
Last edited:
Laniakea
Not of this world
Replying to my post without addressing the facts is glossing over the facts.
Laniakea
Not of this world
Bad verdict due to bad instructions from corrupt judge.
Garbage in, garbage out.
Your post contained no facts. Calling something a fact does not make it a fact,
Pogo
Well-Known Member
Your unsupported opinion is noted.
Laniakea
Not of this world
Calling something a verdict doesn't make it a verdict.
I am sure you actually think you are impressing us with your intelligence and deep understanding.
Laniakea
Not of this world
If you weren't impressed, you wouldn't be going on the defensive by pretending to not be impressed.
Pogo
Well-Known Member
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24706406/trump-verdict-sheet.pdf
Your opinion of what is at the link above would be appreciated.
Pogo
Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Not since it was done so to funnel funds to Stormy. Why would his attorney have funded Stormy on his own and demand a NDA protecting Trump? By the way, the NDA was found to be flawed and which is why Stormy never got into trouble for violating it.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, this appears to be rather rare occurrence. If you want to claim that the jury got it wrong the burden of proof is upon you. In this case the evidence can be seen by everyone else and it is clear from the evidence that Trump is guilty.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
How so? Election interference as a crime has to be based upon an illegal act. What was the illegal act?
McBell
Admiral Obvious
Desperate is as desperate does...
Laniakea
Not of this world
She never got into trouble because porn stars are above the law (and useful to democrats).